The Fall of the POP-Mail Generation
by
Jeffrey A. Tucker
DIGG THIS
Too many anecdotes
have come my way that suggest a serious social-cultural crisis is
brewing. The symptoms include feeling overwhelmed and behind the
times. Friends and family offended by one person's unresponsiveness.
Tasks are dropped or not completed. Seething anger is brewing over
your or someone's irresponsibility. You or someone you know is developing
a reputation for uncharacteristic flakiness or a tendency to forget.
You or someone you know doesn't do what he says he will do.
These are the
symptoms. The results are broken friendships, unraveled professional
lives, and personal depression. The devil may care, you say. But
it's not the devil that's the problem. It's the people you love
and love you who are resenting you and thinking that your life is
falling apart.
All of this
is a very serious matter, but the root cause of it is oddly mundane:
the failure to manage email.
I know of several
dozen cases such as this. People with chaotic in-boxes are embarrassed
to admit that they have a problem. They try to walk away from it,
but when they return, the mess is worse than ever. They begin to
resent people who write them, and those who write resent not being
answered in a timely way. The situation takes a while to fester
but ultimately can end in disaster.
This is happening
to many people in a certain age bracket, those who can count themselves
among the POP-mail generation. I am among them, so I know the mentality
well. Pop mail was the first method by which we received email.
Email was an electronic form of the real mail. It was something
that "arrived" and planted itself on our computers in the same way
that regular mail arrives in our mailbox.
We have an
in-box. We have an out-box. If we are really organized, we have
folders and we drag these physical things around and plant them
the way we file our receipts or bills. And we keep these things.
We keep them for years, the same as people once kept letters. We
have archives of email dating back to the mid-1990s.
The programs
we used were called Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora, and, more
recently, Thunderbird. Young people know nothing of these programs.
They don't know anything about SMTP settings, outbound mail servers,
and the like. Email has no physical analogy. It is nothing more
than an electronic communication and should be treated as such.
They are messages. They come to the phone, to one's social-network
inbox, and also to one's webmail account.
But older people
like myself have had a terribly hard time switching out of the POP
world and into webmail. We resent it when people tell us how old
hat we are. We briefly tried some webmail gadget and didn't like
it because it doesn't seem real or physical. We wonder about security
and who can read our messages. So we stick with the POP system,
swearing that we will be buried with our email clients.
And yet there
are problems. No mail client on the planet was designed to manage
the amount of email we receive. No mail client can keep a backlog
of 3, 5, 10 years of email. At some point, the thing gums up. It
crashes. Our inbox is wiped out. Why? We search the forums. We ask
the geeks. No one can fix it, so we start over again with the same
idiotic system. Eventually it crashes again, and we curse the makers
of Outlook or Eudora.
For some, this
system has led to even greater social disasters. The in-box has
hundreds of messages piled up and unanswered. These people are so
panicked about it that they can't form coherent answers to questions
that people ask. They get angry and others angry at them. Then there
is the problem of syncing home and work and travel computers. We
get messages on one that do not appear on the others.
We try to cobble
together convoluted systems: remove from server here but leave on
server there. Get a copy here but if deleted it deletes from both
places. It makes sense for a time but there are bugs. We lose things.
We should put our minds to it and change our settings in some way,
but who wants to fiddle with all that? Down with the whole thing!
But there is
no escape. The messages keep coming in: 20, 50, 100, 300 per day.
Some are important and most are trivial. We lose the mental clarity
to distinguish between them.
Then there
is the spam problem. If we use an older client, we get one good
email for every 10. We try spam controls but they don't work well.
Or they work too well, and we miss important messages. We know that
we can dig through our spam box but who has time for that anymore?
I'm a survivor
of this system. I suspected the problem two years ago, and advised
people to make a switch to webmail. I knew it was the right thing.
Did I switch myself? No. I held on to the POP-mail method, secretly
fearing a change. I worried about my archive, my address book, and
I certainly did not want another email address. So I kept it up.
Finally it became too much, and in one dramatic day, two weeks ago,
I changed. Laugh if you want, but it was one of the most difficult
decisions of my adult life.
Now I wonder
what I was thinking.
My main email
is now hosted at Mises.com, which
runs a gmail-style interface. There might be other good systems
out there, but let me describe how gmail works. It organizes your
email the way you actually use it, and in ways you might not even
know you use it. It organizes email by date of arrival and then
stacks conversations according to the subject. When you replay to
an email, the file containing this email is displayed along with
your response. When the reply comes back again, the reply comes
back and is displayed with the entire history of your conversation.
This is a tremendous
luxury that no POP-mail person would think of asking for because
it seems too complicated. It's not complicated for gmail. Now when
I get an email that says "yes, please run it," I don't have to wonder
what the heck the guy is referring to. Now the entire history of
the correspondence is right there. I'm ahead of the game.
Gmail includes
folders such as inbox, outbox, etc., but these are just formalities.
Every email you have ever sent or received is immediately accessible.
This is really important for attachments. In POP-mail, when someone
says "did you get that article I sent," you have no idea where to
find it. With gmail it is right there.
In terms of
managing the interface, you don't delete email. You "archive" it.
The archive is always available through a quick search: name, text,
address, anything. It comes right up. Yes, you can tag your emails
with a label for even more instant recall but this is not necessary
since the search is infallible.
What about
the problem of a new email address? The answer is that you don't
have to use it. You can add your old accounts to gmail and forward
the mail from your provider to your new address. Then you can send
and receive from your old address. No one will ever know the difference.
But you will have control over your life again.
And spam? The
New York Times ran a story the other day about some guy who is inventing
the ultimate spam solution, but as I read, I thought this is sheer
nonsense. Gmail has already solved the problem, or at least reduced
it to the point that it is not a noticeable problem at all.
What about
your contact list which you have worked years to cumulate? Go to
your old POP client, export the address in a CSV format, and then
import them to gmail. You are done. Your whole life has transferred
over.
What about
that huge stack of unanswered emails? Forward them to your new gmail
address and deal with them that way. You might take an afternoon
to put all this together, but the time savings arrives almost immediately.
Your email is the same wherever your are: home, work, travelling
or wherever. It only takes you a moment to check it. You are in
or you are out.
Anyone can
get a gmail address. They are free.
You can also
get a mises.com address – which
is beautiful and wonderful in every way. You only need to sign up
at the Austrian Network and post on the forum. You are then entitled
to a Mises.com email address. Again, it uses gmail as its interface
so you get all the above features plus you have the high status
that comes with using a mises.com address if you so choose.
I know that
many people are reading this thinking: I can't stand any more change
in my life. I've had it with new gizmos. The last thing I want is
to deal with email. I hate email! But listen: the reason you hate
email is that your inbox is out of control. This is hugely significant
these days: it means your life is out of control, and you know that
if you think about it.
So
hate innovation and email and computers all you want but make the
switch from POP-mail to gmail. It will be the switch that will put
your life back together. You can then repair friendships, shape
up at the office, and end the depression.
Your choice
about how you manage email is no longer a choice over trivial gizmos.
It is a choice about the whole of how you manage life itself. More
hangs in the balance than you know. Make the switch and start your
life anew.
December
6, 2007
Jeffrey
Tucker [send him mail]
is editorial vice president of www.Mises.org.
Comment on
the Mises blog.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Jeffrey
Tucker Archives
|