Public School Administration
by
Linda
Schrock Taylor
by Linda Schrock Taylor
DIGG THIS
When a fellow
teacher stopped me in the hall to whisper a brief description of
the book he was reading, I listened. The book, he explained, discussed
individuals in positions of authority who abuse the trust that they
have been given, as well as the lives over which they rule.
The book explained
that the next-to-the-worst boss is the one whose goal is
to ruin an employee's tenure with the organization. The worst
type of boss is one whose goal is…to ruin an employee's life!
(We had spoken in rushed whispers for just this reason.)
Unfortunately
and too often, these types of people are working at some level in
public school administration. Unfortunately and in increasingly
greater numbers, such administrators are coming from the ranks of
the least intelligent; the least qualified; the least scholarly.
Tom Shuford explains in his article, GRE
Scores of School Administrators:
Mean Verbal-429,
Mean Quantitative-520, Total-949: These are the mean Graduate
Record Examination (GRE) scores of applicants for graduate study
in Education Administration tested between July 1, 2000 and June
30, 2003. Of 51 intended areas of graduate study, applicants in
45 fields had higher Total GRE scores than applicants
in Education Administration.
…Verbal and
Quantitative scores follow the same pattern. Applicants in 46
fields had higher Verbal scores than candidates in Education Administration.
Applicants in 4 fields had lower Verbal scores. (The data
seem to explain why articles and Op-Eds by education administrators
are extreme rarities.)
…What do
the data on Graduate Record Examination scores of aspiring Education
Administrators mean? What do the data tell us about the quality
of decision-making in state education departments, in district
central offices and in principals' offices? How are curricula,
textbooks, instructional programs, teachers impacted by school
leaders with such academic aptitude scores?
…But for
all their limitations, the GRE and the SAT measure what they purport
to measure with some success. There is, therefore, a special irony
if as seems certain from the data we are selecting
as heads of our K-12 academic institutions, individuals who demonstrate
negligible academic promise.
Let me repeat
those questions… "What do the data tell us about the quality
of decision-making in state education departments, in district central
offices and in principals' offices? How are curricula, textbooks,
instructional programs, teachers impacted by school leaders with
such academic aptitude scores"?
Such questions
are of great importance for there are currently thousands of teachers;
millions of pupils; under the control of these low-scoring candidates,
many of whom are not only inept, but defensive; retaliatory; and
manipulative.
Such questions
are also important since public schooling shows greater failure
rates with each passing year. These failure rates mean greater numbers
of illiterate and uneducated citizens; which mean increased numbers
of persons who barely exist, and most certainly fail to meet
potential and so fail to thrive in life. Every year more taxes are
taken from working people in order to support growing numbers of
welfare-dependent individuals and rapidly expanding prison populations.
Such questions
and their answers are of greatest importance since, in the process
of pondering them, intelligent, reflective persons will discover
yet more reasons for the steady decline of America and of the American
way of life. More will note exactly where the blame should be placed.
Rational people will come to the conclusion that the era of mass
public schooling should come to an end, and the sooner, the better.
Too few people
are aware that the most capable teachers and administrators – those
who understand the real issues in education and seek to effectively
solve the problems – have their hands tied by inappropriate leaders
and bad legislation, at all levels. Many skilled individuals not
only have their hands tied but their mouths gagged. Without their
voices, they cannot speak the truth and warn parents; without their
hands they cannot protect throats that are, figuratively, in danger
of being slit.
At all levels,
the actions of too many administrators prove that Tom Shuford's
concerns are valid. Such administrators hire non-assertive teachers
who will pose no threat to the system, or to administrative power,
even if such screening denies students the opportunity to be taught
with excellence. Too many listen to gossip, tossing out positive
recommendations in order to support their refusals to hire teachers
who could bring literacy and scholarship back to public schools.
Too many spread distortions fueled by personal agendas. Some just
prefer to "stay out of it" rather than hire a teacher who a fellow
administrator has blacklisted and is attempting to destroy. Neither
common decency nor integrity is expected of administrators, anymore.
"Curiously,
the mean Total GRE score of applicants for graduate study in Education
broadly-speaking is 981. That of aspiring Education
Administrators: 949. That might make for some interesting differences
of opinion on curricular issues." Shuford
Ask any teacher
you know to be capable of teaching any willing learner, and capable
of motivating most students to become more interested in learning.
Ask any teacher you know to be a real scholar in life, both personally
and professionally. Ask any teacher who spends time researching
and learning better methods for better instruction. Ask any teacher
who sees through shallow and irrelevant teacher development
inservices; teacher training classes; No Child Left Behind
mandates. Ask them if they have any differences of opinion, interesting
or otherwise, with their administrators.
Ask those teachers…but
do it quickly – for with each new batch of administrators that slide
through education schools and into positions for which they possess
few scholarly or leadership qualifications, more capable teachers
leave the field.
If you can
find talented teachers who are willing to talk; who dare to talk;
you will discover that most are now, or have been at some point
in their careers, on the hit list of a less-than-smart, more-than-devious,
small-minded administrator.
Many teachers
elect to leave teaching rather than work for administrators who
are incapable of even researching educational problems, let alone
solving them. In fact, too often administrators resent any teacher
who would, and could, improve the school. The worst, as exposed
in my friend's book, would rather oust and destroy their arch enemies
– teachers who erroneously believe that schools were designed to
educate the populace; the citizenry; for literate, wise participation
in a republic – and any teachers who vocalize that conclusion.
Many teachers,
too often the bright ones, leave the field of education within the
first five years of teaching. Others stay longer, often at great
personal and professional sacrifice, for they view teaching as a
mission. Many of those teachers began their careers back in the
good ole days, working for fine administrators who have now
retired, leaving committed teachers at the mercy of saucy upstarts.
Every year, retirement and early-retirement further reduce the numbers
of skilled teachers who are willing to work in public miseducation.
Jeffrey Weld
explains in his article, Attracting
and Retaining High-Quality Professionals In Science Education
The average
number of years in the classroom that beginning chemistry teachers
endure is an alarmingly short four years, according to a 1993
RAND Corporation study, and the average is only slightly better
for physics and biology teachers.1
Teacher attrition across the disciplines is a serious problem,
but it is particularly acute in the sciences, and it is particularly
disturbing when the teachers who leave are talented and reflective
people. Any teacher can tell stories about "the good ones" who
have left the classroom – whether to "move up" to administration
or to leave education altogether. A study of 13,000 teachers who
began their careers in Michigan during the 1970s revealed that
only 56% were still teaching after six years. For chemistry teachers,
the figure was 49%.2
Furthermore, an older study showed that those with higher scores
on the National Teacher Exam had stayed in teaching less time
than those with low scores.3
Eventually
the teachers who remain in the classrooms will mostly be: young,
inexperienced, non-tenured, unwilling to speak the truth/fearful
of losing their jobs. Then…getting back to testing, this time to
look at SAT scores…we are confronted with this problem:
The Math
SAT: As would be expected, Mathematics majors scored highest
of all the majors on the Math portion, with a 626 point average.
They soundly trounced the Language and Literature majors, who
were 76 points behind. But here's the kicker: Language and Literature
scored 67 points higher in Math than Education majors!
Not to put
too fine a point on it, but well over half of future teachers
will end up either teaching math or a math-heavy field
such as science. Meanwhile future linguists, authors, and literature
critics might not ever see another equation in their life.
And yet with
Euclidian aplomb they fairly kicked Education majors' butts (by
1.75 standard deviations, no less).
Ok, we hear
your protests. Not every teacher will teach math, granted. So
let's look at the Verbal scores.
The Verbal
SAT: Here, Language and Literature majors got their reciprocity,
outperforming all other majors with a score of 603. Mathematics
majors were forced to lick their wounds 58 points back. But (and
you knew this was coming) the Math majors came off as quite cultured
in comparison to our soon-to-be public school teachers, beating
Education majors by 63 Verbal points!
This is embarrassing.
It could
be worse: In a comparison of 21 college categories (we're
eliminating the non-college categories of "Home Economics" and
"Technical and Vocational") Education majors come in third-to-last
place on the Math portion. Only "Agriculture or Natural Resources"
and "Public Affairs and Services" majors scored worse.
In the Verbal
portion – which should be a teacher's strong point, or so we thought
– Education majors took the silver medal in the race for last
place. "Public Affairs and Services" again occupied the basement.
http://www.reformk12.com/archives/000094.nclk
Wait! It gets
worse. In his article The
Truth About Grade Inflation, Bruce Bartlett explains:
According
to the College Entrance Examination Board, the average combined
score on the Scholastic Assessment Test (formerly known as the
Scholastic Aptitude Test) has fallen from 1059 in 1967 to 1020
in 2002. However, this greatly understates the magnitude of the
decline because in 1995 the SAT was "renormed." In practice, this
statistical legerdemain added 100 points to everyone's score –
76 points to the verbal score and 24 points to the math score.
What this means is that for anyone who took the SAT before 1995,
if you want to know how well you would do today you must add 100
points. Keep this in mind when some friend brags about how well
his child did on the test. You can knock 100 points off for grade
inflation in comparison to how your generation did.
ReformK12 concludes:
"Now isn't it about time we dismantle 'Schools of Education' nationwide,
and actually permit college students who major in something else
(anything else but government) to become teachers? Please?"
Shuford concludes:
"We select leaders for our school systems from a pool of individuals
whose standardized test scores are not only among the lowest in
education-related fields but are among the lowest in all academe.
This is lunacy."
With such people
in the seats of power there is no hope that any plan, of any kind,
will ever successfully reform public education.
Let
us keep this all in mind each and every time we are asked to vote
for millage increases; to support public schools in any way.
August
28, 2006
Linda
Schrock Taylor [send
her mail] is an educational
consultant, homeschooling mom, and public school special ed teacher.
She is available for presentations, inservices, and workshops.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Linda
Schrock Taylor Archives
|