No
Robot Cops
by
Vin Suprynowicz
by Vin Suprynowicz
Chad
Dornsife, Silver State spokesman for the National
Motorists Association, called me a few weeks back about Senate
Bill 473, which would allow Nevada speeding tickets to be issued
by robot cameras you could get one in the mail without ever
knowing you'd been "nabbed."
I
checked back with him for a progress report last week.
"It's
over to the Assembly Judiciary Committee," Chad explained, "and
what I'm afraid of is that they'll hold it till the rules are suspended"
(near the end of the session) "to vote on it, so that way they don't
have to have any public hearings or take any public comment. ...
"Even
(Republican state Sen. Bob) Beers said, 'I was originally against
it, but it's only gonna be a two-year trial'; he voted for it,"
Dornsife continues. "So let me get this straight: It's OK to steal
from people for two years, if it's not about safety, if it's all
about revenue, and it turns loose a scourge on society."
But
much as we all hate getting a ticket can't laws against
speeding and red-light-running actually improve safety, I asked?
"There's
four studies now that show not only do the cameras not reduce accident
rates, they actually increase accident rates, because people start
slamming on their brakes and overreacting when they see that there's
a camera," Dornsife replies. "There are four studies now."
Dornsife
refers me to TheNewspaper.com,
an interesting site on the topic where these studies are posted,
currently leading off with a story datelined May 18 and reporting:
"Ohio
House Votes to Ban Red Light Cameras"
"The Ohio
House of Representatives voted 72-23 to approve a bill by state
Representative Jim Raussen, R-Springdale, today that would effectively
prohibit the use of red light cameras and speed cameras in the
state. ... The House also voted 92-4 to add a provision standardizing
yellow signal timing to the ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers)
recommendations.
"The amendment's
sponsor, Rep. Shawn Webster, cited the Texas Transportation Institute
study showing longer yellow times decreased accidents. Raussen
argued that the photo enforcement represented 'a program that
at best has questionable results.' He cited ... studies which
show red light camera use actually increased the number of accidents.
..."
Back
on the phone, Chad Dornsife continued: "What's happened is, the
federal government has produced two new studies that say the cameras
improve safety, but they excluded all the negative findings. The
father of cameras in this country is the Insurance Agency for Highway
Safety and their man, (Senior Transportation Engineer) Richard Retting.
It's like a scientist working for the tobacco industry telling us
why tobacco is safe.
"The
numbers are coming in from Great Britain," Dornsife went on. "In
a country of 33 million people, these excess citations for revenue
are generating increased insurance premiums of $2 billion per year,
because you're able to add surcharges to your insurance premiums,
and the IAHS that promotes these cameras is financed by the insurance
companies that are the primary beneficiary of these insurance surcharges.
"And
the other group, the National Stop Red Light Running Program, is
financed by the camera manufacturers. But the cameras need a sustained,
a consistent high level of violations to make them financially viable.
All you have to do is adjust the yellow light, lengthen it by a
second" which also reduces accidents "and it makes
them not financially viable," Dornsife contends.
Dornsife's
group "has a $10,000 reward to any city that will fix the signal
timing, lengthen the yellow lights to reduce accidents and red-light
running, and no city will take us up on it because that's chump
change compared to the money they're going to get" from the robot
cameras, which churn out and mail presumed-guilty tickets to car
owners without a police officer even having to witness the offense.
"This
law will also allow speed cameras in cars," Dornsife adds. "Washington,
D.C., with six patrol vehicles equipped with these automatic cameras,
wrote 80,000 tickets in one month. They can write in excess of 200
tickets an hour; they just sit on some street that's under-posted,
they just mail the tickets. The owner of the car gets a ticket,
and you're guilty till proven innocent. If you're a small business
owner with 10 vehicles, regardless of who was driving, you've got
to pay it."
Since
1999, according to the anti-robot Web site, robot cameras in Washington,
D.C., have issued more than 1.7 million tickets, leeching an additional
$105 million from local drivers' pockets.
Chad
Dornsife can be reached at P.O. Box 141, Zephyr Cove, NV 89448.
May
23, 2005
Vin
Suprynowicz [send
him mail] is assistant editorial page editor of the daily Las
Vegas Review-Journal and author of The
Black Arrow.
Copyright
© 2005 Vin Suprynowicz
Vin
Suprynowicz Archives
|