War,
Peace, and the State
by
Joseph R. Stromberg
by Joseph R. Stromberg
I.
Introduction
This
essay lists essential historical readings on wars (and related matters)
which have involved or affected the United States (plural), starting
in 1776. The framework is a Rothbardian one, in which wars are not
sealed off from domestic politics, the ambitions of state bureaucrats,
economic life and motives, and ideological currents. The perspective
chosen is broadly "revisionist," although general works
are included which will add to the reader’s overall knowledge of
the subject. I begin with a chronological listing of works dealing
with America’s wars – hot and cold – and go on to a thematic listing
of works on statism and war, propaganda, and unconventional war.
Our goal is to present, in one place, a broad bibliography of works
which go against conformist "liberal-internationalist"
– and now one would have to add "neo-conservative" – readings
of the history of US foreign relations.
"Revisionism"
is, simply put, part of an ongoing improvement of our historical
knowledge.
Any
new interpretation, right or wrong, amounts to a revision of some
previously accepted view. In the case of foreign affairs, revisionism
is of critical importance. Each official reading of a war becomes
an honored precedent to be referred to when debating any new situation
which could give rise to war. Thus, US policy-makers typically believe,
or pretend to believe, that any new crisis comes down to a case
of Fort Sumter, 1861, or Munich, 1938. It follows, then, that whatever
was done at such times provides valuable guidance. Anyone who doubts
this is invited to note the many references to World War II, Pearl
Harbor, Lincoln, and so on, which have filled the press since September
11, 2001.
Official
readings can even be arranged into a seamless series exhibiting
the same causes and, therefore, demanding the same or analogous
responses. Thus is created a sort of "myth of the eternal return"
with respect to US foreign relations. In this mythical world, the
United States bumbles along amiably – and in utter conformity with
international law and high-minded principles – for years at a time,
when it is "suddenly and deliberately attacked" out of
the blue, for no discernible reason, by forces of total evil. If
the seamless web of US innocent-bystanderhood is broken, however,
things take on a far different look. This is all to the good, as
it makes possible a genuine understanding of our situation and,
at the same time, makes it possible to think of alternatives to
officially offered policy options, which are usually limited to
sanctions, bombing, more bombing, or invasion.
The
late Murray Rothbard made a useful distinction between "narrow"
and "broad" revisionism as regards US foreign relations.
Those of the former school concerned themselves with the causes
of the two world wars. Without a broader framework such writers
fell prey to the Cold War, or any other cause or crusade, provided
only that it was unconnected with European affairs from 1914-1945.
Broad revisionists, by contrast, concerned themselves with wars
and the causes of wars, generally, and were thus led to question
much conventional wisdom about states, international relations,
and the formation of public opinion.
Thus,
it is no accident that libertarians – with their critical view of
states and state behavior – should be among those interested in
war and imperialism, both of which represent a widening of state
power – first abroad, and then at home. War and empire, whatever
immediate benefits they confer on those in position to enjoy such
benefits, multiply the opportunities for a state to extend its power
over its "own" citizens and their wealth. Libertarians
and classical liberals have not had this field all to themselves,
however. Old-line Progressives like Charles Beard and Harry Elmer
Barnes, for example, became great critics of the drive to intervention
in 1939-1941, and found themselves allied with right-wing Republicans
with whom they previously had little in common.
Similarly,
Leftists and Marxists sometimes ask very good questions about the
interest and motivation of political actors and states and do very
useful research on the basis of such questions. We may profit from
their work, while disagreeing with their ultimate values. Here,
we are interested in useful books and essays which shed light on
war and peace. There is not enough space to analyze or quarrel with
the politics of each item listed. The discerning reader will have
to make allowance for such things.
The
net has been cast fairly wide here, in the direction of the broadest
possible revisionism. Useful "mainstream" works are also
cited from time to time. No pretense is made of providing "balance":
the Court Intellectuals and the kept media dominate the discussion
and finding their works is no hardship for readers unsympathetic
with our purposes. The end product is, I hope, a politically varied
but thematically focused list of readings on war, peace, and states.
II.
General Histories and Diplomatic Histories
Thomas
A. Bailey, A
Diplomatic History of the American People (Englewood Cliffs,
N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974) and Alexander DeConde, A
History of American Foreign Policy, 2nd edition (New York:
Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1971) are mainstream works. More critical
are William Appleman Williams, The
Contours of American History (New York: New Viewpoints,
1973) and The
Shaping of American Diplomacy, 2 volumes (Chicago: Rand
McNally, 1956), William Appleman Williams, ed., From
Colony to Empire: Essays in the History of American Foreign Relations
(New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1972), and Walter LaFeber, The
American Age: United States Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad Since
1750 (New York: W.W. Norton, 1989). The
Anti-Imperialist Reader: A Documentary History of Anti-Imperialism
in the United States, 2 volumes, eds. Philip S. Foner and
Richard C. Winchester (New York: Homes and Meier, 1984) is a useful
collection of documents. See also, Arthur A. Ekirch Jr., The
Decline of American Liberalism (New York: Atheneum, 1969),
The
Civilian and the Military: A History of the American Antimilitarist
Tradition (Colorado Springs: Ralph Myles, 1972), and Ideas,
Ideals, and American Diplomacy (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts,
1966).
III.
The American Revolution, 1776-1783
For
the American Revolution, see William F. Marina, "Militia, Standing
Armies and the Second Amendment," Law and Liberty, 2,
4 (Spring 1976), pp. 1-4, and "Revolution and Social Change:
The American Revolution As a People’s War," Literature of
Liberty, I, 2 (April-June 1978), pp. 5-39, which stress the
role of partisan warfare in the struggle. [More will be added here,
eventually.]
IV.
The War for Southern Independence: 1861-1865
For
the complex ideological, political, and economic causes of the "Civil"
War, see Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, Emancipating
Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the American Civil War
(Chicago: Open Court, 1996), Joseph R. Stromberg, "The
War for Southern Independence: A Radical Libertarian Perspective,"
Journal of Libertarian Studies, 3, 1 (1979), 31-53, and John
S. Rosenberg, "Toward A New Civil War Revisionism" in
Gerald N. Grob and George Athan Bilias, eds., Interpretations
of American History, I (New York: The Free Press, 1972),
459-479.
The
essays in David Gordon, ed., Secession,
State and Liberty (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers,
1998) are very useful, in particular Murray N. Rothbard, "Nations
by Consent: Decomposing the Nation-State," pp. 79-88. See as well
Richard Gamble, "Rethinking Lincoln," pp. 135-144, Thomas Fleming,
"Did the South Have to Fight?", pp. 145-154, and Clyde Wilson, "War,
Reconstruction and the End of the Old Republic," pp. 155-167, all
in John V. Denson, ed., The
Costs of War, 2d ed. (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers,
1999). Finally, Charles Adams puts revenue issues on center stage
in When
in the Course of Human Events: Arguing the Case for Southern Secession
(Lanham, Mass.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000).
For
military aspects of the war, see R. Kerby, "Why the Confederacy
Lost the Civil War," Review of Politics, 35, 3 (July
1973), 326-45, Richard E. Beringer, Herman Hattaway, Archer Jones,
and William N. Still, Jr., Why
the South Lost the Civil War (Athens: University of Georgia
Press, 1986), and Virgil Carrington Jones, Gray
Ghosts and Rebel Raiders (New York: Henry Holt, 1956), James
J. Williamson, Mosby's
Rangers (New York: Ralph B. Kenyon, 1896 [reprint 1982])
For
the war’s impact on civil and economic liberty, see Henry Clay Dean,
Crimes of the Civil War and Curse of the Funding System (Wiggins,
Miss.: Crown Rights Book Co., 1998 [1868]), Dean Sprague, Freedom
under Lincoln: Federal Power and Personal Liberty Under the Strain
of Civil War (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965), John A. Marshall,
American
Bastille: A History of the Illegal Arrests and Imprisonments During
the Late Civil War (Philadelphia: T. W. Hartley, 1875),
and Ekirch, The Decline of American Liberalism, chapters
8 and 9 (pp. 116-146).
Rise
of Total War
Total
warriors regard the enemy’s entire society as a legitimate target.
For the practice’s origins in the 1860s, consult John Bennett Walters,
"General William T. Sherman and Total War," Journal
of Southern History, 14, 4 (November 1948), pp. 447-480,
Lance Janda, "Shutting the Gates of Mercy: The American Origins
of Total War, 1860-1880," Journal
of Military History, 59, 1 (January 1995), pp. 7-26, Daniel
E. Sutherland, "Abraham Lincoln, John Pope, and the Origins
of Total War," Journal of Military History, 56, 4 (October
1992), pp. 567-586, and James M. McPherson, Drawn
With the Sword: Reflections on the American Civil War (New
York: Oxford University Press, 1996), chapter 5, "From Limited
to Total War," pp. 66-86. An interesting comparative symposium
on total war is Stig Förster and Jörg Nagler, On
the Road to Total War: The American Civil War and the German Wars
of Unification, 1861-1871 (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1997). See, as well, Russell F. Weigley, The
American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy
and Policy (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1977).
V.
Rounding Out the Continental Empire
Robert
Drinnon, Facing
West: The Metaphysics of Indian-Hating and Empire Building
(New York: New American Library, 1980) and Albert K. Weinberg,
Manifest
Destiny: A Study of Nationalist Expansion in American History
(Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1963) see 20th-century US
empire as a continuation of forcible 19th-century expansion
over land. The frontier theme is taken further by Lloyd E. Ambrosius,
"Turner’s Frontier Thesis and the Modern American Empire: A
Review Essay," Civil War History, XVII, 4 (December
1971), pp. 332-339, and Wilbur R. Jacobs, "National Frontiers,
Great World Frontiers, and the Shadow of Frederick Jackson Turner,"
International History Review, VII, 2 (May 1985), pp. 261-270.
Ernest N. Paolino, The
Foundations of the American Empire: William Henry Seward and U.S.
Foreign Policy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1973)
emphasizes the neo-mercantilist, economic side of things.
VI.
1898 and US Empire
William
Appleman Williams, The
Tragedy of American Diplomacy (New York: Dell, 1962), The
Roots of the Modern American
Empire (New York: Random House, 1969), and The
Contours of American History, Thomas McCormick, The China
Market: America’s Quest for Informal Empire, 1893-1901
(Chicago: Quadrangle, 1967), Lloyd C. Gardner, A Different Frontier:
Selected Readings in the Foundations of American Economic Expansion
(Chicago: Quadrangle, 1966), and Walter LaFeber, The
New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansion, 1860-1898
(Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967) and "The
World and the United States," American
Historical Review, 100, 4 (October 1995), pp. 1015-1033,
all view US imperialism as centering on neo-mercantilist economic
objectives.
The
birth of the US overseas empire is treated in Philip S. Foner,
The
Spanish-Cuban-American War and the Birth of American Imperialism,
1895-1898, 2 volumes (New York, Monthly Review Press, 1972),
Joseph R. Stromberg, "The Spanish-American War as Trial Run,
or Empire Its Own Justification," in Denson, ed., The
Costs of War, pp. 169-201, Walter Millis, The
Martial Spirit (Boston: Literary Guild of America, 1931),
and Walter Karp, The
Politics of War (New York: Harper and Row, 1979). Robert
L. Beisner, Twelve
against Empire: The Anti-Imperialists, 1898-1900 (New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1968) and William F. Marina, "Opponents of Empire:
An Interpretation of American Anti-Imperialism" (Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Denver, 1968) treat the opponents of US imperialism,
one of whom was William Graham Sumner; Sumner’s War
and Other Essays (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1914)
remains very useful.
Stuart
Creighton Miller, Benevolent
Assimilation: American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899-1903
(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982), Walter L. Williams,
"United States Indian Policy and the Debate over Philippine
Annexation: Implications for the Origins of American Imperialism,"
Journal of American History,
66, 4 (March 1980), pp. 810-831, and John W. Rollins, "The
Anti-Imperialists and Twentieth Century American Foreign Policy,"
Studies on the Left, III, 1 (1962), pp. 9-24, with comments
by Harold Baron (pp. 24-27) and Thomas J. McCormick (pp. 28-33),
deal with various aspects and outcomes of the 1898 war.
On
late 19th and early 20th-century European
and US imperialism, see such classic studies as John A. Hobson,
Imperialism:
A Study (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965 [1904]),
Scott Nearing, The Twilight of Empire (New York: Vanguard
Press, 1930), Scott Nearing and Joseph Freeman, Dollar Diplomacy:
A Study in American Imperialism (New York: Monthly Review Press,
1966 [1925]), and Parker Thomas Moon, Imperialism
and World Politics (New York: Macmillan, 1930).
VII.
World War I and US Intervention
Sidney
Fay, The
Origins of the World War, 2 volumes (New York: Macmillan,
1948 [1928]) and Harry Elmer Barnes, The
Genesis of the World War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1929)
and In
Quest of Truth and Justice: De-Bunking the War Guilt Myth
(Colorado Springs, Colorado: Ralph Myles, 1972 [1928]) deal with
the origins of the great disaster.
More
recent studies include L.F.C. Turner, Origins of the First World
War (New York: W.W. Norton, 1970), Joachim Remak, The
Origins of World War I, 1871-1914 (New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston, 1967), A. J. P. Taylor, A History of the First World
War (New York: Berkley Publishing, 1966), Arno Mayer, The
Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War (New
York: Pantheon, 1981), and James Joll, The
Origins of the First World War (New York: Longman, 1992).
Niall Ferguson, in The
Pity of War (New York: Basic Books, 1999), is especially
skeptical about British intervention in the continental conflict.
C.
Hartley Grattan, Why
We Fought (New York: Vanguard, 1929, reprint New York: Bobbs
Merrill, 1969), Walter Millis, The
Road to War, America 1914-1917 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin,
1935), Charles C. Tansill, America
Goes to War (Boston: Little, Brown, 1938), Walter Karp,
The
Politics of War (above), Ralph Raico "World War I:
The Turning Point" in Denson, ed., The
Costs of War, pp. 203-247, and the classic H.C. Engelbrecht
and F. C. Hanighen, Merchants
of Death: A Study of the International Armament Industry
(New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1934), examine why the United
States entered World War I. Tansill’s The
Purchase of the Danish West Indies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press, 1932) looks at a neglected case of a big power
intimidating a little power.
Carroll
Quigley’s The
Anglo-American Establishment (New York: Books in Focus,
1981) discusses US Anglophiles, while Robert Lansing’s War
Memoirs (Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1935) proves the point.
Paul Fussell, The
Great War and Modern Memory (New York: Oxford University
Press, 1975) and Modris Eksteins, Rites
of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age (New
York: Doubleday, 1989) explore literary and cultural sides of the
catastrophe. In Stephen Kern, The
Culture of Time and Space (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University
Press, 1983), discusses World War I as the first "cubist war"
(pp. 287-312). Finally, Arno Mayer, Wilson vs. Lenin: Political
Origins of the New Diplomacy, 1917-1918 (New York: Meridian
Books, 1964) and N. Gordon Levin, Woodrow
Wilson and World Politics: America’s Response to War and Revolution
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1968) show how ambitious US
leaders sought to deal – this early – with their potential communist
rivals for world power. For more on the ideological fallout of Wilson’s
policies, see Paul Gottfried, "Wilsonianism:
The Legacy That Won’t Die," Journal of Libertarian Studies,
IX, 2 (Fall 1990), pp. 117-126. For a study of clerical opinion,
see Richard M. Gamble, "War for Righteousness: The Progressive
Clergy and the Great War" (PhD Dissertation, University of
South Carolina, 1995).
Conditions
on the Home Front
For
Wilson’s reign of terror and the expansion of government during
the war, see H. C. Peterson and Gilbert C. Fite, Opponents
of War, 1917-1918 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press,
1957), Theodore Hornberger, "World War I and the Crisis of
American Liberty," American Quarterly, 16, 1 (Spring
1964), pp. 104-112, and Ronald Schaffer, America
in the Great War: The Rise of the War Welfare State (New
York: Oxford University Press, 1991). For the role of progressive-statist
intellectuals, see Randolph Bourne, War
and the Intellectuals: Collected Essays, 1915-1918, ed.
Carl Resek (New York: Harper & Row, 1964), Clarence Karier,
"Making the World Safe for Democracy: An Historical Critique
of John Dewey’s Pragmatic Liberal Philosophy in the Warfare State,"
Educational Theory, 27, 1 (Winter 1977), pp. 12-47, and
Murray
N. Rothbard, "World
War I as Fulfillment: Power and the Intellectuals," Journal
of Libertarian Studies, IX, 1 (Winter 1989), pp. 81-125, and
"War Collectivism in World War I" in Ronald Radosh and
Murray N. Rothbard, eds., A
New History of Leviathan (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1972),
pp. 66-110. For a caustic survey of the same topics, see H. L. Mencken,
The
Vintage Mencken (New York: Vintage Books, 1955), especially
"Star-Spangled Men" and "The Archangel Woodrow,"
pp. 106-120.
Further
Progress of Total War
Colin
Simpson, The
Lusitania (Boston: Little, Brown, 1972) and Ralph Raico,
"The
Politics of Hunger: A Review," Review of Austrian Economics,
3 (1989), pp. 253-259 deal with aspects of World War I as a total
war.
VIII.
Inter-War Years and The Fight Against Intervention, 1939-1941
Carl
P. Parrini, Heir
to Empire: United States Economic Diplomacy, 1916-1923 (Pittsburgh:
University of Pittsburgh Press, 1969), Emily S. Rosenberg, Spreading
the American Dream: American Economic and Cultural Expansion, 1890-1945
(New York: Hill & Wang, 1982), and Stanley Lebergott, "The
Returns to U.S. Imperialism, 1890-1929," Journal of Economic
History, XL, 2 (June 1980), pp. 229-252, are useful for the
interwar years. For essential background on the Middle East – soon
to become an important US interest – see David Fromkin, A
Peace to End All Peace: Creating the Modern Middle East, 1914-1922
(New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1989) and Harvey O’Connor,
The Empire of Oil (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1956).
Murray N. Rothbard, "The New Deal and the International Monetary
System" in Leonard P. Liggio and James J. Martin, eds., Watershed
of Empire: Essays on New Deal Foreign Policy (Colorado Springs:
Ralph Myles, 1976), pp. 19-64, and Robert Freeman Smith, "American
Foreign Relations, 1920-1942" in Barton J. Berstein, ed., Towards
a New Past: Dissenting Essays in American History (New York:
Vintage Books, 1969) are important for the interwar years, especially
the former.
William
Appleman Williams, "The Legend of Isolationism in the 1920s,"
pp. 104-159 of The Tragedy
of American Diplomacy, is essential reading. And see, on
one important anti-interventionist, Orde S. Pinckney, "William
E. Borah: Critic of American Foreign Policy," Studies on
the Left, I (1960), pp. 48-61. On the "isolationist"
movement, see Selig Adler, The
Isolationist Impulse: Its Twentieth-Century Reaction (New
York: Collier Books, 1961) (hostile) and Wayne Cole, America
First: The Battle against Intervention, 1940-1941 (Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press, 1953), Manfred Jonas, Isolationism
in America, 1935-1941 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University
Press, 1966), Justus Doenecke, "Power, Markets and Ideology:
The Isolationist Response to Roosevelt Policy, 1940-1941" in
Liggio and Martin, Watershed
of Empire, pp. 132-161 (much friendlier), and Manfred Jonas,
"Pro-Axis Sentiment and American Isolationism," The
Historian, 29 (February 1967), 221-237 (who finds very little
such sentiment).
Other
studies include Leonard P. Liggio, "Isolationism,
Old and New – Part I," Left and Right, II, 1 (Winter
1966), pp. 19-35, Michele Flynn Stenehjem, An
American First: John T. Flynn and the America First Committee
(New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House, 1976), A. Scott Berg, Lindbergh
(New York: G. P. Putnam’s, 1998), and In
Danger Undaunted: The Anti-Interventionist Movement of 1940-1941
as Revealed in the Papers of the America First Committee,
Justus Doenecke, ed. (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1990).
Contemporary
statements by "isolationists" include General Smedley
Butler, War
Is a Racket (Costa Mesa, California: Noontide Press, 1991
[1935]), Bruce Knight, How
to Run a War (New York: Arno Press, 1972 [1936]), Charles
A. Beard, Giddy Minds and Foreign Quarrels (New York: Macmillan,
1939) and A Foreign Policy for America (New York:
Alfred A. Knopf, 1940), Edwin M. Borchard and W. P. Lage, Neutrality
for the United States (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1940),
Porter Sargent, Getting Us Into War (Boston: Porter Sargent,
1941),
William
Henry Chamberlin, "War – Shortcut to Fascism," American
Mercury, LI, 204 (December 1940), pp. 391-400, Lawrence Dennis,
The
Dynamics of War and Revolution (New York: Weekly Foreign
Letter, 1940), and John T. Flynn, Country
Squire in the White House (New York: Doubleday, Doran &
Co., 1940).
Thomas
E. Mahl, Desperate
Deception: British Covert Operations in the United States, 1939-1944
(Washington: Brassey’s, 1998) deals with foreign agents of influence.
For ideological currents of the period, see James J. Martin, American
Liberalism and World Politics, 1931-1941, 2 volumes (New York:
Devin Adair, 1964) and Justin Raimondo, Reclaiming
the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement
(Burlingame, Ca.: Center for Libertarian Studies, 1993), pp.
11-148.
IX.
World War II: Causes and Consequences
General
works on World War II include Captain B. H. Liddell-Hart, History
of the Second World War (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1970)
and Esmonde M. Robertson, ed., The
Origins of the Second World War (New York: St. Martins,
1971), as well as such revisionist works as A.J.P. Taylor, The
Origins of the Second World War (New York: Premier Books
[Fawcett World Library], 1961[1965]), and Charles A. Beard, American
Foreign Policy in the Making, 1932-1940 (New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1946) and President
Roosevelt and the Coming of the War, 1941: A Study in Appearances
and Realities (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1948).
See also, William Appleman Williams, The
Tragedy of American Diplomacy, "The War for the American
Frontier," 160-200.
On
the origins of the Pacific War, see A. Whitney Griswold, The
Far Eastern Policy of the United States (New York: Harcourt,
Brace, 1938), Charles C. Tansill, Back Door to War: The
Roosevelt Foreign Policy, 1933-1941 (Chicago: Henry Regnery,
1952), Paul Schroeder, The
Axis Alliance and Japanese-American Relations, 1941 (Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press, 1958), William L. Neumann, America
Encounters Japan: From Perry to MacArthur (New York: Harper
& Row, 1963), Justus Doenecke, "The Debate Over Coercion:
The Dilemma of America’s Pacifists and the Manchurian Crisis,"
Peace and Change, II, 1 (Spring 1974), pp. 47-52, and Thomas
Breslin, "Mystifying the Past: Establishment Historians and
the Origins of the Pacific War," Bulletin of Concerned Asian
Scholars, 8, 4 (October-December 1976), pp. 18-36.
Pearl
Harbor Debate
The
growing literature on Pearl Harbor includes George Morgenstern,
Pearl
Harbor: The Story of the Secret War (New York: Devin Adair,
1947), Rear Admiral Robert A. Theobald, The
Final Secret of Pearl Harbor (New York: Devin Adair, 1954),
Husband Edward Kimmel, Admiral Kimmel's Story (Chicago: Regnery,
1955), Harry Elmer Barnes, Perpetual
War for Perpetual Peace Caldwell, Idaho: Caxton, 1953),
and "Pearl
Harbor After Half a Century," Left and Right, IV
(1968), pp. 9-132, reprinted as Pearl Harbor After Half a Century
(New York: Arno Press, 1972), Ronald Radosh, "Democracy
and the Formation of Foreign Policy: The Case of FDR and America’s
Entrance into World War II," Left and Right, III,
3 (Autumn 1967), pp. 31-38, Bruce R. Bartlett, Cover-Up:
The Politics of Pearl Harbor, 1941-1946 (New Rochelle, N.Y.:
Arlington House, 1978), John Toland, Infamy:
Pearl Harbor and Its Aftermath (Garden City, NY: Doubleday,
1982), James Rusbridger and Eric Nave, Betrayal
at Pearl Harbor: How Churchill Lured Roosevelt into World War II
(New York: Summit Books, 1991), Robert Smith Thompson, A
Time for War: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Path to Pearl Harbor
New York: Prentice Hall, 1991), and Robert B. Stinnett, Day
of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor (New York:
Free Press, 1999).
William
Henry Chamberlin, America's
Second Crusade (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1950), George N.
Crocker, Roosevelt’s
Road to Russia (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1959), and William
L. Neumann, "Roosevelt’s Foreign Policy Decisions, 1940-1945,"
Modern Age (Summer 1975), pp. 272-284, are critical assessments
of US participation in the war. For arguments that US entry was
unnecessary, see Bruce M. Russett, No
Clear and Present Danger: A Skeptical View of the United States'
Entry into World War II (New York: Harper & Row, 1972)
and Patrick J. Buchanan, A
Republic Not an Empire: Reclaiming America’s Destiny (Washington,
DC: Regnery, 1999), pp. 231-298.
John
T. Flynn, As
We Go Marching (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1944) and
The
Roosevelt Myth (San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes, 1998 [1948]),
Dwight MacDonald, Memoirs of a Revolutionist (New York: Meridian
Books, 1958), Richard Drinnon, Keeper
of Concentration Camps: Dillon S. Myer and American Racism
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987), and Thomas J.
Fleming, The
New Dealers’ War: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the War Within the War
(New York: Basic Books, 2001), treat some domestic consequences
of the war. For a collection of Flynn’s antiwar (and other) essays,
see Gregory P. Pavlik, Forgotten
Lessons: Selected Essays of John T. Flynn (Irvington-on-Hudson,
NY: Foundation for Economic Education, 1996).
For
displacement of the British empire by the US, see Gabriel Kolko,
The
World and United States Foreign Policy, 1943-1945 (New York:
Vintage Books, 1968), John Charmley, Churchill’s
Grand Alliance: The Anglo-American Special Relationship, 1940-1957
(New York: Harcourt Brace, 1995), and Ralph Raico, "Rethinking
Churchill" in Denson, ed., The
Costs of War, pp. 321-360
Total
War and World War II
For
World War II as a high point of total war – in theory and practice
– see F.J.P. Veale, Advance
to Barbarism: The Development of Total Warfare from Sarajevo to
Hiroshima (Appleton, Wisconsin: C. C. Nelson Publishing
Co., 1953), Capt. Russell Grenfell, Unconditional
Hatred: German War Guilt and the Future of Europe (New York:
Devin Adair, 1958), David Irving, The
Destruction of Dresden (New York: Ballantine Books, 1965),
William L. Neumann, "Hiroshima
Reconsidered," Left and Right, II, 2 (Spring 1966),
pp. 33-38, James J. Martin, Revisionist
Viewpoints: Essays in a Dissident Historical Tradition (Colorado
Springs: Ralph Myles, 1971), "The Bombing and Negotiated Peace
Questions – in 1944," pp. 71-124, Barton J. Bernstein, "Hiroshima
Reconsidered – Thirty Years Later," Foreign Service Journal
(August 1975), pp. 8-34, and "Wrong Numbers," The Independent
Monthly (July 1995), pp. 41-44, and Martin J. Sherwin, A
World Destroyed: Hiroshima and the Origins of the Arms Race
(New York: Vintage Books, 1987). Elbridge Colby, "Aerial Law
and War Targets," American Journal of International Law,
19, 4 (October 1925), pp. 702-715, gives a rationale for future
Anglo-American bombing practices before the fact.
US
Wartime Planning Foretells the Cold War Order
How
US imperial wartime planning presaged the Cold War is explained
in William Appleman Williams, "The Large Corporation and American
Foreign Policy," in David Horowitz, ed., Corporations
and the Cold War (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969),
71-104, and, in the same volume, Lloyd C. Gardner, "The New
Deal, New Frontiers, and the Cold War: A Re-examination of American
Expansion, 1933-1945," pp. 105-141, and David W. Eakins, "Business
Planners and America’s Postwar Expansion," pp. 143-171; these
essays complement those in Liggio and Martin, Watershed
of Empire cited above.
See,
as well, Lloyd C. Gardner, Economic
Aspects of New Deal Diplomacy (Madison: University of Wisconsin
Press, 1964), James J. Martin, "‘Defense’ Origins of the New
Imperialism,’" in Revisionist
Viewpoints, pp. 1-27, Noam Chomsky, "Intervention in
Vietnam and Central America: Parallels and Differences," Monthly
Review, 37, 4 (September 1985), pp. 1-29, and Melvin Leffler,
"The American Conception of National Security and the Beginnings
of the Cold War, 1945-1948," American Historical Review,
89, 2 (April 1984), pp. 346-381. See as well Clyde Wilson, "Global
Democracy and American Tradition," Intercollegiate Review,
24, 1 (Fall 1988), pp. 3-14.
X.
The Cold War As a System of Power and the American Empire
Cold
War histories include Kenneth Ingram, The Cold War (London:
Darwen Finlayson, 1955), mildly revisionist, Hugh Thomas, Armed
Truce: The Beginnings of the Cold War, 1945-1946 (New York:
Atheneum, 1987), fairly conventional, D.F. Fleming, The
Cold War and Its Origins, 2 volumes (Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, 1961), revisionist, John Lukacs, A
New History of the Cold War (Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books,
1966), somewhat critical, and Louis J. Halle, The
Cold War as History (New York: Harper & Row, 1967),
fairly conventional, and Stephen E. Ambrose, Rise
to Globalism: American Foreign Policy Since 1938-1976 (New
York: Penguin Books, 1976), somewhat critical.
Thomas
G. Paterson, ed., Cold
War Critics: Alternatives to American Foreign Policy in the Truman
Years (Chicago: Quadrangle, 1971), including Henry W. Berger,
"Senator Robert Taft Dissents from Military Escalation,"
pp. 167-204, and Ronald Radosh and Leonard P. Liggio, "Henry
A. Wallace and the Open Door," pp. 76-113, David Horowitz,
The
Free World Colossus: A Critique of American Foreign Policy in the
Cold War (New York: Hill & Wang, 1971), Gabriel and
Joyce Kolko, The
Limits of Power: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1945-1954
(New York: Harper & Row, 1972), Richard J. Walton, Cold
War and Counterrevolution: The Foreign Policy of John F. Kennedy
(Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1973), Thomas G. Paterson, ed., The
Origins of the Cold War (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath &
Co., 1974), Charles Mee, Meeting
at Potsdam (New York: M. Evans, 1975), and Walter LaFeber,
American,
Russia, and the Cold War, 1945-1975 (New York: John Wiley
& Sons, 1976), are all revisionist works.
For
a study stressing close neo-mercantilist cooperation of government
and business in shaping US foreign policy, see Gabriel Kolko, The
Roots of American Foreign Policy (Boston: Beacon Press,
1969). And compare William Appleman Williams, Empire
as a Way of Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980),
and the relevant sections of Contours
of American History and The
Tragedy of American Diplomacy. For the men who conducted
policy, see Lloyd Gardner, Architects
of Illusion: Men and Ideas in American Foreign Policy, 1941-1949
(Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970) and Walter Isaacson and Evan Thomas,
The
Wise Men (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986).
The
Right-wing "Isolationist" Critique of the Cold War
It
is insufficiently appreciated that a "right-wing" critique
of the Cold War existed, especially in its early years. Works of
such critics include Felix Morley, "Judges in Our Own Cause,"
Vital Speeches of the Day, X, 16 (June 1, 1944), pp. 499-502,
"Conservatism and Foreign Policy," ibid., XXI,
7 (January 15, 1955), pp. 974-979, and "American Republic or
American Empire," Modern Age, I, 1 (Summer 1957), pp.
20-32, Robert Taft, A Foreign Policy for Americans (Garden
City, NY: Doubleday, 1951), F. A. Harper, "In Search of Peace"
(Menlo Park, California: Institute for Humane Studies, Reprint #1,
1970 [1951]), Louis Bromfield, A New Pattern for a Tired World
(London: Cassell & Company, 1954), Garet Garrett, The
People's Pottage (Reprinted 2004 by Caxton Press with an
introduction by Bruce Ramsey) Boston: Western Islands, 1965), and
Frank Chodorov, Out of Step: The Autobiography of an Individualist
(New York: Devin-Adair, 1962), especially the chapter on "Isolationism,"
pp. 113-123.
Libertarian
Old Right critics of the Cold War are treated in Henry W. Berger,
"A Conservative Critique of Containment: Senator Taft on the
Early Cold War Program" in David Horowitz, ed., Containment
and Revolution (Boston: Beacon Press, 1967), pp. 125-139, Ronald
Radosh, Prophets
on the Right: Profiles of Conservative Critics of American Globalism
(New York: Simon & Schuster, 1975), Joseph R. Stromberg, "Felix
Morley: An Old-Fashioned Republic Critic of Statism and Interventionism,"
Journal of Libertarian Studies, 2, 3 (Fall 1978), 269-277,
and Leonard P. Liggio, "Felix Morley and the Commonwealthman
Tradition: The Country-Party, Centralization and the American Empire,"
ibid., 279-286, and Justus D. Doenecke, Not
to the Swift: The Old Isolationists in the Cold War Era
(Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1979.
Other
Cold War criticisms are found in Murray N. Rothbard, "Myths
of the Cold War," Rampart Journal of Individualist Thought,
2, 2 (Summer 1966), 65-76, Leonard P. Liggio, "Why the Futile
Crusade?" (New York: Center for Libertarian Studies, Occasional
Paper #6, April 1978), and Robert Griffith, "The Old Progressives
and the Cold War," Journal of American History, 66,
2 (September 1979), pp. 334-347. See also Murray N. Rothbard, "Harry
Elmer Barnes as Revisionist of the Cold War," in Arthur Goddard,
ed., Harry
Elmer Barnes, Learned Crusader: The New History in Action
(Colorado Springs: Ralph Myles, 1968), pp. 314-342.
Military,
Industrial, University Complex
The
new order of permanent mobilization is discussed in Fred J. Cook,
The Warfare State (New York: Macmillan, 1962), Seymour Melman,
Our Depleted Society (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston,
1965), Pentagon
Capitalism: The Political Economy of War (New York: McGraw
Hill, 1970), and The
Permanent War Economy: American Capitalism in Decline New
York: Simon & Schuster, 1974), Richard F. Kaufman, The
War Profiteers (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1972), A. Ernest
Fitzgerald, The
High Priests of Waste (New York: W. W. Norton, 1972), Sidney
Lens, The
Military-Industrial Complex (Philadelphia: Pilgrim Press,
1972), and Robert Higgs, ed., Arms,
Politics, and the Economy (New York: Holmes & Meier,
1990).
On
the defense intellectuals, see Leonard P. Liggio, "American
Foreign Policy and National-Security Management," in Rothbard
and Radosh, A
New History of Leviathan, pp. 224-259, Christopher Lasch,
The Agony of the American Left (New York: Vintage Books,
1968), chapter three, "The Cultural Cold War: A Short History
of the Congress for Cultural Feedom," pp. 63-114, and Robin
W. Winks, Cloak
and Gown: Scholars in the Secret War, 1939-1961 (New York:
Morrow, 1987).
The
war-in-peace theme is prefigured in Harold Lasswell, Essays
on the Garrison State (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books,
1997 [reprint]) and taken further in Vernon K. Dibble, "The
Garrison Society" in Frank Lindenfeld, ed., Radical
Perspectives on Social Problems (New York: Macmillan, 1973),
305-315. Also very useful, generally, is Edward Mead Earle, ed.,
Makers
of Modern Strategy: Military Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971).
On
the relations between reformist intellectuals and the state apparatus,
see George B. de Huszar, ed., The Intellectuals (Glencoe,
Ill.: The Free Press, 1960), Murray N. Rothbard, "The Great
Society: A Libertarian Critique," in Marvin E. Gettleman and
David Mermelstein, eds., The Great Society Reader: The Failure
of American Liberalism (New York: Random House, 1967), pp. 502-511,
Robert J. Bresler, "The Ideology the Executive State: Legacy
of Liberal Internationalism" in Liggio and Martin, eds., Watershed
of Empire, pp. 1-18, Arthur A. Ekirch Jr., A, "The
Reform Mentality, War, Peace, and the National State: From the Progressives
to Vietnam," Journal of Libertarian Studies, 3,
1 (1979), 55-72, and Bernard Semmel, Imperialism
and Social Reform: English Social-Imperial Thought, 1895-1914
(Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1968).
Constitutional
Issues
J
Allen Smith, The
Growth and Decadence of Constitutional Government (New York:
Henry Holt & Co., 1930), Edward S. Corwin, The
Constitution and Total War (Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries,
1970 [1947]), Merlo J. Pusey, The Way We Go To War (Boston:
Houghton Mifflin, 1969), and Raoul Berger, Executive
Privilege: A Constitutional Myth (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press, 1974) address some constitutional questions arising
in an age of empire.
The
"Peace Movement"
Lawrence
Wittner, Rebels
Against War: The American Peace Movement, 1941-1960 (New
York: Columbia University Press, 1969) and Charles Chatfield, Jr.,
For
Peace and Justice: Pacifism in America,
1914-1941 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1971).
Case
Studies of the Empire’s Client States
The
effects of empire on its beneficiaries are treated in Richard J.
Barnet, Intervention
and Revolution: The United States in the Third World (New
York: New American Library, 1968), and – out of a vast literature
– Constantine Tsoucalas, The
Greek Tragedy (Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1969), Robert Freeman
Smith, The
United States and Cuba: Business and Diplomacy, 1917-1960
(New Haven, Conn.: College
& University Press, 1960), Walter LaFeber, Inevitable
Revolutions: The United States and Central America (New
York: W. W. Norton, 1984), Stanley Karnow, In
Our Image: America’s Empire in the Philippines (New York:
Random House, 1989), H. W. Brands, Bound
to Empire: The United States and the Philippines (New York:
Oxford University Press, 1992), Fred Halliday, Iran,
Dictatorship and Development (New York: Penguin,
1979), and Gary Sick, All
Fall down: America’s Tragic Encounter With Iran (New York:
Penguin, 1986).
Total
War, Nuclear and Cosmic
Nuclear
and other questions are dealt with in C. Wright Mills, The
Causes of World War III (New York: Simon & Schuster,
1958), Gar Alperovitz, Cold War Essays (Cambridge, Mass.:
Schenkman Publishing Co., 1970) and Atomic
Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam (New York: Viking Penguin,
1985), George Kennan, The
Nuclear Delusion: Soviet-American Relations in the Atomic Age
(New York: Pantheon, 1983), E.P. Thompson, The
Heavy Dancers: Writings on War, Past and Future (New York:
Pantheon Books, 1985), Avner Cohen and Steven Lee, eds., Nuclear
Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Fundamental Questions
(Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1986), Charles R. Morris, Iron
Destinies, Lost Opportunities: The Arms Race between the U.S.A.
and the U.S.S.R., 1945-1987 (New York: Harper & Row,
1988),and John Mueller, "The Essential Irrelevance of Nuclear
Weapons," International Security, 13, 2 (Fall 1988),
pp. 55-79, and Retreat
from Doomday: The
Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989).
For a chilling restatement of total war principles, see William
S. Lind, Col. Keith Nightengale, Capt. John F. Schmidt, Col. Joseph
W. Sutton, and Lt. Col. Gary I. Wilson, "The
Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation," Marine
Corps Gazette (October 1989), pp. 22-26.
XI.
Korean War
On
the Korean War, Joseph C. Goulden, Korea:
The Untold Story of the War (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982)
is a useful, conventional account. I.F. Stone, The
Hidden History of the Korean War (New York: Monthly Review
Press, 1969 [1952]) is a radically revisionist critique. Helen Mears,
"A Note on Atrocities," Dissent, I, 1 (Winter 1954),
pp. 103-106, looks at civilian casualties. Col. David H. Hackworth
and Julie Sherman, About
Face (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1989) gives a soldier’s
view of America’s Asian wars.
XII.
Vietnam War and After
Critical
accounts include Robert Scheer, How the United States Got Involved
in Vietnam (Santa Barbara, California: Center for the Study
of Democratic Institutions, 1965), Marvin E. Gettleman, ed., Vietnam:
History, Documents, and Opinions on a Major World Crisis (Greenwood,
Con.: Fawcett, 1965), Hackworth and Sherman, About
Face, Jean Lacoutre, Vietnam: Between Two Truces
(New York: Random House, 1966), Robert Shapleen, The Lost Revolution:
The U.S. in Vietnam, 1946-1966 (New York: Harper & Row,
1966) and Time
out of Hand: Revolution and Reaction in Southeast Asia (New
York: Harper & Row, 1969), Carl Oglesby and Richard Shaull,
Containment and Change (London: Macmillan, 1967), Seymour
M. Hersh, My
Lai 4: A Report on the Massacre and Its Aftermath (New York:
Vintage Books, 1970),
Noam Chomsky, American
Power and the New Mandarins (New York: Vintage Books, 1969),
At
War With Asia (New York: Pantheon, 1970), and For
Reasons of State (New York: Vintage Books, 1973), Gabriel
Kolko, Anatomy
of a War (New York: Pantheon, 1985), and Neil Sheehan, A
Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam
(New York: Random House, 1988)
Follow
the trail of US imperialism through the 1970s and into the 1980s,
one can consult Noam Chomsky, Towards
A New Cold War: Essays on the Current Crisis and How We Got Here
(New York: Pantheon, 1982) Holly Sklar, ed., Trilateralism:
The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management
(Boston: South End Press, 1980), Robert Scheer, With
Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush, and Nuclear War (New York:
Vintage Books, 1983) Jonathan Kwitney, Endless
Enemies: The Making of an Unfriendly World (New York: Congdon
and Weed, 1984), Frances Moore Lappé, Rachel Schurman, and
Kevin Danaher, Betraying the National Interest: How U.S. Foreign
Aid Threatens Global Security by Undermining the Political and Economic
Stability of the Third World (New York: Grove Press, 1987),and
Holly Sklar, Reagan,
Trilateralism, and the Neoliberals: Containment and Intervention
in the 1980s (Boston: South End Press, 1986). Murray N.
Rothbard, Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy
(Burlingame, California: Rothbard-Rockwell Report, 1995), dealing
with the late 1970s and early 1980s, is especially useful for its
analysis of economic interests in foreign policy.
XIII.
Soviet Collapse and Renewed Debate
The
collapse of the Soviet Union briefly opened up debate on US foreign
policy. Among those calling for a more modest or even non-interventionist
world role for the US were Earl C. Ravenal, "The Case for Adjustment,
Foreign Policy,
81 (Winter 1990-1991), pp. 3-19, Ted Galen Carpenter, "The
New World Disorder," ibid., 84 (Fall 1991), pp. 24-39,
Doug Bandow, "Avoiding War," ibid., 89 (Winter
1992-1993), pp. 156-176, Christopher Layne and Benjamin Schwarz,
"American Hegemony – Without an Enemy," ibid.,
92 (Fall 1993), pp. 5-23, and Doug Bandow, "Keep the Troops
at Home: American Nonintervention," Current, 364 (July-August
1994), pp. 26-32. And see, as well, Eric A. Nordlinger, Isolationism
Reconfigured: American Foreign Policy for a New Century
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).
XIV.
Gulf War
On
the Gulf War, Rick Atkinson, Crusade:
The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War (Boston: Houghton
Mifflin, 1993) is a useful but conventional military history, while
Ramsey Clark, Fire
This Time: US War Crimes in the Gulf (New York: Thunder's
Mouth Press, 1994) focuses on other matters. [More will be added
here.]
XV.
Serbian War
See
Justin Raimondo, Into
the Bosnian Quagmire: The Case Against U.S. Intervention in the
Balkans (Burlingame, Ca.: America First Political Action
Committee, 1996) and Christopher Layne and Benjamin Schwarz, "Dubious
Anniversary: Kosovo One Year Later," Policy Analysis,
373 (Cato Institute, June 10, 2000). [More will be added here.]
XVI.
War and Generic Statism: The Warfare State against Civil Society
Various
theoretical views on the state are found in Franz Oppenheimer, The
State (New York: Free Life Editions, 1975), Murray N. Rothbard,
"The Anatomy of the State," in Egalitarianism
as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays (Auburn, Alabama:
Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2000), 55-88, and "War, Peace and
the State," 115-132, Karl Wittfogel, Oriental
Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power (New Haven,
Conn.: Yale University Press, 1957), Bertrand de Jouvenel, On
Power: Its Nature and the History of Its Growth (Indianapolis:
Liberty Fund, 1993 [1948]), C. Wright Mills, The
Power Elite (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956), and
Robert
L. Carneiro, "A Theory of the Origin of the State," in
Kenneth S. Templeton, Jr., ed., The
Politicization of Society (Indianapolis: Liberty Press,
1979), pp. 27-51. In the same volume (Templeton), see also Felix
Morley, "State and Society," pp. 53-82, Robert A. Nisbet,
"The New Despotism," pp. 167-207, and John A. Lukacs,
"The Monstrosity of Government," pp. 391-408.
Interesting
early discussions of the issued raised in the above works are found
in Destutt de Tracy, A Treatise on Political Economy (New
York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1970 [1817]) and John Taylor of Caroline,
Tyranny
Unmasked (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1992 [1822]).
For
the extension of a state’s power outside its boundaries – imperialism
– consult Hobson, Imperialism,
already mentioned, Joseph A. Schumpeter, Imperialism,
Social Classes: Two Essays (New York: Meridian Books, 1955),
William F. Marina, "Egalitarianism and Empire" in Templeton,
Politicization
of Society, 127-165, Paul Kennedy, The
Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military
Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House, 1987),
E.M. Winslow, "Marxian, Liberal, and Sociological Theories
of Imperialism," Journal of Political Economy, 39, 6
(December 1931), pp. 713-758, and The Pattern of Empire (New
York: Columbia University Press, 1948), and Norman Etherington,
Theories
of Imperialism: War, Conquest, and Capital (London: Croom
Helm, 1984). Still useful is Eugene Staley, War and the Private
Investor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935).
An
important addition to the literature is Murray N. Rothbard, "The
Origins of the Federal Reserve," Quarterly Journal of
Austrian Economics, 2, 3 (Fall 1999), pp. 3-51, which analyzes
the connections between central banking and monetary (and other)
forms of imperialism. Of a quite different character is Erik von
Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism
Revisited: From de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot (Washington,
DC: Regnery Gateway, 1990), which is unclassifiable, but abounds
with insights into the various topics treated in this listing.
For
domestic corporatism (alliance of business and state), see Robert
A. Brady, Business
as a System of Power (New York: Columbia University Press,
1943), Paul Baran, The
Political Economy of Growth (New York: Monthly Review Press,
1957), a Marxist view, Thomas J. McCormick, "Drift or Mastery?
A Corporatist Synthesis for American Diplomatic History," Reviews
in American History, 10, 4 (December 1982), pp. 318-330, Michael
J. Hogan, "Corporatism," Journal
of American History, 77, 1 (June 1990), pp. 153-160, and
Hans-Hermann Hoppe, "Marxist
and Austrian Class Analysis," Journal of Libertarian
Studies, IX, 2 (Fall 1990), pp. 80-93, and "Banking,
Nation States and International Politics: A Sociological Reconstruction
of the Present Economic Order," Review of Austrian Economics,
4 (1990), pp. 55-87.
For
more on the interplay of state power, economic interest, and war,
consult Ludwig von Mises, Nation,
State, and Economy (New York: New York University Press,
1983 [1919]) and Omnipotent
Government (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1944), John
U. Nef, War
and Human Progress (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University
Press, 1950), Frederic C. Lane, "Economic Consequences of Organized
Violence," Journal of Economic History, XVIII, 4 (December
1958), pp. 401-417, William Hardy McNeill, The
Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society Since 1000
A.D. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), Charles
Tilly, "War Making and State Making as Organized Crime"
in Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds.,
Bringing
the State Back In (New York: Cambridge University Press,
1985), pp. 169-191, Higgs, Crisis
and Leviathan, mentioned above, Anthony Giddens, The
Nation-State and Violence (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987), and
Hans-Hermann Hoppe, "Time
Preference, Government, and the Process of De-Civilization: From
Monarchy to Democracy" in Denson, ed., The
Costs of War, pp. 455-493, and Democracy:
The God That Failed (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books,
2001). For the inherent expansionism built into states, see Jörg
Guido Hülsmann, "Political
Unification: A Generalized Progression Theorem," Journal
of Libertarian Studies, 13, 1 (Summer 1997), pp. 81-96.
On
the central role of war in the expansion of state power, see Richard
Barnett, Roots of War: The Men and Institutions Behind
U.S. Foreign Policy (Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1973), John Brewer,
The
Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688-1783
(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1989), Bruce Porter, War
and the Rise of the State: The Military Foundations of Modern Politics
(New York: The Free Press, 1994), and Martin Van Creveld, The
Rise and Decline of the State (New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1999). On militarism, see Alfred Vagts, A
History of Militarism (Meridian Books, 1959 [1937]) and
Tristram Coffin, The Armed Society: Militarism in Modern America
(Baltimore: Penguin, 1964); and on war generally, John Keegan,
The
Face of Battle (New York: Viking Press, 1976).
The
essays in John V. Denson, ed., Reassessing
the Presidency: The Rise of the Executive State and the Decline
of Freedom (Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute,
2001) treat critically – for the entire span of US history – the
political institution which became the main bulwark of the rising
empire. It is the first scholarly collection to treat the office
of president as a standing menace to the peace, freedom, and prosperity
of the American people.
XVII.
Propaganda and Opinion-Management
Control
and manipulation of public opinion is a crucial lever for those
who wish to launch wars. The following are useful on this subject:
Stuart Chase, The
Tyranny of Words (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World,
1966 [1938]), especially chapter 18, "Stroll With the Statesmen,"
pp. 328-349, Harold D. Lasswell, Propaganda Techniques in the
World War (New York: Peter Smith, 1938), H.C. Peterson, Propaganda
for War: The Campaign Against American Neutrality, 1914-1917
(Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1939), William
L. Neumann, "How to Merchandise Foreign Policy: from ERAP to
MAP," American Perspective, 3 (1949), 183-193, 235-250,
Harold M. Hyman, To
Try Men’s Souls: Loyalty Tests in American History (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1959), Merle Curti, The
Roots of American Loyalty (New York: Atheneum, 1968), Phillip
Knightley, The
First Casualty: From the Crimea to Viet Nam (New York: Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich, 1975), Benjamin Ginsberg, The
Captive Public: How Mass Opinion Promotes State Power (New
York: Basic Books, 1986), Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing
Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (New York:
Pantheon, 1988), and Mahl, Desperate
Deception (already listed). And see also, Harry Elmer Barnes,
"Revisionism: A Key to Peace," Rampart Journal of Individualist
Thought, 2, 1 (Spring 1966), 8-74, reprinted with other pieces
in Revisionism:
A Key to Peace and Other Essays (San Francisco: Cato Institute,
1980) and Walter Karp, Indispensable
Enemies: The Politics of Misrule in America (Baltimore:
Penguin Books, 1973)
XVIII.
Unconventional Warfare and Alternate Models of Defense
Attempts
to break out of the imperialist world order have fostered irregular
forms of warfare. On this see Lin Piao, Long Live the Victory
of People’s War! (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1965), Vô
Nguyen Giap, People’s
War, People's Army (New York: Bantam Books, 1962), Michael
Collins, The
Path to Freedom (Boulder: Roberts Rinehart, 1996), Ernesto
Che Guevara, Guerrilla
Warfare (New York: Vinatage Books, 1968), Deneys Reitz,
Commando:
A Boer Journal of the Boer War (London: Faber & Faber,
1975 [1929]), John Ellis, A
Short History of Guerrilla Warfare (London: Ian Allan, 1975),
Robert B. Asprey, War
in the Shadows: The Guerrilla in History (Garden City, NY:
Doubleday, 1975), and
Joseph P. Kutger, "Irregular Warfare in Transition," Military
Affairs, 24, 3 (Autumn 1960), pp. 113-123.
For
libertarian perspectives, see William F. Marina, "Weapons,
Technology, and Legitimacy," in Morgan Norval, ed., The
Militia in 20th Century America (Falls Church, Va.:
Gun Owners Association, 1985), pp. 185-226, Murray N. Rothbard,
"Society Without a State," Nomos, 19 (1978), 191-207,
and Hans-Hermann Hoppe, "The Private Production of Defense"
(Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, Essays in Political Economy,
n.d.) and Democracy:
The God That Failed, Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, "National
Goods Versus Public Goods: Defense, Disarmament, and Free Riders,"
Review of Austrian Economics, 4 (1990), 88-122. For a pacifist
view, consult Gene Sharp, The
Politics of Nonviolent Action: The Methods of Nonviolent Action
(Boston: Extending Horizons Books, 1973).
For
guerrilla warfare in US history, see Marina, "Militia, Standing
Armies and the Second Amendment" and "Revolution and Social
Change: The American Revolution As a People’s War," Kerby,
"Why the Confederacy Lost," Jones, Gray
Ghosts and Rebel Raiders, and Williamson, Mosby's
Rangers, cited in previous sections.
XIX.
Just War Theory
For modern
restatements of Just War theory, see Robert M. Palter, "The
Ethics of Extermination," Ethics, 74, 3 (April 1964),
pp. 208-218, José A. Fernández, "Erasmus on the
Just War," Journal of the History of Ideas, 34,2 (April-June
1973, pp. 209-226, and C. A. J. Coady, "Deterrent Intentions
Revisited," Ethics, 99, 1 (October 1988), pp. 98-108.
For an argument that traditional Just War theory is too permissive,
consult Laurie Calhoun, "Just War? Moral Soldiers?", Independent
Review, IV, 3 (Winter 2000), pp. 325-345. See also, Thomas Nagel,
"War and Massacre," Philosophy and Public Affairs
1, 2 (Winter 1972), pp. 123-144.
XX.
Other Bibliographies
Bibliographies
consulted include Harry Elmer Barnes, Select Bibliography of
Revisionist Books Dealing with The Two World Wars and Their Aftermath
(Oxnard, Ca.: Oxnard Press Courier, n.d.), and Justus D. Doenecke,
"Isolationists of the 1930s and 1940s: An Historiographical
Essay," West Georgia College Studies in the Social Sciences,
13 (June 1974), 5-39, and The Literature of Isolationism: A Guide
to Non-Interventionist Scholarship, 1930-1972 (Colorado Springs:
Ralph Myles, 1972). I have also benefited from Ralph Raico, "A
Brief Annotated Bibliography of Revisionist Works" (unpublished).
XXI.
Websites
-
http://www.lewrockwell.com
-
http://www.antiwar.com
-
http://www.emperors-clothes.com
-
http://www.antibombing.com
-
http://www.polyconomics.com
Book reviews
on war, from various viewpoints, can be found at http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/reviewsw.htm
XXII.
The Debate Over US Empire in the Age of Bush II
The
opportunity provided US rulers by the criminal attacks of 9/11/01
has led to an outpouring of new works on the theme of American
empire. On the pro-imperial side of the ledger stand those who
see the US Empire as a benign, essential upholder of world order
on the model of the Athenian, Roman, or British empires. In general,
the British example is the one most on offer, for obvious cultural-linguistic
reasons.
That
so many pro-imperial writers now use the actual E-word is a sign
that they think they have won and that there really is no debate
needed. On the other hand, the new state of affairs may be an
improvement on earlier discussions taking the form of "first
there is an empire, then there is no empire, then there is."
Pride
of place in pushing the shining example of the British Empire
goes, naturally to our cousins across the water. Foremost among
these is Niall Ferguson, whose book, Empire:
The Rise and Decline of the British World Order and the Lessons
for Global Power (New York: Basic Books, 2003), draws
the expected lessons.
Paul
Johnson, "From
the Evil Empire to the Empire for Liberty," The New
Criterion, 21, 10 (June 2003), meditates on sovereignty and
is glad it slipped from the hands of the Papacy and ended up where
it belongs, with the British, and then the American state.
Stanley
Kurtz, "Democratic
Imperialism: A Blueprint," Policy Review, 118
(April 2003), exhorts Americans to look to the "liberal imperialism"
developed at the India Office by such worthies as John Stuart
Mill. (For a negative view of liberal imperialism, see Joseph
R. Stromberg, "Kantians
With Cruise Missiles," Antiwar.com, December 23, 2003,
and "John
Stuart Mill and Liberal Imperialism," Antiwar.com, May
18, 2002.)
Finally,
for reason in the service of madness, nothing beats the many books
and essays, widely available and too numerous to cite, by Victor
Davis Hanson of National
Review.
Given
the sheer size of the Liberal and Conservative – and now Neo-Conservative
– interventionist scholarly infrastructure that grew up during
the long constitutional and intellectual coma known as the Cold
War, there is far too much pro-imperial and "benign hegemonist"
literature to discuss here. For a useful overview of the imperial
"socialists of the chair," see the Right
Web a site that is perhaps unique in being able to tell libertarians
and paleoconservatives from the now largely Neo-Colonized Right
Wing.
Poised
somewhere between the paladins of empire and the critics of empire,
is Michael Ignatieff, "The
American Empire: The Burden," New York Times Magazine,
January 5. 2003.
We
now turn to the critics of the current phase of empire building.
Gore
Vidal, Dreaming
War (New York: Nation Books, 2003), and Norman Mailer,
Why
Are We At War? (New York: Random House, 2003), carry forth
a long-running critique of the imperial process.
Michael
Mann, Incoherent
Empire (London: Verso, 2003), is a tour de force by an
Anglo-American sociologist who has long been interested in forms
of power in human history. Here he argues that various ideological
and structural faults will make the run of the US Empire rather
briefer than its advocates think.
Chalmers
Johnson, The
Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic
(New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2004), is an important critique
by a long-established authority on East Asia. See also Johnson’s
earlier book, Blowback:
The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (New York:
Henry Holt & Co., 2000).
Claes
Ryn, America
the Virtuous: The Crisis of Democracy and the Quest for Empire
(New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2003) sees the
US imperial thrust as arising from ideological deformations of
American democracy traceable to Rousseau. A shorter version of
the thesis is found in Claes Ryn, "The
Ideology of American Empire," Orbis, (Summer 2003).
In
American
Empire: Realities
and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 2002), Andrew Bacevich rediscovers the wisdom
in the historical vision of Charles Beard and William Appleman
Williams. Bacevich’s doubts about empire may be traced through
a series of essays in First Things appearing from about
1995 onwards. In addition, The
Imperial Tense: Prospects and Problems of American Empire
(Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2003), a collection edited by Bacevich,
brings together a range of writings on the US Empire from
those of empire-deniers and empire defenders to those of mild
and harsh critics of the empire.
Written
before the recent excitement, Isabelle Grunberg, "Exploring
the ‘myth’ of hegemonic stability," International Organization,
44, 4 (Autumn 1990), pp. 431477, usefully debunks, as a
form of myth, the claim that a benevolent empire is necessary
to an orderly world. Another pre-9/11 piece, Jeffry A. Frieden,
"International Investment and Colonial Control: A New Interpretation,"
International Organization, 48, 4 (Autumn 1994), pp. 559593,
suggests that under certain circumstances a metropolitan power
will intervene to secure control of physically immoveable resources
important to that
|