Throwing
Some Reader Mail on the Barbie
by
Vin Suprynowicz
by Vin Suprynowicz
DIGG THIS
My
recent column
on the curious lack of international coverage of the death of Rod
Ansell (the man who became the real-life model for the movie character
"Crocodile Dundee") in a 1999 shoot-out with Aussie police
brought some "attaboys" ...
"Hello
Vin, Great article. I did some research (Google) on that death a
few years ago and came to the same conclusion. The gumint criminalized
him and as a result, he decided to go down shooting. Not one of
the articles I read made that obvious connection. I remember that
the agent who killed him (justifiable if I recall correctly because
Mr. Ansell killed his partner) was genuinely puzzled as to why Mr.
A chose not to avoid a police roadblock which he could have done
easily. No doubt that he cannot understand the Iraqi resistance
or any other resistance to authorities who stomp on basic rights.
Keep up the good work. – R.E."
... but also
some curiously clone-like responses each citing the same government-funded
Australian TV "documentary" on Ansell’s death. To wit:
"I agree
with you that Rod Ansell’s story deserves further media coverage,
but I am sorry to see you repeating the baloney written by Dr. Faria.
"Don’t
get me wrong, I am not a gun control advocate. But the accounts
I have seen of Ansell’s tragic end clearly show that it had nothing
to do with gun control unless you might want an argument for keeping
guns out of the hands of drug-crazed people. A believable report
on Ansell’s crazed attack, his murder of a police officer, and his
subsequent death was
presented by the ABC ‘Four Corners’ investigative reporting team.
"They
interviewed eye witnesses (the people Ansell attacked and who saw
him killed) as well as acquaintances and associates of Ansell who
tell of his meth-crazed state. I’m amazed that you would waste space
on Dr. Faria’s fantasy. ...
"By the
way, Australia is not a ‘leftist’ country as Dr. Faria states. The
governing party is conservative. Perhaps Dr. Faria is confused by
the name of the governing conservative party, the ‘Liberal Party’
(note the capital L). The liberal party (note the lower case l)
is called the ‘Australian Labour Party.’
"If you
are interested in Australian gun control, you ought to read their
(very complicated) laws yourself. You will find that ‘ban’ is too
strong a word." – (signed) Stan C.
Readers are
welcome to wade through the transcript of the Australian broadcast
for themselves. In between a lot of talk about Brucellosis and Mimosa
and "bitumen" will be found a few persons whose backgrounds
and motivations we’re told nothing about, not testifying under oath,
saying shots came into their house the night before Ansell died,
and they didn’t know at the time who was doing the shooting.
How do they
know, now, that it was Ansell? The police told them, presumably.
Perhaps Mr.
Ansell did have a screw loose. I don’t know. Certainly no one is
advised to get into gun battles with police, unless under the direst
provocation.
But I wonder
if any other reader or viewer gets the impression that the narrator
of this oddly constructed presentation – from the "Australian
Broadcasting Corporation," an outfit which admits to being
"funded almost entirely by direct annual grants from the Australian
federal budget" – will not be found out on the picket lines,
protesting in favor of the God-given right to unrestricted gun ownership,
anytime soon?
What is clear
is that narrator "Peter George" is convinced everything
is explained by Ansell’s "darkening moods" and the fact
that Northern Australia is "no longer a frontier." (Could
that be code language for "and now these yahoos have to give
up their guns," do you suppose?)
Readers of
the transcript will find speculation that Ansell "might have
been" smoking "a lot of marijuana" – though I’ve
never seen any reliable information that pot smoking causes folks
to become homicidal maniacs.
Meantime, I
seem to have missed any documentation of his "meth-crazed state,"
which would surely be easy enough to prove from autopsy results.
I don’t know
enough about Peter George and how predictably he and his government-paid
network parrot a politically correct government line to comment
further on this disembodied piece of work. I do know I saw a young
woman testify UNDER OATH before a U.S. Senate committee in 1990
that Iraqi troops pulled babies out of the hospital incubators after
invading Kuwait – only to later learn that the testifying "nurse
Nayirah" was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador
to Washington (next-door neighbor to Sen. Edward Kennedy), a young
woman who had apparently been home in her palatial Northern Virginia
estate during the time in question, not doing volunteer work in
any Kuwaiti hospital.
I’ve also watched
network TV news specials (in America, at least they PRETEND not
to be government apologists) asserting that Christian minister David
Koresh and his Branch Davidian followers decided to "commit
suicide" by burning themselves and their children to death
at Mount Carmel, TX, on (what a coincidence!) the same day the FBI
and the Delta Force collapsed the church staircases with armored
vehicles, injected nerve gas in a flammable suspension, and lit
the place up with incendiary grenades, while holding the fire engines
miles away.
I feel certain
if the Nazis were still in power, we would also be regaled today
with mainstream German TV documentaries on how the Jews committed
suicide in the concentration camps despite the best efforts of their
compassionate guards to stop them.
I haven’t gone
to Australia to investigate the Ansell death. I’ve e-mailed Dr.
Miguel Faria, whose essay on the topic was cited in my original
column, to ask if he has further documentation as to whether and
why Ansell may have been worried his guns would be seized (which
doesn’t sound at all far-fetched to me; I’ve seen the proudly publicized
photos of thousands of seized Australian semi-auto shotguns and
hunting rifles being crushed, bent, and destroyed.)
Had many of
Mr. Ansell’s guns been banned, or not? Were police at the time confiscating
"illegal" guns, or not? If they’d pulled him over and
found those rifles in his vehicle, without proper "permits
and documentation," what would have happened? Would they have
said, "Oh, that’s all right then – you can go"?
And if Ansell’s
firearms WERE subject to confiscation for failure to "register"
them (as has been widely reported) what are the chances our TV narrator
"Peter George" would have emphasized that in his report?
I believe we’ll
have to rule the link between Ansell’s death and Australia’s accelerating
gun control at the time "not proven," for now – though
I still find it interesting that Mr. Ansell’s highly colorful death
has received virtually no international coverage, by a press that’s
overwhelmingly opposed to gun rights – a press that (in contrast)
gave us wall-to-wall coverage a few weeks back of a perfectly nice
but risk-addicted Australian zookeeper being stung by a fish.
Meantime, I’m
certainly glad to hear Australia is not a "leftist" country.
No more graduated income tax, no more cradle-to-grave redistributionist
social welfare programs and tax-funded old-age pensions, no more
socialized medicine, no more government-funded welfare schooling?
Congratulations!
I’m
also very glad to hear the rumor that certain guns have been "banned"
in Australia proves to have been overblown. So the average citizen
there can still own a semi-automatic or fully automatic FN-FAL or
L1A1 or M-14 or M-1A without any requirement to register them or
apply for any special "license" to carry them around in
the truck? Mighty glad to hear it ... assuming that’s not just some
"meth-crazed fantasy," mind you.
September
26, 2006
Vin
Suprynowicz [send
him mail] is assistant editorial page editor of the daily Las
Vegas Review-Journal and author of The
Black Arrow.
Copyright
© 2006 Vin Suprynowicz
Vin
Suprynowicz Archives
|