|
|









ANCIENT & MODERN

Peter Jones
Parents who find the state education system
unsatisfactory but cannot afford private schooling are getting together
to hire tutors to teach their children at home. The Roman public servant
Pliny the Younger (AD 61–112) would have applauded. Pliny was visiting
his native town of Comum (modern Como) when he found out that the
young son of a fellow citizen was being taught not locally but in
faraway Mediolanum (Milan) — and he was not the only one. Baffled,
Pliny remonstrated with the fathers for not raising their children
in their native town where they belonged, adding that at home they
could also be guaranteed to be properly brought up. He then suggested
that they could all club together to engage their own teachers in
Como, spending on salaries what they now spent on travel, lodgings
and expenses for the children. In a burst of generosity, Pliny went
on to promise that he would contribute a third more to whatever sum
they raised.
Pliny then adds a fascinating coda, saying that he would in fact be
willing to promise the whole amount, only he was afraid that the authorities
might then take over and abuse his generosity ‘as I have seen in many
places where teachers’ salaries are paid from public funds’. The only
solution, he goes on, is that the appointments of teachers should
be made by the parents who pay for them. In that way, a wise and conscientious
choice will be made about how their own money is spent: ‘people who
may be careless about another person’s money are sure to be careful
about their own, and they will see to it that only a suitable recipient
shall be found for my money if he is also to have theirs.’ He goes
on to hope his proposal will be so successful that, far from sending
their children elsewhere, the parents will find children from elsewhere
coming to them.
The story is to be found in a letter Pliny wrote to his friend the
historian Tacitus, asking him if there was anyone he could recommend
for the particular post in question (though Pliny makes it clear that
the final choice will rest with the parents). For Pliny, both his
own and local pride were at stake here. He was not about to waste
his money on second-raters; nor will the parents behind the current
initiative. Nor, for that matter, should our schools, let alone our
teacher-training establishments. To adapt Thucydides, it is men and
women who are the schools, not the classrooms or playing fields. 
· Send comment on this article to the editor of the
Spectator.co.uk
© 2004 The Spectator.co.uk
|
|