The Christian Axis of Evil
by
Laurence
M. Vance
by Laurence M. Vance
"North
Korea is a regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction,
while starving its citizens. Iran aggressively pursues these weapons
and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian
people’s hope for freedom. Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility
toward America and to support terror. . . . States like these,
and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming
to threaten the peace of the world." ~ President George W.
Bush, State
of the Union Address, January 29, 2002.
"Beyond
the axis of evil, there are other rogue states intent on acquiring
weapons of mass destruction – particularly biological weapons.
. . . In addition to Libya and Syria, there is a threat coming
from another BWC signatory, and one that lies just 90 miles from
the U.S. mainland – namely, Cuba." ~ U.S. Ambassador to the
UN John R. Bolton, Remarks
to the Heritage Foundation, May 6, 2002.
Bush and Bolton
chose their words carefully. The term "axis of evil" was
deliberately designed to invoke images of the Axis Powers in World
War II, which, of course, included Nazi Germany. Saddam Hussein
was then said to be another Hitler, and the U.S. invaded Iraq. Now
it is the president of Iran who is being compared to Hitler, by
the Bush
administration and others.
And who will
be among the first to support the president’s next military adventure?
Why, the same ones that will support his current endeavor until
the bitter end: Christians who try to serve two masters – Christ
and the state (as long as it is controlled by "conservatives"
or the Republican Party).
It is a disgrace
– no, it is a moral outrage – that many Christians continue to support
Bush and his war. Christian "leaders" are leading their
followers astray. The blind are leading the blind. It is Christian
"leaders" who moonlight as apologists for Bush and his
war that make up the true axis of evil. To match the six members
of Bush and Bolton’s axis of evil, here are six members of the Christian
axis of evil.
The first member
of the Christian axis of evil is the Baptist pastor Jerry "God
is pro-war" Falwell. It was bad enough when Falwell made a
ridiculous, feeble attempt to justify, with Scripture, Bush’s invasion
of Iraq in a horrendous 2004
WorldNetDaily article entitled "God is Pro-war." (I
have critiqued this article here).
On FOX News’ Hannity
& Colmes show on February 11, 2005, Rev. Falwell appeared
opposite Rev. Wallis of Sojourners and tried to deny that
many evangelical Christians were opposed to the Iraq war. Falwell’s
claim that the anti-war Christian movement could fit into a
phone booth shows just how out of touch with reality he is. Falwell’s
Liberty University (supposedly a Baptist institution) then gave
Hannity (a Roman Catholic) an honorary
doctorate, and had him deliver the university’s commencement
address on May 14, 2005. Senator John McCain, said by Liberty
to be "a practicing Christian," delivered the commencement
address this year.
The second
member of the Christian axis of evil is Pat "take out Chavez"
Robertson. He is another Christian apologist for the Republican
Party who has supported this war from the beginning. Robertson,
who actually believes the war is being fought on Christian
principles, considers criticism of the war to be treason.
It should be noted that Robertson’s "faith-based initiative,"
Operation Blessing, receives millions of dollars in federal
grants every year.
The third
member of the Christian axis of evil is the psychologist and author
James "just war" Dobson of Focus on the Family. Back on
March 31, 2003, soon after the invasion of Iraq, Dobson expressed
his support for the war on his national
daily radio broadcast. America entered Iraq "as a liberator
– not as a conqueror." After equating Saddam Hussein with Stalin
and Hitler, Dobson labeled Hussein another brutal tyrant who "must
be stopped" because the United States has a "moral obligation"
to stop evil and tyranny. Invoking the Neville Chamberlain argument,
Dobson insisted that "appeasement of tyrants is never successful!"
Just before this broadcast, in the March
27, 2003, issue of Boundless (a webzine published by
Focus on the Family), a two-part column by Jay Budziszewski (Professor
Theophilus) was interrupted in the "Office Hours" section
to reprint one of his "classic" columns from the April
29, 1999, issue entitled "Can War Be Justified?" His
answer was, of course, yes, even if the war is not for self-defense.
That was three
years ago. Perhaps Dobson has changed his mind?
Since phone
calls and e-mails to his organization yield no response to this
important question, we will have to rely on Focus on the Family
publications, including its website. In the March 2006 issue of
Citizen magazine, there is a pro-war article entitled "Worth
the Sacrifice." The author, Karl Zinsmeister, believes
the war is justified because of how we are helping the children
of Iraq. He believes that the United States has been "fighting
a war of principle, for self-determination, to make a grim part
of the world more humane and thereby less threatening, so that our
children and Iraq’s can grow up to enjoy God’s dignity and freedom."
In the same issue of Citizen, there is an interview conducted
by associate editor Stephen Adam with Daniel Ayalon, the Israeli
ambassador to the United States. The interview is headlined "Israel,
Iran and the Global War on Terror." In reply to the question:
"Do you agree with President Bush’s approach to the global
war on terror?" the Israeli ambassador said:
Absolutely.
Absolutely. We have to realize it’s a war and it’s a total
war-and once you realize it, that you’re in a war, you cannot
fight with one hand tied behind your back. The terrorists do not
do that. They would use any vulnerability and everything in their
power to destroy us. So, we have to be prepared for that. We have
to take the war into their camp. If you play defensive, you know,
things like 9/11 can happen again. You have to go after them to
frustrate their organization, to go after their leaders, after
everybody who gives them shelter as well.
A broadcast
CD is available for sale from the Focus Resource Center entitled
"Supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom." It is described on the website
with these words: "Dr. and Mrs. Dobson, along with co-host
John Fuller, express their support for America’s military, discuss
the atrocities taking place under Iraq’s evil regime, and emphasize
the need for our nation to unite in prayer." There is no date
given for when the broadcast was aired, but that is irrelevant since
it is still for sale on the website. On April
19th and 20th
of this year, Dobson interviewed on his radio program Admiral Timothy
Keating, the current Commander of NORAD and NORTHCOM at Peterson
Air Force Base in Colorado. Obviously, this was not to criticize
the war.
The fourth
member of the Christian axis of evil is the prophecy guru Hal "I’m
on my fourth wife" Lindsey, who recently claimed in a column
for WorldNetDaily, contrary to the Bush administration, that
"it is now evident to all but the blindest partisans that the
intelligence was correct and that Saddam not only had weapons of
mass destruction, but that he worked directly with al-Qaida."
Incredibly, after saying in his article that "Lenin is reputed
to have referred to blind defenders and apologists for the Soviet
Union in the Western democracies as ‘useful idiots,’" Lindsey,
one of the blindest apologists for this war that Bush could ever
hope for, labels opponents of Bush’s war as the "useful idiots."
The fifth
member of the Christian axis of evil is Cal "I have a long
list of favorite patriotic movies" Thomas. Back before the
Iraq war formally started in March of 2003, Thomas, invoking Scripture,
wrote in a column
dated February 19, 2003, that "if ever there was a ‘time
for war’ (Ecclesiastes 3:8), surely this is it." This was just
after he wrote in a column
dated February 6, 2003, about Colin Powell speaking to the U.N.
Security Council and making "so strong a case that Iraqi dictator
Saddam Hussein is in material breach of U.N. resolutions that only
the duped, the dumb and the desperate could ignore it." This
is the speech that Lawrence Wilkerson, a former colonel in the U.S.
Army, a decorated Vietnam vet, and a life-long Republican who served
as chief of staff to former Secretary of State Colin Powell, has
recently stated was "a hoax on the American people, the
international community, and the United Nations Security Council."
This is the speech that Powell
himself said, in a February 2005 interview with Barbara Walters
on the ABC News 20/20 program, was a "blot" on his record.
Did Thomas learn from his mistake? His most
recent statement about the war is his most radical one yet:
"This war should be stepped up and fought like World War II."
And this man is "the most widely published op-ed writer in
the world"?
The sixth
member of the Christian axis of evil is Pat "I wanna get in
the Rock N’ Roll Hall of Fame" Boone. Although he has been
in
the news of late for rebuking the Dixie Chicks because they
refuse to respect a president who lied the country into war, Boone
was a full-fledged Christian warmonger and Bush apologist long before
then. But that hasn’t stopped him from being an embarrassment to
the president:
Boone:
"More 9-11s are gonna happen unless we try to take the battle
to them on their turf instead of letting ’em bring it to us on ours."
Bush:
"We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September
the 11th."
Boone:
"Pre-war intelligence about Saddam’s WMDs was correct all along."
Bush:
"It is true that most of the intelligence turned out to be wrong."
Boone is part
of a desperate group of diehard Republican armchair warriors who
maintain that Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction were smuggled across
the border into Syria. But being the champion warmonger that he
is, Boone
further maintains that "they may still be there, waiting
to be used against us." First
it was said to be an unnamed number of trucks that transferred the
weapons to Syria in February and March of 2003. Now
it is said to be converted 747 passenger jets that transported the
weapons into Syria in 2002. The latter claim (examined here)
is based on the word of former Iraqi general Georges Sada (examined
here),
who claims that the two pilots (unnamed) of the two airliners that
moved the weapons on fifty-six flights told
him about it (he was not an eyewitness). Syria? According to
Stephen
Zunes (Middle East editor for Foreign
Policy In Focus, and author of Tinderbox:
U.S. Middle East Policy and the Roots of Terrorism (Common
Courage Press, 2002):
Syria, despite
being ruled by the Baath Party, has historically been a major
rival of Iraq’s Baath regime. Syria was the only Arab country
to back Iran during the Iran-Iraq War. It was one of the only
non-monarchical Arab states to have backed the United States against
Iraq during the first Gulf War. Iraq and Syria backed rival factions
in Lebanon’s civil war. As a member of the United Nations Security
Council, Syria voted this past November in favor of the U.S.-backed
resolution 1441 that demanded full cooperation by the Baghdad
government with United Nations inspectors, with the threat of
severe consequences if it failed to do so.
But as I have
previously showed in my article, "Weapons
of Mass Distraction," it doesn’t matter whether Iraq had
weapons of mass destruction. There is still absolutely no reason
why the United States would be justified in attacking and invading
a sovereign country – no matter what we thought of that country’s
ruler, system of government, economic policies, religious intolerance,
or human rights record.
Poor Pat Boone
doesn’t know if he wants to be a consecrated Christian or a rock
star; he hasn’t decided whether he should be a singer or a political
commentator.
I suppose that
since the publisher of WorldNetDaily,
Joseph "I believe I am the only serious daily news columnist
on the Internet" Farah, published the articles I referenced
by Falwell, Lindsey, and Boone, and, judging by the things he himself
has written, believes what those gentlemen have written, that he
will have to be added to the Christian axis of evil as well. But
that would make seven members, and since I have limited the group
in this article to six, I won’t include him – this time.
Anyone who
is familiar with my writings knows that I do not write these criticisms
as an outsider. I am willing to match my Christian, Protestant,
conservative, evangelical, fundamentalist, Baptist credentials up
against anyone. And yes, I know all about the doctrines of Islam
and the dangers of "Islamofascism." But I also know all
about the insidious nature of a U.S. foreign policy that sows discord,
stirs up strife, intensifies hatred, and creates terrorists.
There
is no telling how many thousands of Christian Americans that Bush
administration lapdogs Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, Lindsey, Thomas,
and Boone have influenced. I am sure there are many other Christian
leaders and wannabe leaders who, because they likewise serve as
cheerleaders for the president, the war, and the military, are candidates
for membership in the Christian axis of evil. Identify them, mark
them, avoid them – and speak out against them if you can. It is
only when Christians learn to look behind the façade of religious
piousness that cloaks these Christian warmongers that the influence
of the Christian axis of evil will be destroyed.
July
24, 2006
Laurence
M. Vance [send him mail]
is a freelance writer and an adjunct instructor in accounting and
economics at Pensacola Junior College in Pensacola, FL. He is also
the director of the Francis
Wayland Institute. His new book is Christianity
and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State. Visit
his website.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Laurence
M. Vance Archives
|