What
Do They Think Will Happen?
by
Linda
Schrock Taylor
by Linda Schrock Taylor
"What
do elementary teachers think will happen to students who, lacking
basic reading and functional math skills, are passed on to higher
grades?"… "Do they even consider the implications, as well of the
effects, of unwarranted promotions?"… "Do elementary teachers just
assume that another teacher will pick up the 'dropped ball' and
remediate a child's problems at a later date?" These questions are
fair and on the lips of parents, taxpayers, even students.
As
with any group, there is variety and range in how elementary teachers
think and react. If a fifth category is included, this old proverb
provides assistance in understanding some of the reasons why schooling
problems persist, and worsen.
He
who knows not and knows not that he knows not is a fool. Shun
him.
He
who knows not and knows that he knows not is a child. Teach him.
He
who knows and knows not that he knows is asleep. Wake him.
He
who knows and knows that he knows is a wise man. Follow him.
He
who knows not and cares not that he knows not is dangerous. Remove
him.
THE
FOOLS (Who know not and know not that they know
not)
Increasing
numbers of such teachers 'graduate' from those foolish places that
pretend to be 'schools of education.' Too many would-be teachers
arrive at schools of 'miseducation' holding ACT/SAT scores from
the bottom rungs, and thus lack the intelligence and background
to even become teachers. Later, these compromised individuals, still
uneducated, head towards classrooms. They will have learned NOTHING
about the process of learning and intent of education; yet will
have become defined personally and educationally by
leftist agendas. They swallow hook, line, and sinker
the empty rhetoric pushed by professors who, themselves, have no
idea how to teach reading, spelling, writing or knowledge; how to
do diagnostic instruction and remediation; how to be introspective
and evaluate how well or how poorly one is performing; how
to wonder what will happen to children who leave their classrooms
without even the most basic skill necessary for meeting success
in school Reading!
The
extent to which most of these teachers will consider the lost opportunities
for the unfortunate students who passed through their classrooms,
is probably too miniscule to be measured. If they do think, they
will conclude that the child, rather than the teacher, is at fault.
For this reason, I label these damaged children as "Teacher Disabled"
rather than "Learning Disabled." The label "LD" unfairly suggests
that the child is the one with the problem.
Consider
this quote from Rita Kramer's 1991 book, Ed
School Follies: The Miseducation of America's Teachers
"Most
teachers agree, for example, that their job is not to hand on
to their students any specific body of knowledge or even to hone
any special academic skills. What they look forward to doing is
preparing the children for life in a new multi-cultural America
through methods and curricula designed to enhance self-esteem,
racial sensitivity, and social awareness. They wish to promote
social justice not by raising the educational level of
underprivileged youngsters but by making sure that everybody passes."
THE
CHILDREN (Who know not and know that they know not)
These
teachers number far fewer than those in the 'Fools' category. These
teachers do think, and do worry, about the future of the children
who have passed from them without having gained necessary skills
and knowledge. These teachers were never taught the methods for
successful teaching, but they realize that academic development
is not occurring as it should be. Many work for administrators who
also lack training; for those determined to undermine academic focus;
for those who demand that all teachers unquestioningly use techniques
and methods of failure.
Unless
these honorable, but unknowing, teachers meet someone who will teach
them better ideas, they will continue using counterproductive methods.
Many of these teachers are nearing the end of frustrating careers;
have already quit teaching; or have retired. Upon learning of the
importance for teaching the phonetic Code for the English language,
they feel regret and deep sadness. They mourn for all the children
they failed, through all the years that they taught. With discouragement
they admit, "Now I understand why I was not successful with all
the children. If only I had known then what I know now." Many are
still employed in schools and must continue using ineffective methods
of instruction, chosen by administrators for whom they work
even as the teachers, themselves, now know better.
THE
SLEEPING (Who know but know not that they know)
One
can awaken these individuals to the methods for effective education,
and they will begin to think about; to worry about; the children
who are passing through their classrooms untouched by the instruction.
However, these teachers find themselves in the same predicament
as those above, for they, too, work for administrators who insist
upon ineffective methods and non-academic goals.
THE
WISE (Who know and know that they know)
These
teachers are leaving public education in ever-growing numbers. They
are tormented by what will happen to the children who pass on without
skills and know that there is no magic cure-all waiting in the next
grade. These teachers grow frustrated working for inept, ill-trained
principals. With no power to bring about change, they close their
classroom doors against the craziness while they attempt to teach,
remediate and save children. The task is too enormous; the frustrations
too great. Unable to resign themselves to accepting mediocrity in
order to stay in good standing with administration and peers, they
exit the educational coliseum. Consider following them as they go.
THE
DANGEROUS (Who know not and care not that they know not)
This
group presents a great danger to schoolchildren and to the future
of this country. All they know about education is the spoon-fed
agenda from the schools of miseducation. But worse, these teachers
do not care to know anything different. While "Wise" ones research
and attempt to introduce better methods, the "Dangerous" ones refuse
to consider anything that might lift them out of their predetermined
ruts. They even refuse to order good materials that happen to be
sold by any group against which they have solidified their mindset.
Our seventh-grade teacher would challenge those afraid of new things
with: "You put me in mind of the man who wouldn't try peas for fear
that he would like them and he didn't like peas." One student,
hearing mention of such a teacher's name, spoke with sadness, "Ah,
HER room. Now THAT is the place to be held back." Even students
recognize these teachers for what they are not; for their persistence
in maintaining anti-instruction philosophies; anti-educational stances
and procedures. The students know, that to be assigned to those
teachers, means the death of hope.
"What
do elementary teachers think will happen to those children who are
passed on, even though they lack the ability to read?" In all likelihood,
most teachers just do not allow themselves to think that far into
the future. Many are incapable of such thought. Many blame the children
and the parents. Many teachers believe that since they followed
the mandates of the principal, used the provided materials and the
suggested methods they did all that should be expected of
them, and thus they are 'blameless.' To them, the fault lies with
the children who are seen as coming from bad homes where
parents failed to meet their responsibilities by having children
"ready for school."
As
sad as it is, THE BLAME GAME supersedes introspective thought, analysis,
and concern for the futures of the children. Dare the public hope
that government education is reform-able? Probably not. The Fools,
the Children, the Asleep and the Dangerous, are in lock step with
the dumbing-down philosophies. The Wise, in frustration, are leaving
at the soonest possible moment. The blind are being led by the blind,
so any chance for finding the light at the end of the tunnel is
dismal, at best. Do not count on a return to solid, meaningful,
academic foundations in government schools not now; probably
not ever.
July
28, 2003
Linda
Schrock Taylor [send
her mail] lives in Michigan.
She is a free-lance writer and the owner of "The Learning Clinic,"
where real reading, and real math, are taught effectively and efficiently.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Linda
Schrock Taylor Archives
|