Is Lou Dobbs a Communist?
by
Mark Thornton
by Mark Thornton
Why
are people complaining about unemployment? Everyone seems to be
worried about jobs, especially now that the political campaign season
has begun. Alan Greenspan has assured us that he can see new jobs
right around the corner. The White House has proclaimed that 2.5
million jobs will soon be created. Is there reason to be so concerned
about unemployment?
Unemployment
is certainly a serious issue, but most complainers completely miss
the mark in terms of the causes and cures of unemployment. For example,
should Americans be worried that telephone-answering jobs are being
shipped overseas? No. Those telephone-answering jobs (think 1-800-technical
assistance) are not great jobs to begin with and they are going
to be increasingly phased out via automation. The President’s chief
economist, Greg Mankiw is correct outsourcing is good for the American
economy.
Should
we worry that the number of manufacturing jobs is plummeting? Three
million manufacturing jobs have been lost in the last four years
and the level of manufacturing employment is at its lowest level
in over 50 years. The rapid loss of manufacturing jobs has many
causes (its not free trade), but we must also remember that most
Americans no longer aspire to get a manufacturing job. Furthermore,
these jobs will continue to lose out to automation and foreign competition.
Yet,
every night Lou Dobbs drones on CNN about "broken borders"
and the outsourcing of American jobs to help drive up his show’s
ratings enough to save his own job. The Democratic presidential
candidate complains about the lack of good-paying jobs for Americans
while the Republican candidate takes credit for new job creation
and hopes that more will be created. Neither knows anything about
finding work or creating jobs. Protectionism, fair trade, government
education and retraining, and tax breaks will only make the job
market conditions worse.
Complaining
about jobs is an old tactic of the socialists and unions. What is
making this old rhetoric ring so resonantly in 2004? After all,
the official unemployment rate is now below the "natural rate."
We have been officially out of the recession for quite some time.
Why all the complaints?
To
understand the complaints, first take a look at the unemployment
rate. The graph below depicts the government’s best guess of what
the unemployment rate has been over the last half century. A rate
of 5.6% doesn’t seem that bad.
Civilian Unemployment Rate

Five
to Six percent is considered the "natural rate" of unemployment.
Anything over 6% is a sign of recession or depression. Anytime it
hits 4% or below it is usually a bad sign of economic boom or war.
The current rate of 5.6% is in the sweet spot of the business cycle.
However,
if we look at the number of people who are officially unemployed
we find a couple of million people who since 2001 are not too happy.
People are very fearful of unemployment compared to problems like
inflation and government deficits. In fact, Presidential elections
are often decided by the unemployment rate. If conditions in the
labor market worsen, Bush could end up like his father a
failed one-term president.
Unemployed:
16 Years & Over

The
data shows that the number of unemployed fell from 7.5 million to
5.5 million during the Clinton/Greenspan boom and then increased
by 4.5 million to more than 9 million in 2003 and it remains well
about the 8 million mark.
On
the positive side, the contraction-recession should be over with
by now according to historical averages, the number of unemployed
is decreasing and the number of people unemployed less than five
weeks is falling back to its normal level of about 2.5 million.
Civilians
Unemployed Less Than 5 Weeks

On
the negative side, the only reason we are statistically out of the
recession is government spending and consumer borrowing, neither
of which are a sound foundation for economic recovery. Also, the
number of people who have been unemployed for 15 weeks or more has
risen dramatically as shown in the graph below.
Civilians
Unemployed 15 Weeks & Over

The
drop of 500,000 in short-term unemployment is encouraging, but is
overshadowed by the increase in longer-term unemployment of nearly
2,000,000. As the length of unemployment increases people often
become "discouraged workers." These are people who would
and could work if jobs were available, but who are no longer actively
looking for work and therefore are no longer counted in the government’s
statistics. The average duration of unemployment has increased significantly
during the Bush recession (more than two weeks longer than average)
and it continues to increase.
Median
Duration of Unemployment

As
the duration of unemployment lengthens, more people become "discouraged"
and drop out of the official labor force. The drop in labor participation
rate from 67% to 66% over the last three years does not seem to
be a big deal, but that translates to more than 2 million people.
Civilian
Participation Rate

There
are many reasons why people drop out of the labor force, many of
which are good reasons like early retirement or raising a family.
However, the graph below suggests that lack of jobs probably dominates
in this case. The Help Wanted Index, which is a good indication
of the availability of jobs, is at its lowest level since the early
1960s.
Index
of Help Wanted Advertising in Newspapers

If
we put those 2 million people back into the labor force numbers
as unemployed, the unemployment rate increases from 5.6% to 7%.
The rate of 7% has only occurred six times since WWII and all six
were recessions. Of course the number of "discouraged"
workers has accumulated over time and is actually much larger than
the 2 million figure used here.
It
seems that Lou Dobbs does have something to crow about. Too bad
he has no idea what is causing the problem or how to cure it. The
cause of "unemployment" is government inflation,
debt, taxation, regulation, spending, the uncertainty and liability
it engenders, and war. The cure for unemployment is less
government, not more.
Disclaimer:
I am not a labor economist and employment statistics are not a precise
or even reliable indicator of employment markets. Also, I really
love my job, but I’ve always had a secret desire to be "bought
out" or "forced into early retirement."
All
data is available from FRED.
March
14, 2004
Mark
Thornton [send him mail]
is an economist who lives in Auburn, Alabama. He is author of The
Economics of Prohibition,
is a senior fellow with the Ludwig
von Mises Institute, and is the Book Review Editor for the Quarterly
Journal of Austrian Economics.
He is co-author of Tariffs,
Blockades, and Inflation: The Economics of the Civil War.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
Mark
Thornton Archives
|