Is This Ford an Edsel?

There were two compelling stories this week: The Kavanaugh confirmation to the Supreme Court and the dueling tales respecting Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The latter was brilliantly handled by this site’s owner, Thomas Lifson, and I have little to add to his recitation of the events though I urge you to read it for a  concise analysis of what was reported this week.

The account in the New York Timeswhich first reported that Rosenstein had offered to wear a wire to record his conversations with the President and suggested the 25thAmendment might be pursued, strikes me at first glance as Andrew McCabe’s last-ditch attempt to fling poo on others when he seemed to be under threat of criminal prosecution. (It was troubling to me that, in violation of any good journalism practice, they ran it without contacting Rosenstein for his response.) In part I was reluctant to fully credit it because whatever you or I think of him, he always seemed too prudent to have spoken so intemperately to a group of what is now reported to have been seven or eight other people. A DoJ spokeswoman confirmed that he did make some remarks along that line, but in sarcastic response to aggressive anti-Trump comments by other participants in the discussion.

My online friend “Daddy” is not buying that, and offers up his own barbed reasons why: The Russia Hoax: The I... Gregg Jarrett Best Price: $3.36 Buy New $12.24 (as of 03:40 EDT - Details)

Maybe we ought to do “Rod Rosenstein’s best jokes.”

1)  “It’d be a real shame if someone had to subpoena you House Intel staffers to testify under Oath. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, just kidding.”

2)  “Hey, maybe I could wear a wire when I talk with Trump and he’ll say something so nutty we can get him institutionalized in the nut House. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, just kidding.”

3)  “So just for kicks I wrote this Memo telling Trump why Comey should be fired and that dummy actually believed I was serious. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,

4) “So even though the Law actually spells out that I had to write out the specifics of what my good buddy Bobby Mueller was supposed to be investigating, that idiot Judge Ellis actually thought I would have done that, so I told him my instructions to Bobby were too super secret for him to see. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.”

5) “Oh and you’ll love this one. So when Jim Jordon asked me under oath why I signed the FISA warrant without verifying what was in it I actually told him that’s not how the program works. I told him I don’t actually have to read it to know what’s in it. Nancy Pelosi couldn’t a said it any stupider, but the Media bought it. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.”

6) Uranium One? What’s Uranium On? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.”

In this regard, he makes some telling points that Rosenstein’s reputation for fair, competent work may well have been overblown.

Whether or not the statements were made sarcastically, there are lots of reasons why Rosenstein should be removed, or at a minimum, oversight of Mueller taken away from his portfolio and handed to someone else.

Gregg Jarrett, who’s been covering carefully the work of the special counsel, has even stronger reasons than remarks in the NYT’s article why Rosenstein should be replaced:

Rosenstein has been in charge of the Mueller probe. Yet, it is clear that he harbors an extreme bias against Trump. How can anyone now view the investigation as fair, objective and neutral? It is not.  It never has been.

The special counsel probe has been compromised and contaminated by Rosenstein’s actions, Mueller’s refusal to disqualify himself, the misconduct of former FBI agent Peter Strzok, and the obvious bias of lead prosecutor Andrew Weissmann. From the moment Trump was sworn in as president, saboteurs at the FBI and Justice Department have worked furiously to undo the election results and frame Trump for “colluding” with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election.

They conjured a false case based on a fabricated “dossier” paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and composed by a British spy who was fired for lying.

They misappropriated that document to launch the Trump-Russia investigation without probable cause. They then exploited the same “dossier” to wiretap a Trump campaign associate, Carter Page. In the process, they concealed vital evidence and deceived FISA judges, perpetrating a fraud on the court.

Those who abused their positions of power to subvert the rule of law and undermine the democratic process should be held accountable.

It should begin with the firing of Rod Rosenstein. It should end with a presentment to a grand jury for potential criminal indictments.

And Professor Alan Dershowitz says that the President should force Rosenstein to recuse himself — in a court proceeding, if necessary — and offers up compelling reasons why:   Killing the Deep State... Jerome R. Corsi Ph.D. Best Price: $4.81 Buy New $7.09 (as of 11:35 EDT - Details)

…what [Trump] could do very plausibly is have his lawyers go to court and make a motion to recuse Rosenstein from any involvement in any case involving the president.”

“Because he has a conflict of interest,” said Dershowitz, who is also an opinion contributor for The Hill. “He has two conflicts of interest: First, he wrote the memo… authorizing the firing of Comey. You can’t both investigate obstruction of justice and be part of the obstruction of justice.”

“But second, he has a conflict now because the Times reports that his goal is to be ‘vindicated,’ [ed: for Comey’s firing] and the way he can be ‘vindicated’ is by putting all the blame on President Trump,” Dershowitz added in the interview.

These issues will not be going away soon. The House Judiciary Committee announced this week that they plan to subpoena the McCabe memos which formed the substance of the NYT’s story. President Trump, moreover, has indicated that he’ll hold back on declassifying the McCabe memos hidden away inside the FBI and Special Counsel’s files — hidden from Congressional investigators and the DoJ’s Inspector General Michael Horowitz — until Horowitz has a chance to review them in his ongoing probe of FISA abuse by the DoJ and FBI. If Horowitz fails to do so, the President will declassify them himself.

In sum, the rocks are being turned over, and I wouldn’t want to be the worms that have been hidden underneath them.

Read the Whole Article