Pat Buchanan on His Latest Book, the Failure of Romney and What
the GOP Has To Do Next
by Anthony Wile
The Daily Bell
Recently
by Anthony Wile: What's
the REAL Story About the Flu Vaccine?
Introduction:
Patrick Buchanan has been a senior advisor to three presidents,
a two-time candidate for the Republican presidential nomination
and was the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000. From
1966 through 1974, Buchanan was an assistant to Richard Nixon, and
from 1985 to 1987, White House Director of Communications for Ronald
Reagan. In 1992, Mr. Buchanan challenged George Bush for the Republican
nomination and almost upset the president in the New Hampshire primary.
In 1996, he won the New Hampshire primary and finished second to
Sen. Bob Dole with three million Republican votes. Patrick Buchanan
has written ten books, including seven straight New York Times
bestsellers, most recently Suicide
of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?
Daily Bell:
Glad to have you back for another interview. Everyone knows who
you are but remind us anyway. Give us some background on yourself
and how you have developed professionally and intellectually.
Pat Buchanan:
Very briefly, I started in journalism over 50 years ago in June.
I was an editorial writer for three years and then joined Richard
Nixon and his campaign and stayed with him right through his presidency.
I became a syndicated journalist afterwards and served in Reagan's
White House and ran three times for president myself. That's my
basic summary.
Daily Bell:
Suicide of a Superpower caused a lot of controversy. You
eventually left MSNBC because of it. Can you fill us in?
Pat Buchanan:
It's almost a year behind us. MSNBC's chief said he felt the ideas
and beliefs in the book didn't belong being discussed on MSNBC or
on national media. I obviously disagreed with that assessment, as
did all the other networks who had me on the air, and it did become
a New York Times bestseller but I guess it was a breaking
point with MSNBC. I was delighted to be with them for ten years
and enjoyed it and enjoyed a lot of my friends over there, even
though very few of them agree with me.
Daily Bell:
What's next on the agenda? Another book?
Pat Buchanan:
I am working on another book right now on Richard Nixon and my first
three years with him, from 1966 to 1969, about the great comeback
and how he managed.
Daily Bell:
Interesting how times have changed. You called the US a failing
nation. Is it still failing?
Pat Buchanan:
I think, in a way, like many of the Western nations, America is
beginning to disintegrate along the lines of culture and ethnicity,
and identity and social differences, and it does not seem to be
the united country it used to be. That's what I write about in Suicide
of a Superpower, the reasons why I believe the country and our
civilization are in decline.
Daily Bell:
Did you vote for the GOP's Romney for president?
Pat Buchanan:
Yes, I did vote for Governor Romney and Paul Ryan and did so enthusiastically.
My sister worked for his campaign as a national surrogate and I
was disappointed in the outcome but it was not altogether unexpected.
I think that Hurricane Sandy stopped the Governor's momentum. It
was a great benefit to the President when you can play the role
of comforter-in-chief. I think he did it well. After that, President
Obama seemed to have regained the footing he had lost in the debates.
So I was not wholly surprised. I had not predicted a Romney victory
but I did have hopes.
Daily Bell:
We believe the GOP hijacked the nomination and took it away from
Ron Paul who was clearly gaining momentum and gave it to Romney.
Agree? Disagree?
Pat Buchanan:
I disagree with that. I think Romney won it fair and square and
it was a very rough campaign. Ron Paul is a friend of mine and I
have campaigned for him down in his congressional district in the
old days. I like him and he's been true to his convictions but I
don't think he was winning the nomination.
Daily Bell:
Why the antipathy to Ron Paul from top GOPers? Isn't the GOP a big
tent? Shouldn't it have rejoiced in Ron Paul's popularity? The numbers
apparently said he had a chance to beat Obama where Romney did not.
Pat Buchanan:
I do agree that Ron Paul belongs inside the Republican Party. Certainly
he's been a loyal Republican but I think on some issues neither
he nor I are in the mainstream of the Republican Party. We are both
deeply skeptical of foreign intervention and foreign wars and I
share that view with Dr. Paul. We both opposed the Iraq War and
I believe we were right. I think our views do belong in the Republican
Party and I think they are growing in terms of acceptance.
I've had a
number of people agree with the campaigns I ran in the 1990s, where
we said we ought to stay ought of these foreign quarrels and wars
that are none of our business and are bleeding our country, literally
bleeding it of its young people and, of course, bleeding it of enormous
amounts of money and wealth unless the vital interest of
the United States is threatened we ought to be deeply skeptical
about foreign wars.
So these ideas
certainly are long in the Republican Party and they're not the dominant
idea but I think on many social and cultural issues Ron Paul is
in the mainstream. On his belief in small government and his opposition
to taxes I think he qualifies as something of a purist but certainly
in sync 100% with a lot of traditionalist conservatives so he's
certainly part of the Republican Party. I was glad to see him do
the job he did and he did tremendously well. I will say this: I
believe, and I'm not certain, that he consistently out-polled any
of the other Republicans among young voters.
Daily Bell:
Why is the GOP the party of empire these days? Has it always been
that way? How did the GOP evolve?
Pat Buchanan:
The GOP evolved in the pre-war era, pre-WWII. Some of the Republican
Party's leading lights and brilliant minds were leaders in the America-first
movement to keep us out of WWII. While they succeeded for a long
period of time, Hitler made his fatal blunder of attacking the Soviet
Union and rival, Stalin. That's where most all the casualties in
WWII occurred; even though our side of the war was bloody as it
could be, the losses over there were literally in the millions.
I think that
after the war was over many Republicans, some of them young
Richard Nixon and Eisenhower and others reluctantly came
to the conclusion that the United States was faced with a global
challenge in the Soviet Empire and the Soviet Union in that it was
imperialist, it was ideologically ambitious and it was hell-bent
on global domination. I think they had good reason to believe that.
So they adopted a defensive strategy during the Cold War of peace
through strength and containment of the communist empire. I think
that Republicans took over, if you will, the leadership of the Cold
War when the Democratic Party broke and went with Senator McGovern
in 1972. Republicans held the leadership, I think, all the way through
the Cold War. There was Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush I. And the
Democrats only had one president and that was Jimmy Carter.
I disagreed
with the conservatives and the Republicans in that at the end of
the Cold War I thought we should have come home. Our war was over.
If it was necessary to contain the Soviet Empire we had done it.
The Soviet Empire collapsed, the Soviet Union collapsed, the Berlin
Wall went down, the Red Army got up and left Germany and left Eastern
Europe and went back to the Urals, and I thought America should
have done the same.
I think Ron
Paul and I basically agreed and argued that point. I was against
the Gulf War and I was against the Iraq War. So I think the rift
came inside the Party, to a degree, back in the end of the Cold
War, from about 1989 to 1991. I ran three times for president and
Ron Paul's run a couple of times and our views did not ultimately
prevail. They gained tremendous support but they didn't ultimately
prevail.
Daily Bell:
You are very concerned about mass immigration. Has your concern
abated with Obama's re-election or has it increased?
Pat Buchanan:
I think the problem is both legal and illegal immigration. Folks,
we now have a mammoth welfare state, which if you add up all the
transfer payments and welfare programs it's really something like
a trillion dollars. And this also is a magnet to very poor people
abroad. They come into the United States and if they don't get a
job they are well taken care of nevertheless. I think the enormous
numbers of folks coming in from the Third World have far more difficulty
assimilating obviously in what still remains a First World nation.
They don't bring the skills and the academic achievements, and the
capacity to really succeed, like Baby Boomers did in a First World
nation and in America, as advanced as it is, I think we are becoming
two countries.
If you look
at the election and stats of native-born white Americans, for example,
Governor Romney won by 20 points and he lost by 40 points among
immigrants and people of color, young people and single women who
depend heavily on government. So do I think it's going to be solved?
No. I don't think it's going to be solved.
Daily Bell:
Do you think Romney would have done a better job on immigration
from your standpoint?
Pat Buchanan:
Sure, I certainly do.
Daily Bell:
Libertarians believe that if all land were owned then there wouldn't
be an immigration problem. The problem is that government sets immigration
policy. Should the US give the one-third of the land it owns to
the citizens and get out of the immigration business?
Pat Buchanan:
I don't mean to be offensive, but are you kidding? But hey, listen.
I admire, respect and like libertarians. Murray Rothbard was a friend
of mine and he supported me in '92 and then he became disillusioned
with me by '96. They are very principled people and I like them.
They are very interesting in their ideas but to be truthful I don't
know of a single great nation that's ever been built by libertarians.
Libertarians say, sure, now we have all this industry from protectionism
so let's soften the borders.
Daily Bell:
Is it true that certain policymakers in the US want to create a
North American Union? Is this why former president George Bush wanted
to grant a blanket amnesty? Is it true that George Bush and now
Obama have created agreements with Mexico and Canada that will reinforce
a union?
Pat Buchanan:
I think not in a formal sense but there's no question about it
the American Southwest is becoming, and will become, culturally,
socially and linguistically as much a part of Mexico as it is of
the United States. Politically, I think Republicans will probably
capitulate and cease seeking to defend the border and send illegal
aliens home and impose sanctions on those who hire illegals, and
I think that's the end of one nation indivisible. With regard to
Canada, I think there's less of a problem. If I were a Canadian
I might want to build a border against the United States.
Daily Bell:
US officials are very scared of terrorism. Is this why US regulatory
agencies have purchased millions of dum-dum bullets? What are some
other reasons?
Pat Buchanan:
The reasons we are scared is because it can occur. It occurred in
Europe, it's occurred in the United States, Madrid and London, repeatedly.
The IRA was engaged in terror there, as well as Islamic terror,
Muslim terror. It also happens because we are over there. I think
terrorism occurs because we need to get out of all the countries
we occupy and leave these countries alone.
I don't know
who's purchasing dum-dum bullets but I do know that Black Friday
marked the biggest sale of guns in United States history. I think
the FBI gave clearance for the purchase of up to 150,000 weapons
for one day. I don't think the American people need to fear that
they are going to be disarmed. I think the folks who argue for second
amendment rights basically won the battle, horse, foot and dragoons.
Daily Bell:
Is the secession movement in the US picking up? If so, why?
Pat Buchanan:
I posted a column on the secession movement at my website last week.
I don't think it's as serious as the one my great-grandfathers were
involved in that got one of them killed! One was from Mississippi
and wound up in a federal penitentiary after being captured by the
forces of General Sherman when he was trying to defend Atlanta.
The otherr was killed and the only thing we found on his record
was the word Vicksburg.
So is this
serious? No, it's not. But I believe it's a manifestation of the
fact that Americans really don't like each other, some have even
come to detest each other, and many have come to dislike and detest
the United States and would rather not be a part of this country
and be in their own separate country.
How serious
they are about this or whether this is just an expression of feelings
I don't know. But I do know that this movement of people to associate
with their own kind, if you will, and to pull away ancient states
and nations is one thing I have written about in my book in the
chapter on ethno-nationalism.
We see its
manifestation with the Scots wanting to move out of Great Britain
and the Catalonians wanting to break free of Spain and Flanders
wanting to break out of Belgium and at last be a separate country.
There are parts of northern Italy that want to break away. We saw
Yugoslavia break up into seven different countries as soon as the
Cold War was over. Czechoslovakia broke in half. The Soviet Union
split into 15 pieces and is subdividing again.
So I think
there is a tendency, it seems to me, to overcome the centrifugal
forces that are pulling us toward one world and one-world government.
That was a very powerful movement in the '90s, when you had the
EU advanced, the Maastricht Treaty, you had NAFTA and you had the
World Trade Organization and the Copenhagen Meetings, these environmental
things all these things creating one world and eventually,
one-world government with the EU as the model. I think that's gone
into reverse.
Daily Bell:
Is the US becoming a more authoritarian place?
Pat Buchanan:
I think it's going to become a more authoritarian place. When you
have different ethnic groups and races and also different fundamental
religious beliefs and I consider ideology political religion
and these multiply, then you become less like the country
we were in 1960 than say the Habsburg Empire and eventually, I find
it hard to see how a democracy works.
We already
see the effort and this is very well advanced in the Democratic
Party to buy off interest groups, ethnic groups and all the
rest and create sort of a balkanized America. I see that coming.
This is one of the reasons why the subtitle on my book is "Will
America Survive Till 2025?" I see that it's certainly a geographic
expression called America and maybe a political entity but will
it be one country, indivisible? I'm not so sure.
Daily Bell:
Are internal passports in the future? Will it be harder to get out
of the US in the future?
Pat Buchanan:
I don't see that as a big problem, to be honest. People are moving
all over the country. They can't keep track of who's coming to the
country, but I do see, and you see it because its disintegration
of society ... you see identity cards and tags on students in schools
so teachers know where they are at all times. Let's hope the mayor
of New York is not the wave of the future. You can't smoke in Irish
bars and you can't have a 17-ounce soda pop and all the rest of
it. I do see the nanny state growing, there's no doubt about it.
The more people
you have and the more diverse you become ideologically, racially,
ethnically, socially, religiously, economically and when you commit
yourself to egalitarianism and equality, the only way you can achieve
equality in that kind of society is really to take from some and
continue giving to others, which requires a bigger, stronger government.
Daily Bell:
Why are the police and Homeland Security becoming ever more repressive?
Pat Buchanan:
I just don't know. I think this is a libertarian issue with which
I am not all that familiar. Maybe I should be but I don't see the
Department of Homeland Security being that big of a problem.
Daily Bell:
Why is the name of the organization "Homeland Security"?
Why the appeal to what some perceive as having resonance with the
Third Reich? Was this intention?
Pat Buchanan:
No, not at all! The defense of the homeland is a very positive phrase
to most Americans. Defense of the homeland you have foreign
policy and foreign wars so I don't read something horribly Third
Reichian into the name of the department. It's another mammoth agency
that was all cobbled together. All the various small agencies got
rolled into one in I think probably a political response to 9/11.
Daily Bell:
Is the American two-party system going to survive? Is a new party
needed?
Pat Buchanan:
Well, I tried that once and it didn't work. I think the real danger
right now is for the Republican Party. It is demographically facing
a very grim future because its political base, which is predominantly
Caucasian and Christian, is shrinking with the growth of population
as people of color are growing as a part of the population. I think
it's about 38-40% and they will be more than one-half of the population
by 2041. Anyone other than white or Caucasian, Barack Obama won
those voters, if you aggregate them, 80% to 20%.
So I think
the Republican Party faces a difficult problem but I don't see a
successor party on the horizon. You know, I came into politics with
and I was very much for Barry Goldwater. He was a good libertarian
and he didn't do that well. But I came into politics when the Democratic
Party was twice as large as the Republican Party, and working with
Candidate Nixon from '65 to '69 and through '72, we began to convert
the Republican Party into America's party and eventually it became
that in the 1980s and early 1990s. But the mass immigration and
the low birth rates with native-born Americans have combined to
make the future of the Republican Party look terribly grim.
Daily Bell:
You would never consider running for president again?
Pat Buchanan:
I would consider it but I wouldn't do it! I have a lot of scar tissue!
Daily Bell:
In closing, any final issues you want to mention?
Pat Buchanan:
Well, I do think the Republican Party will make a terrible mistake
if it lets itself be bullied into signing on to higher taxes and
violating its pledge to not raise taxes and basically abandoning
one of the main principals and planks of the Party, which have held
this bunch together. I think they are headed down that road and
I think it's a mistake. If they do it, I think they will rue the
day they did it.
Daily Bell:
Thanks for sitting down with us and answering the tough questions!
Pat Buchanan:
Thank you.
Daily Bell
After Thoughts
Mr. Buchanan's
worldview is expansive and informed, as one would expect from an
author of many bestselling books on politics and US policy. Caveats
can be presented as well, certainly from a libertarian point of
view.
These might
include Mr. Buchanan's perspective that Homeland Security is a fairly
harmless agency. From our point of view it is an extraordinarily
invasive and arrogant one with immense power.
It is bigness
that makes so many bad ideas dangerous if one is concerned
about individual freedoms.
Just yesterday
came the following news about the TSA, the Transportation Security
Administration one of Homeland Security's biggest subsidiaries
courtesy of Natural News. It's entitled, "TSA claims
Congress has no jurisdiction over it; refuses to attend hearings."
Here's an excerpt:
When officials
who head up a federal agency created and funded by Congress no
longer feel obligated to appear before the congressional committee
charged with overseeing the function of that agency, a situation
of genuine tyranny exists.
Enter John
Pistole, the Obama Administration's head of the notorious Transportation
Security Agency. He is not only refusing to appear before the
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, but he's even
gone so far as to declare that said congressional committee possesses
"no jurisdiction over the TSA."
That's more
than just arrogance; that's a dangerous precedent to set.
We'd agree
with that. Arrogance almost inevitably has an impact on subsequent
actions. Here's another article from Natural News, circa 2011:
TSA backscatter
radiation safety tests were rigged ... It can now be revealed
by NaturalNews that the TSA faked its safety data on its X-ray
airport scanners in order to deceive the public about the safety
of such devices ...
The evidence
of the TSA's fakery is now obvious thanks to the revelations of
a letter signed by five professors from the University of California,
San Francisco and Arizona State University. The letter reveals:??
To this day, there has been no credible scientific testing of
the TSA's naked body scanners. The claimed "safety"
of the technology by the TSA is based on rigged tests.??
The testing that did take place was done on a custom combination
of spare parts rigged by the manufacturer of the machines (Rapidscan)
and didn't even use the actual machines installed in airports.
In other words, the testing was rigged.?? The names of the
researchers who conducted the radiation tests at Rapidscan have
been kept secret! This means the researchers are not available
for scientific questioning of any kind, and there has been no
opportunity to even ask whether they are qualified to conduct
such tests. (Are they even scientists?)
Now, the issue
of backscatter radiation has never been resolved, to the best of
our knowledge, and it's a good example of the arrogance we're discussing.
Hundreds of millions of people throughout the world are subject
to these sorts of facilities and they may be receiving doses of
radiation that will prove injurious.
This irradiation
is being done in the name of the "war on terror"
itself a dubious invention. But it is hard to parse reality when
it comes to government and power elite memes. It is bigness itself
that makes them so resistant to scrutiny. Even when someone is declared
responsible for this or that issue, the myriad of public servants
below him or her may prove resistant to agreed-upon change.
Bigness is
not merely ineffectual. When it comes to government, smaller is
better.
Reprinted
with permission from The
Daily Bell.
December
3, 2012
Anthony
Wile is an author, columnist, media commentator and entrepreneur
focused on developing projects that promote the general advancement
of free-market thinking concepts. He is the chief editor of the
popular free-market oriented news site, TheDailyBell.com.
Mr. Wile is the Executive Director of The Foundation for the Advancement
of Free-Market Thinking – a non-profit Liechtenstein-based foundation.
His most popular book, High
Alert, is now in its third edition and available in several
languages. Other notable books written by Mr. Wile include The
Liberation of Flockhead (2002) and The Value of Gold (2002).
Copyright
© 2012 The
Daily Bell
The
Best of Anthony Wile
|