Political Pilgrims at the National Review
by Jude
Wanniski
by Jude Wanniski
Memo
To: Website Fans, Browsers, Clients
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: Wow, A Constitution for Iraq!
A few days
ago, I got an e-mail from a young British historian who asked for
my help on a project he is embarking on an account of how
the American conservative movement morphed into the neo-conservative
movement. It’s quite a story, for another time, but I was at least
prompted to devote today’s memo to the topic by Lew
Rockwell’s commentary today on his website. As a libertarian,
Rockwell has observed the process, and writes about the net result,
the political pilgrimage of William F. Buckley Jr’s National Review
from small state, antiwar libertarian upon its founding a half century
ago to today’s rubber stamp for whatever the federal government
wants as long as it has the Republican label. Buckley no longer
runs the magazine and has agonized in print over its support for
the war in Iraq, but in the end has joined the political pilgrims
in cheerleading for the war and all the good things it is bound
to produce in the end.
The theme
is a simple one: In for a dime, in for a dollar. Once you decide
to invest in a war that seems justified, you can’t let go even when
hindsight justification of the war seems preposterous. It is too
personally embarrassing to quit, even though staying the course
means how many more dead soldiers and innocent citizens who
have been bombed for their own good.
To get the
full flavor of Rockwell’s trenchant observations you should read
them in full, especially when he slices and dices yesterday’s piece
at NR Online, “Constitutional Crossroads,” by Williamson
M. Evers and Tom G. Palmer, the former of the conservative Hoover
Institution, the latter of the libertarian CATO think tank. For
example, the two rhapsodize that the draft of the constitution they
looked over actually prohibits torture!! Here is the opening of
Rockwell’s column:
Last
Friday, as the puppet leaders in Iraq were arguing about what is
going to be the Iraqi constitution, they had to speak especially
loudly to be heard over the explosions and bombs outside. These
are not ideal conditions under which to forge a new governing authority,
especially one purporting to grant liberty and rights. The first
ambition of the state will always be to exercise power. And if there
were ever a constitution designed to enhance government power, this
is it.
There will
always be
"political pilgrims" who say otherwise. This is a phrase coined
by the sociologist Paul Hollander, who documented the absurd travels
of Western leftists to remote parts of the world where communism
was being tried out. They invariably found a future of prosperity,
freedom, and justice for all, and developed an incredible blindness
to terror, starvation, and despotism of all sorts, dismissing
it as necessary to block the work of evil dead-enders. Also, in
another famous excuse, if the government has to expend so many
resources on fighting off dissidents, it couldn’t make basic provisions
for the masses or so goes the claim.
Their ideology
allowed them to see only what they wanted to see. Commies have
done this since the earliest days of the Bolshevik Revolution.
But political pilgrimages are not a partisan party. Anyone of
a certain bent regardless of ideology is susceptible to becoming
a spokesman for the Party. Ideology can do that to people, for
reasons that will never be fully clear.
And so we
have our own political pilgrims going to Iraq to see the wonderful
world that Bush has made. They pay no attention to the bombs and
death, or write it off as evidence of reactionary sentiment that
must be stamped out. The Bush regime claims that it is creating
liberty there, so the pilgrim’s job is to find it and defend it,
with no critical or independent thought allowed.
What better
publication for a right-wing political pilgrimage than National
Review? Every day you can read the "good news" on Iraq from
their interchangeable columnists such as
Deroy Murdock who thinks it is just glorious that there are
ever more troops in uniform in Iraq. He paints a beautiful picture,
from the Pentagons standpoint, over the canvas of reality
The phrase “I
have seen the future and it works” is attributed to a New York
Times reporter, Walter Duranty, the paper’s Moscow correspondent
from 1921 to 1934, who won the Pulitzer for a 1931 series of reports
about Soviet dictator Josef Stalin's five-year plans to reform the
economy. His stories appeared in the Times before the Ukrainian
famine of 19321933, which left 5 million to 10 million dead.
Somehow, I doubt there will be any Pulitzers awarded to the National
Review for its unabashed optimism for Iraq’s future and neo-con
foreign policy.
August
12, 2005
Jude
Wanniski [send him mail]
runs the financial/political advisory service Wanniski.com.
Copyright
© 2005 Jude Wanniski
Jude
Wanniski Archives
|