Thought
Crimes
by
Vin Suprynowicz
by Vin Suprynowicz
DIGG THIS
On Aug. 23,
a teen here in the Las Vegas valley received an e-mail from a Henderson
14-year-old asking "Would you be up for some Columbine-like
(expletive)."
"Like
what we talking?" asked his admirably articulate correspondent.
"I can’t
talk to you online about it," responded the original sender,
showing some tardy discretion. "But how can I hit you up offline?"
A relative
of the teen who received the message phoned police. At 9:30 p.m.
on Aug. 23 Henderson police went to the home of the 14-year-old
who sent the original message, arrested him, and took him to the
Clark County Juvenile Detention Center, where he was booked on charges
of making threats or conveying false information concerning acts
of terrorism.
The teen, who
has not been identified, had surveillance footage of the Columbine
High School shootings – easily found on the Internet – on his home
computer, according to Henderson police spokesman Todd Rasmussen.
He had named his MySpace.com Web page "R.I.P. Eric Harris and
Dylan Klebold," for the two teens who killed 12 students and
a teacher before committing suicide at the Colorado high school
in 1999.
Detectives
learned the boy has been suspended from school in years past for
fighting, threatening other students, and "using slurs."
At the time of his arrest, he was wearing a shirt that bore the
words "Kill Hate Destroy."
"The detectives
took this seriously because in their minds this wasn’t a hoax,"
Rasmussen said. "This was a very early stage in the thought
process of a disturbed child that needed help. ... He displayed
tendencies that were parallel to those of other suspects in other
school shootings."
Yes, it does
sound like the young man needs some serious talking-to, and perhaps
a change in environment. But is jail really the place he’s likely
to get that "help"? And – while it’s good the message
wasn’t ignored – what other "tendencies" can now land
a kid in jail? Wearing too much dark clothing? Listening to heavy
metal? Failure to toast marshmallows and sing "Kum-ba-ya"?
Some of those
sound like jokes, till we recall that, in today’s Alice-in-Wonderland
government-school environment, kids have actually been suspended
from school (I’ve never quite grasped that – are inmates punished
for minor infractions by being sent home from prison?) and forwarded
for psychological counseling for the offense of doodling cartoons
of fighter jets strafing platoons of scrambling stick figures.
Wow. Good thing
no one inspected MY notebooks when I was 12 or 13.
In 2002, Steven
Spielberg made a successful film – starring Tom Cruise – of the
Philip K. Dick short story Minority
Report, depicting a science fiction world in which "criminals"
are arrested before they’ve committed their crimes, based on the
testimony of psychics who are able to read their minds and see the
future.
Perhaps fortunately,
this world has no such psychics available, and so we empower our
police to jail people only when they’ve committed some palpable
wrongful act.
No, that doesn’t
mean everyone has to sit by till a massacre occurs. But "would
you be up for some (expletive)?" is not a threat by any known
definition. No guns or explosives were found, no maps or other detailed
plans.
Fourteen-year-old
adolescent males often talk big, fantasizing about war and violence.
Endless hours playing bloody video games can’t help – though it
should be noted that earlier generations of youths thrilled to campfire
tales that could be almost as gory.
Yes, responsible
adults can and should ask why some kids seem so focused on violent
fantasies. Parents come first to mind, though a teacher or coach
or pastor or grandparent can always pitch in.
A grown-up
encouraging a boy to voice his concerns and frustrations, perhaps
even some of his guilty fantasies – assuring the lad that such stuff
is perfectly normal, and discussing alternatives if school itself
is the problem – can do a lot to convince a troubled youth that
he’s not nuts, that he has options other than a spectacular suicide.
It’s the ones
who keep everything bottled up who seem most likely to finally "lose
it." So do we really want to teach them that speaking up will
land them in jail?
Meantime, given
that crimes like Columbine would have been unthinkable 40 or 50
years ago, it may be past time to ask whether there’s something
about the way our teen-age boys are held and treated in today’s
compulsory yet far-from-intellectually-challenging government schools
– as many as 50 percent of them doped up on Prozac or Luvox or Ritalin
to curb what sure looks like a "fight-or-flight" response
– that may lie at the heart of this problem.
Are these behaviors
rarer among boys whose fathers spend more time with them, taking
them camping and shooting, hunting and fishing? They seem to be
virtually unknown among home schoolers and those attending private
schools.
The
vast majority of such youths are not and never will become killers
or criminals. Toying with bad or even ugly thoughts is not a crime.
If it were, we’d need a lot more jails for all those video game
designers.
September
5, 2006
Vin
Suprynowicz [send
him mail] is assistant editorial page editor of the daily Las
Vegas Review-Journal and author of The
Black Arrow.
Copyright
© 2006 Vin Suprynowicz
Vin
Suprynowicz Archives
|