|
|
 FEATURES  Reasons to be
cheerful Theodore Dalrymple on
the joy of seeing the extraordinary in the ordinary — in
gooseberries, for example, even in human beings
In my line of work, it is rather hard to think
of reasons to be cheerful. On the contrary, it requires quite a lot
of concentrated intellectual effort: one has the sensation of
scraping the bottom of one’s skull for thoughts that just aren’t
there. Of course, since lamentation about the state of the world is
one of life’s unfailing pleasures, the world is a greater source of
satisfaction than ever. Another consolation is that most people are
not nearly as miserable as they ought to be, or would be if they saw
their own lives in a clear light. I meet more than 1,000 people a
year who have tried to do away with themselves, and the wonder is
not that they should be so many but that they should be so few.
Reasons to be cheerful? Is that reasons for me to be cheerful, or
reasons for one, that is to say for humanity in general, to be
cheerful?
Thanks to the fact that I write, my life is
satisfactory: I can inhabit gloom and live in joy. When something
unpleasant happens to me, provided only that is potentially of
literary use, my first thought is ‘How best can I describe this?’ I
thereby distance myself from my own displeasure or irritation. As I
tell my patients, much to their surprise — for it is not a
fashionable view — it is far more important to be able to lose
yourself than to find yourself. I feel an inexpressible joy when
patients use the English language creatively, if not always
correctly according to the strictest canons. For all that it has
changed, England is still the land of Dickens, and our people are
still capable of the verbal inventiveness and felicities of Mrs Gamp
or Mrs Gummidge. Only the other day, for example, a patient
complained to me that there was a financial crisis, though, like Mrs
Gradgrind and the pain somewhere in the room, he could not
positively say that he had got it. He was able to add that a lot of
money had been spent, until it could be spent no more; but more than
that he could not say.
Then again, a man who came to
interview me for a publication the other day pointed out that I was
never bored. I hadn’t thought of that before, but it’s true: I’m
never bored. I’m appalled, horrified, angered, but never bored. The
world appears to me so infinite in its variety that many lifetimes
could not exhaust its interest. So long as you can still be
surprised, you have something to be thankful for (that is one of the
reasons why the false knowingness of street credibility is so
destructive of true happiness).
A few years ago, I went to
an exhibition of Spanish still lifes at the National Gallery, and
was taken aback, as were all visitors, by the paintings of Sanchez
Cotan, of whom I (and I suspect the great majority of visitors) had
previously known nothing. His paintings of fruit and vegetables,
suspended in a parabola in an open stone window, were among the most
moving that I have ever seen; and never again have I looked at
vegetables and fruit in the prosaic way I did before. Thanks to
Sanchez Cotan, I can see great beauty in a leek or a cabbage, or
even in a potato, to the great enrichment of my life. (I do not
think it a coincidence that Sanchez Cotan was a monk.) Not long
afterwards, I saw the paintings of the Dutchman, Adriaen Coorte, who
specialised in the humble art of painting gooseberries. The
translucence of this fruit now strikes me as so beautiful that I can
gaze at them with intense pleasure, if not for hours (that would be
an exaggeration), at least for minutes. I suspect that this
reflectiveness is one of the consolations of age.
Again,
subjects to which I previously gave no thought, and which I should
lightly have dismissed as being of no great interest, can suddenly
appear of enormous moment and fascination as the result of chance
meetings. A few years ago I was attending a murder trial when I had
the great good fortune to meet Dr Zakaria Erzinclioglu, who
introduced himself with the memorable words, ‘I’m just a simple fly
man.’ He was so self-deprecatingly humorous and ironic that one felt
an immediate affection (and deep respect) for him. He was, in fact,
the foremost forensic entomologist in the country, and it was upon
his evidence that the whole trial turned. You can often tell the
exact date of death of a corpse by the nature of the fauna that
feast upon it; and while we waited to enter the courtroom, Dr
Erzinclioglu brought out his graphs and tables, and showed me how,
by measuring the maggots of various species, it was possible to
arrive at the date of death of a corpse with an astonishing degree
of certainty. Under his infectiously enthusiastic tuition, I came to
believe that there was no more important or interesting study in the
world, and wished only that my life had taken a different path many
years ago. Nor has my interest ever quite subsided, and I have read
several books on the subject since, including some by him. I
discovered also that the simple fly man was a man of wide culture
and broad sympathies, who wrote good prose. Alas, Dr Erzinclioglu
died suddenly at a very early age, as I discovered one day from
reading the obituary page in the Daily Telegraph. I was sad, of
course, though I doubt that many men could face death more fulfilled
by their lives than he had been; but my brief acquaintance with him
reassured me that men of genuine worth, distinction and integrity
still exist, and can succeed. And for this we all have reason to be
cheerful.
No doubt I sometimes give the impression that I
myself lead a thankless life. This is not true. The other day, a
prisoner came up to me in the prison and thanked me for my help. I
couldn’t remember what I had done for him and he reminded me. His
thanks, which were obviously sincere, meant more to me than any more
tangible reward could have done. There is no work more worthwhile
than to help the defenceless, but you can’t help them if you
sentimentalise them. All in all, my life is a rich one, and it is
rich because the world is so much richer than my life can ever be. I
don’t think I will lose interest in the world until the day I die,
and my only regret is that I will not have long enough to learn much
more than I have learnt. (Not long ago, I went to a wonderful
exhibition in Paris of Ethiopian illuminated manuscripts, and
regretted that I will never be reborn to become an Ethiopianist. How
shallow, mean-spirited and unimaginative Evelyn Waugh’s
condescending attitude to Ethiopia seemed, and still seems, to me,
by the way.)
I try to enthuse my patients with the glory of
the world, with indifferent success, I must admit. It is almost as
if they wanted the world to be boring, to justify their own lack of
interest in it. To be bored and disabused is taken by many people
nowadays as a sign of spiritual election or superiority, as if the
world does not quite come up to their exacting standards. With the
right attitude, though, very small things, such as an inscription in
a second-hand book, can kindle enthusiasm and joy. Recently, for
example, I bought a little volume published in 1816, entitled The
Danger of Premature Interment Proved from Many Remarkable Instances
of People who Recovered after Being Laid out for Dead, and Others
Entombed Alive, for Want of Being Properly Examined prior to
Interment. A pencil inscription of the same era on the title page
read, ‘Any person who delights in good cock-and-bull stories, here
he will find them to his heart’s content.’ I love trying to imagine
the person who wrote this brief message to posterity. So long as the
world is inexhaustibly interesting, we have reason to be cheerful.
Return
to top of page  · Send comment on this article to the editor of the
Spectator.co.uk · Email this article to a friend
© 2003 The
Spectator.co.uk
| |