Dangerous
Worm Peddler Nabbed
by
Vin Suprynowicz
by Vin Suprynowicz
DIGG THIS
Make no mistake,
when it comes time to count the faces that delegates to our state
capitals see in hearing after hearing, plain old taxpayers clinging
tightly to their checkbooks are vastly outnumbered by bureaucrats
on the government pad. (After all, the bureaucrats don’t have to
"take time off work" to be there – that IS their work.)
And so it begins
to sound to our elected delegates like an endless and nearly unanimous
song – more money is needed, because the public "demands more
services."
Joey Cadieux
of Cromwell, Connecticut got "serviced" by his local government,
this month.
For some years,
Joey has posted a hand-stenciled, black-and-white sign in his yard
each summer. The sign, posted over by the tree, says "NITE
CRAWLERS." Joey journeys outside on damp nights with his flashlight
to dig the big wigglers, sells them to local fishermen, and pockets
about $7 to $10 per month – enough to occasionally bicycle down
and treat himself at the local pizza place.
But in July,
Al Diaz, a member of the town Planning and Zoning Commission, mentioned
during a meeting that Joey’s sign does not comply with Cromwell’s
zoning regulations, and should come down. A town zoning officer
took heed, sending a letter last month ordering Joey’s stepfather,
August Reil, to take the sign down.
"In a
residential zone, if you want to put up a business and work out
of your home, you need a special permit," Diaz told The Hartford
Courant in a story published Aug. 11. "You come before the
commission and state your case ... and then a decision is made.
Chiropractors do that, lawyers do that, doctors do that. ..."
Joey is 13.
If Joey’s stepfather wants to plead his case before the Zoning Board
of Appeals, he will have to pay a $130 filing fee – about five years’
earnings from young Joey’s summer worm business. He has refused.
"I pay
thousands and thousands of dollars in taxes, so why should we have
to pay to appeal something we didn’t even know we were doing wrong?"
he asks.
Cromwell Town
Planner Craig Minor admits the lad’s enterprise resembles a farm
stand, which doesn’t require a permit, or seasonal activities like
a volunteer fireman’s barbecue, which can be advertised without
regulation. It may be covered by a clause allowing activities which
are "customary and incidental to home ownership," he further
admits.
Cromwell First
Selectman Paul Beaulieu has also taken young Joey’s side, commenting
"I would hope that reason would prevail, and that both lemonade
stands and nightcrawler signs are seen as part of summertime traditions
here in central Connecticut."
Given that
Joey’s story has drawn nationwide attention, it’s a safe bet Mr.
Diaz – who now admits "I had no idea there was a 13-year-old
kid there" – will reverse his position, come September.
But for every
Joey Cadieux with the contacts and the savvy and the fortuitous
timing to garner nationwide media attention, there are thousands
more who quietly relent when the letter comes in the mail, hang
their heads in defeat, give up their entrepreneurial ambitions,
and find something else to do.
Spray-painting
graffiti seems a popular alternative.
I know Cromwell.
I once played rock ’n roll with some lads from Cromwell. I spent
a year or two as a night clerk at the Lord Cromwell Motor Inn. The
town of Cromwell, a pleasant and modestly upscale Connecticut River
backwater with a population of about 13,000, has been there for
two-and-a-half centuries. If a "planner" were needed,
he should have been employed sometime before the Civil War. Believe
me, Cromwell has no current need of a "town planner" –
an office unheard of in the small towns of that region as little
as 40 years ago – let alone a staff of subsidiary "zoning officers"
with enough time on their hands to send letters to 13-year-old boys.
Once hired,
such regulators must be kept busy. Next year, do not fear, more
will be hired in the central Connecticut region – along with some
graffiti abatement workers, and numerous additional social workers
and probation officers and juvenile court functionaries to deal
with kids who get into trouble because they have too much time on
their hands, and no lawful means to earn a few bucks.
And
what reason will be given? Why, "increased demand for their
services," of course.
September
2, 2006
Vin
Suprynowicz [send
him mail] is assistant editorial page editor of the daily Las
Vegas Review-Journal and author of The
Black Arrow.
Copyright
© 2006 Vin Suprynowicz
Vin
Suprynowicz Archives
|