The
First Truly Literate Generation
by
Jeffrey A. Tucker
Remember
those silly days in the 1990s, when Clinton, Gore, and their friends
cobbled together our money to put computers in every classroom and
community center? The hope was that the computer would at last do
what the government has so far been unable to do after a century
of work: make every child literate and high-minded. It turned out
that most of the new computers gathered dust and became obsolete.
The web was dull and uneventful in those days. But no longer. It
turns out that there was a kernel of truth in the Clinton view:
computers can be a wonderful tool for learning. What looks like
time-wasting provides important technical training, a vehicle for
healthy socializing, access to a vast world of information from
all ages, and crucial practice for literary expression that will
pay lifelong returns. No, it won't turn a pig's ear into a silk
purse, but it can give a kid an extra boost in many ways.
(Hey, wow, my
son just won the World Cup!)
Consider the major one: writing ability.
For
practicing writing, getting feedback from peers, and just for the
joy of composition, blog forums like MSN
Spaces are wonderful opportunities for kids, though closer-knit
kid-boutiques like Poohblogs
are probably a more fruitful (and safer) venue. Such venues are
a great way for kids to meet other kids who share their interests,
expand geographical knowledge, gain broad cultural awareness, and
gain technical web experience in writing, coding, working with images,
and much more.
Such venues get kids past the techno-phobia that has crippled so
many adult careers. They provide an outlet for creativity (kids
at Poohblogs upload their writings for others to critique), and
they give kids what they need most: an opportunity and excuse to
write every day.
Now, I know that we are supposed to bemoan the loss of the quill
pen and parchment. We are supposed to weep because people no longer
ache over long letters and put wax seals on their missives. I know
how bad punctuation and crazy neologisms (LOL, brb, ttyl) are corrupting
English.
But punctuation and abbreviations are small technical problems
compared with the major issue that plagues bad writing: pomposity,
jargon, preachiness, and prose that is stilted and labored. These
are all the result of inexperience and a lack of direction and blogging
goes a long way toward addressing both problems.
What is true of blogs is also true of email. Don't tell me that
emails are too informal. Informal is far better than prose strewn
with words that the writer himself can't deploy with competence,
repeating words like "important" fifty times, as in: "At this stage
in my narrative, I find that it is important to note the important
distinction between what is important here and what is not."
Ask any English teacher from any age. The first articles they get
from students are riddled with these problems. The writer tries
to sound smart but just ends up sounding puffed up and absurd. They
have nothing to say, as if they composed the piece while forgetting
that the main point of writing is to communicate!
This is not only a problem in our time. Mark Twain famously satirized
the 19th-century approach to teaching writing in Tom Sawyer, in
his reporting of a schoolgirl's composition examination:
"A prevalent feature in these compositions was a nursed and petted
melancholy; another was a wasteful and opulent gush of 'fine language';
another was a tendency to lug in by the ears particularly prized
words and phrases until they were worn entirely out; and a peculiarity
that conspicuously marked and marred them was the inveterate and
intolerable sermon that wagged its crippled tail at the end of each
and every one of them."
And so Twain gives an example from the first girl who read her
composition:
"In the common walks of life, with what delightful emotions does
the youthful mind look forward to some anticipated scene of festivity!
Imagination is busy sketching rose-tinted pictures of joy. In
fancy, the voluptuous votary of fashion sees herself amid the
festive throng, 'the observed of all observers.' Her graceful
form, arrayed in snowy robes, is whirling through the mazes of
the joyous dance; her eye is brightest, her step is lightest in
the gay assembly. In such delicious fancies time quickly glides
by, and the welcome hour arrives for her entrance into the Elysian
world, of which she has had such bright dreams. How fairy-like
does everything appear to her enchanted vision! Each new scene
is more charming than the last. But after a while she finds that
beneath this goodly exterior, all is vanity."
To be sure, a high school student who wrote this well today would
be considered a genius. But it's still insufferable. It's artificial,
affected, puffed up, and vacuous.
Why do students write this way? They don't have an audience, they
don't have anything to say, and they haven't written enough to acquire
real skill.
Let's take the last point first. The acquisition of expertise in
any field is the product of relentless repetition. The World Series
in baseball, for example, is the culmination of tens of thousands
of batting sessions and casual games of catch in the backyard and
practice field. But somehow we tend to forget this with writing
and composition. The main experience kids have with it is through
a string of high-pressure performances: term papers for class.
Email is different. It is something you write every day. You fire
off answers in a flash. You keep them short. You write and write
and write, and you get your point across. Mostly you just do it
and do it, again and again, and you get better and better at it.
Writing becomes part of life, not a phony-baloney exercise you affect
to please an authority figure.
And yes, email overcomes the "something to say" problem too. The
purpose is to make a point of some sort, even if it is "my little
brother is driving me crazy!" That is far more substantive than
"imagination is busy sketching rose-tinted pictures of joy."
Finally, email provides an audience. Knowing who is going to read
what you are writing makes all the difference. A major cause of
"writer's block" is fear of what people you don't know will think
of what you say.
Kids need to know for whom they are writing in order to affect
the correct voice. The audience for email is listed right up top
in the "to:" bar.
The following happens all the time when people submit pieces to
Mises.org. Someone will send an incoherent piece, and I'll write
back: "What are you trying to say?" They will write back with a
crystal clear response, which forms the basis of a new draft. The
writer had an audience in mind and it made all the difference.
Try this at home. Ask you child to write a report on some topic.
Insist that it be 5 pages. If the kid is typical, he will labor
for days and turn in pap. Give that same kid a gmail account and
ask him to drop you an email about what he knows about lizards,
and you might find 5 pages arriving in less than an hour.
This is a wonderful and underappreciated medium! It should be exploited
by all parents and educators.
Far from killing literacy, email is producing the first fully literate
society in many eons, perhaps ever. Never before has it been so
necessary that every person in the whole of the population be capable
of writing well. For the first time in history, people are practicing
the craft on a daily basis, even from the youngest ages. The sooner
they begin, the better.
One
last word on this topic. Do not let kids type using an incorrect
method. Download TypingPal
for $20 and your kid will be typing well in a matter of weeks without
having to endure the horrors of typing class, which is another subject
entirely.
June
7, 2006
Jeffrey
Tucker [send him mail]
is editorial vice president of www.Mises.org.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Jeffrey
Tucker Archives
|