Veterans Day
by
Christopher Westley
by Christopher Westley
DIGG THIS
It was a November
evening in 2002 and I couldn’t avoid making my first trip to our
local VFW post. My son was beginning his first year as a Tiger Cub
– which is a sort of junior Boy Scout – and all the boys were meeting
there for a flag retirement ceremony. I was not sure what to expect,
although I remembered from my own Boy Scout days that a flag retirement
involved a sort of burnt offering of old and discarded flags. Parental
participation was required, even though in this queer age the Scouts
required that we refer to ourselves as our children’s "adult
partners". Apparently, the terms "Mom" and "Dad"
are out of fashion.
It was my first
time at the VFW, but it was easy to find. It is the only place in
town with a Vietnam-era helicopter sitting in the front. Supposedly
this is to remind passersby of past sacrifices to defend freedom.
To me, it symbolized several million dollars of conscripted capital
wasted in the military’s effort to spend its budget some fiscal
year, a long time ago. Several veterans were already at the VFW
before the ceremony began, and it was obvious that they took this
event very seriously. They stood around the perimeter of the yard
where the ceremony would take place, and smoked, their longish hair
blowing in crisp winds. Parents and children were invited to sit
on folding chairs set out for the occasion.
We did, and
then the ceremony began with a gruesome slideshow of the events
of September 11th. I immediately wanted to leave, thinking that
such pictures were inappropriate for a six-year old. My son had
a scant idea of what happened on that day, and I did not appreciate
this effort to circumvent my authority. But this was part of the
ceremony, and my son’s friends were all there, so what could I do?
I now know that the images of September 11 have been impaled on
the brains of every public school student from kindergarten and
up – a government-funded attack on innocence.
Then we began
the first of many prayers. I wondered how many of the vets there
realized that the government they were defending opposed public
prayer such as the ones they were reciting. The entire ceremony
reeked of confusion between God and Country. Both were considered
objects worthy of our worship. I learned that, in the new millennium,
war prayers no longer ask for God’s blessings on our armed forces.
We now add emergency medical technicians, police, and firefighters,
as if to underscore these individuals’ modern role as an adjunct
military force required for future episodes of domestic terrorism.
The vets also
prayed for success in our next war in Iraq, which was then considered
by many to be a done deal. I recall these prayers raising other
questions in my head. Was it realistic to still hope that the war
could be averted? Why do veterans think that God will bless them
with success in killing innocents? Have any of these men ever pondered
that the symbiotic relationship between the welfare and warfare
states fuels this war far more than any foreign leader’s trumped
up belligerence? And for that matter, was I the only one there who
noticed the less-than-subtle switch from the World Trade Center
attacks to the war in Iraq, as though these events were somehow
related?
Next came the
guest speaker, a retired NYPD policeman, to offer his thoughts on
terrorism and the upcoming war. He spoke about a friend of his who
died in Tower 1 on the Fateful Day and how ironic it was that he
was to die in the WTC because they first met in Oklahoma City cleaning
up the rubble as a part of the FEMA cleanup project. The economist
in me objects to this self-congratulatory emphasis on supposedly
selfless public service. These people are paid well for what they
do, and indeed in some cases, they earn well into the six figures.
Besides, unlike the Vietnam veterans standing there, New York’s
municipal police, firefighters, and EMTs were not conscripted into
service. While I am occasionally grateful for their sacrifices,
they became public employees voluntarily, in the process claiming
the wealth of others they decided to serve whether we wanted them
to or not. This sacrifice cannot compare to the poor draftee who
lost his life in a Vietnamese jungle.
Finally, the
holocaust of flags began, and with more prayer. My son squirmed
when he realized that these men were going to burn that pile of
flags up on the makeshift funeral pyre, and I took heart that he
must be subconsciously grasping a surreal quality in the night’s
events. He wanted to leave but was too embarrassed to try in front
of his little friends. As the old flags burned, "Amazing Grace"
was played, first on a flute, then on bagpipes, as if to emphasize
this secularized version of a sacrificial death of a cloth deity.
The closing
hymn, Lee Greenwood’s "Proud to be an American" was sung
by all, the words known by heart (to my surprise). I looked up.
One of the older and grizzled Vietnam-era vets removed his glasses
and wiped tears from his eyes. Another man grabbed the microphone
to remind the crowd (and to quell any doubts) that America is still
a free country. I grabbed my car keys and remembered that the federal
government only took 20 percent of our incomes the year the Vietnam
War ended, and that taxes in the early 1970s didn’t fund any programs
similar to today’s Citizen
Corp, a program that trains neighbors to spy on each other.
Is this what the veterans fought for?
The event was
attended primarily by enlisted men – draftees who did the brunt
of the dirty work in Vietnam, and who felt the most pain, loss and
tragedy. I don’t blame them for participating in such ceremonies,
but I noticed that none of my several friends who are retired military
officers took the time to attend. For these men, the war was the
basis for a career and a cushy retirement marked by golf club memberships
and travel.
I was asked
a couple of times (by students) during that Veterans Day how I thought
veterans should be honored. I think they should, although I think
that those who were forced into service, via conscription, deserve
more honor than those who served in the volunteer army. In either
case, I do not think that we honor them by supporting the government
every time it sends men in harm’s way in the name of unconstitutional
empire.
Instead, we
honor them by increasing trade ties with countries, knowing that
economically isolated countries are easier to bomb. We honor them
by defending our own freedoms in post-9/11
America. We honor them by remembering that while war is the
health of the State, it is also death to the Republic, thus making
even successful military operations self-defeating in the long run.
In short, we
honor those who fought fascism abroad by opposing fascism at home.
It seemed to me that that is the more fitting way, when compared
to propagandizing veterans to justify enhancing the power of the
nation-state, maintaining political support for otherwise unpopular
leaders, increasing already-bloated military
budgets, and the diminution of freedom.
On
Veterans Day 2002, I was sad to learn that such ideas would be considered
heresy at most of the VFW posts around the country. Not much has
changed over the last five years. This is truly a pity, if only
because it insures that the future membership rolls of VFW posts
are secure.
November
13, 2007
Chris
Westley
[send him mail] teaches
economics at Jacksonville State University, Alabama.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Christopher
Westley Archives
|