Time to rescue BBC English
Last month at the British Library, as part of the admirable
series of poetry evenings organised by Josephine Hart, Edward Fox
and Dame Eileen Atkins presented a reading of ‘Four Quartets’. It is
not eccentric to declare Eliot’s long poem, composed between 1935
and 1942, as the greatest written in English since the death of
Tennyson, and it is certainly the greatest English poem of the last
century, conjoining, as it does, the language, landscape and history
of this country. Fox and Atkins, sensitive to its music and grave
beauty, gave a memorably lustrous performance.
Afterwards, however, the gratitude that one felt for hearing
Eliot’s resonant, mysterious language spoken with such sympathy was
disturbed by what the writer, in another of his famous poems, called
‘an overwhelming question’: how often does one hear the world’s
greatest language spoken with respect by its native speakers? Not
often in England, that’s for sure.
It is not only on the streets of our cities (and, increasingly,
our villages) that the verbal barbarians have taken over, with their
glottal stops and rising inflections. Turn on the radio or the
television, and anybody who cares for the sound and meaning of the
English language must recoil with horror at how it is abused by
those who make a living from speaking it. Although it is our
greatest gift to the world — and the world has not withheld its
thanks — too many English people are either unable to speak it
clearly, or, in the case of a metropolitan media class tainted by
inverted snobbery, they refuse to.
This is not a matter of accent, though it must be said that the
number of bogus proletarian voices on the airwaves has reached
epidemic proportions. Has anybody heard the continuity announcers on
the BBC recently? Plenty of broadcasters have spoken with
distinctive accents, and many, notably Benny Green, were
first-raters. Compare Green, whose London voice was genuine and
warm, with the ghastly Jonathan Ross and you can see how far we have
slipped. Where once there was elegance of delivery, now there is
cultivated oikism.
No, it is to do mainly with language: the colour, weight,
clarity, rhythm and articulation of words. Their meaning, in other
words. For every presenter or reporter who speaks clearly, like the
much mocked Ed Stourton, there are half a dozen guilty of elision,
omission, addition and exaggeration. Familiar words, names and
places are mispronounced. Verbs are left to fend for themselves —
‘troops arriving in Iraq’. The letter T (either ignored, or
pronounced as a D, as in ‘alodda’) is a lost cause. Even Andrew
Marr, the BBC political correspondent and a well-spoken man in most
respects, cannot say, ‘going to’. Instead he says — emphatically and
repeatedly — ‘gunner’.
Ah, ‘well-spoken’. There’s the rub! The most persistent
foot-soldiers in this Kulturkampf are those middle-class types who
feel that by speaking poorly as a matter of principle they are
expressing solidarity with that mythical sub-culture, ‘real people’.
Writing in this magazine recently, Charles Moore (who speaks well,
as Etonians should) observed that Ruth Kelly delivered a
‘breathtakingly graceless’ speech at a Spectator Parliamentarian of
the Year lunch four years ago ‘in an accent which she would never
have had while at Westminster School’. Of course she did. It would
never do for an ambitious Blairite to be seen consorting with enemy
forces. The assumption of an alien voice was her crass way of
saying, ‘I belong elsewhere.’
The Prime Minister himself is familiar with this stratagem. His
popular touch is not infallible (they didn’t do ‘demotic studies’ at
Fettes) but it doesn’t stop him trying to sound like a pop star,
which is really what he has always wanted to be. Man of the people
and all that guff. As Anthony Burgess, who spent most of his adult
life abroad, said, on one of his last visits to this country, ‘Only
in England is the perversion of language regarded as a victory for
democracy.’
These daring new democrats have established their base camp at
White City, and their centre of operations is Five Live, an outlet
dedicated almost entirely to the brutal suppression of decent English.
Other than the outstanding Brian Hayes, who is Australian, and Nicky
Campbell, the cocky Jock, the station is awash with mediocrities
who enjoy nothing more than speaking out of the corner of their
mouths and upsetting the balance of every sentence by emphasising
the wrong syllable. But even in this undistinguished gathering it
is possible to identify the worst offender. Step forward, Susan
Bookbinder, newsreader and (so she insists on reminding listeners
every few minutes) Manchester City fan.
This lady’s finest hour came two years ago, after the death of
Adam Faith. In the course of a single sentence, ‘born on a council
estate in west London, he was determined to make something of himself’,
she managed to put an incorrect stress on five syllables — ‘born’,
‘west’, ‘he’, ‘some’ and ‘him’. Even by Five Live’s lamentable standards
it was a virtuoso performance. Perhaps she ex-changed high fives
with her pro-ducer later.
Can we expect the BBC to take the lead in banishing Bookbinder
to the boondocks, and restoring good English to the airwaves? Mark
Thompson, the director-general, should remember what Auden said
about the first duty of poets, which was to act as ‘custodians of
the language’. If he doesn’t know what that means, he can turn to
Eliot, who commended a world in which ‘every phrase and sentence
is right’, with this amplification:
...where every word is at home,
Taking its place to support the others,
The word neither diffident nor ostentatious,
An easy commerce of the old and the new,
The common word exact without vulgarity,
The formal word precise but not pedantic,
The complete consort dancing together.
The Thompsons and Kellys of this world may feel that ‘the complete
consort’ sounds intolerably high-minded, that it is terribly ‘middle-class’
to impose high standards of speech on listeners in our value-free,
multicultural society. Nor are they alone. A government-funded study
led by Professor Richard Andrews of York University has concluded
that the teaching of grammar in schools is largely a waste of time.
So we are breeding another generation of gibbering halfwits.
In an ideal world it would be the BBC’s bounden duty to equip all
employees, on their first day at work, with two literary masterpieces:
‘Four Quartets’ and Orwell’s essay ‘Politics and the English Language’.
Until that blessed day dawns, can Jimmy Savile fix it for Fox and
Atkins to read the news?
|