The
Rev. Mr. Longstreet and the Nine Dwarfs*
by
Clyde Wilson
You
may have missed the teapot tempest of PC hysteria that inaugurated
the campaign for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination. The
nine announced candidates gather today (May 3) in Columbia, South
Carolina, to unveil their charms in a public forum. The show was
scheduled to take place at the Longstreet Theatre on the campus
of the University of South Carolina.
Then
someone discovered that the building is named for the Rev. Augustus
Baldwin Longstreet, one time president of the University’s predecessor
institution, South Carolina College. And, Horrors! Mr. Longstreet
in the period before the War for Southern Independence defended
slavery and advocated secession! Of course, the august aspirants
for World Emperor could not be expected to meet on such unhallowed
ground, so the gathering was shifted to another building, about
which more in a moment.
Let’s
set aside the fact that the Longstreet Theatre has been the scene
previously of numerous public occasions in which at least two Presidents
of the United States, the current Pope, and numerous other world
dignitaries have appeared. Even William F. Buckley used to televise
his orchestrated debates from that very place since it is not too
far from the family winter palace in Camden. No one ever complained
about the name before.
What
strikes most is the astounding ignorance of and contempt for American
history that the political leaders and the press exhibit on this
and similar occasions. They act as if some dark and terrible secret
had been discovered. It is true that Longstreet, who was a Methodist
minister, newspaper editor, college president, and author, believed,
accurately, that the Scripture, while it condemned bad masters,
did not condemn servitude per se. There was nothing surprising about
this every member of the clergy in the South at that time
Methodist, Baptist, Episcopalian, Lutheran, Presbyterian,
Catholic, and Jewish said the same thing. So did orthodox
clergymen of the North (those opposed to evangelical hysteria and
the overturning of society according to the alleged divine revelations
of individuals). A number of distinguished Northern clergymen wrote
learned treatises against the abolitionists.
The
defenders of slavery were, unfortunately, forced into making these
unseemly statements because society was under attack by abolitionists.
Let’s be clear about this. Abolitionists were not people with rational
and moral objections to slavery who were anxious to find measures
to get rid of it, as the previous generations, including many Southerners,
had been. They were secularized post-Christian Puritans conducting
a malicious, slanderous, hate-filled, totalist propaganda campaign
against every aspect of Southern life with the ruthless irresponsibility
of religious zealots. (Remember, Lincoln was always careful to claim
that he was not an abolitionist!)
Abolitionists
proposed no practical steps for the end of slavery, an institution
inherited from early colonial times and intricately intertwined
in very basic ways with economics, society, and everyday life. Emancipation,
however desirable, posed problems for which not even Lincoln could
propose a real solution. Abolitionists were not concerned about
the welfare of black people. They wished to expunge their sinful
Southern fellow citizens from the earth, which they believed would
lead to a pure and heavenly America. Their leading egghead, Ralph
Waldo Emerson, said he was less concerned for the fate of a thousand
blacks (who he expected to disappear with the end of slavery) than
with one white man corrupted by slavery. Daniel Webster, the greatest
man of the North no less, said that the abolitionists were solely
responsible for destroying the prospects for eliminating slavery.
During
the brief press furor over the Rev. Mr. Longstreet, there were two
interesting (to me at least) facts about the situation that did
not come out. No one knew or bothered to mention that in spite of
his sins, Longstreet was the author of Georgia
Scenes, one of the classics of early American literature.
And that the Longstreet building, built in the 1850s as a gymnasium,
was used as a stable by the U.S. Army during the war and Reconstruction
(which saved it from being torched).
Also,
most people, if they think about it at all, think the building was
named for the Rev. Mr. Longstreet’s nephew, General James Longstreet.
But
it gets funnier. The carnival has been moved to the theatre in a
nearby campus building, Drayton Hall. I do not know for which member
of the Drayton family Drayton Hall is named. I do know that the
Draytons, who produced prominent leaders from the Revolution to
the Southern war, including a Confederate general, were for generations
among the largest slaveholders of South Carolina.
Drayton
Hall is bordered by College Street, Main Street, Greene Street,
and Sumter Street. Greene Street is named for General Nathaniel
Greene of the American Revolution, who was awarded a large Georgia
plantation for his services (the plantation on which, by the way,
Eli Whitney perfected the cotton gin). Sumter is named for General
Thomas Sumter, one of the heroic South Carolina partisan leaders
of the Revolution. He was also a large slaveholder and as an old
man in the late 1820s advocated the secession of South Carolina
from the Union.
In
fact, it is not easy to find a building built on the campus before
the 20th century, or a street in the central area of
the capital city of South Carolina that is not named for a slaveholder
or a secessionist! Obviously we have not gone nearly far enough
in expunging the evils of the past. While we are at it, let’s make
a clean sweep. Why should we wait for the civil rights groups and
the press to pick off these abominations one by one. Why should
our national capital, Washington, be named for that old slaveholder,
and the District of Columbia named for a dead white male exploiter
and genocidist? For that matter, does not the "States"
in United States suggest evil, exploded notions of State rights?
It is long past time that these matters be attended to.
*Dwarf
(noun), a little devil. Webster’s
New World Dictionary.
May
3, 2003
Dr.
Wilson [send him mail]
is professor of history at the University of South Carolina and
editor of The
Papers of John C. Calhoun.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
|