Race and Economics
by Thomas Sowell
Recently
by Thomas Sowell: Taxes
and Politics
Walter Williams
fans are in for a treat – and people who are not Walter Williams
fans are in for a shock – when they read his latest book, Race
and Economics.
It is a demolition
derby on paper, as Professor Williams destroys one after another
of the popular fallacies about the role of race in the American
economy.
I can still
vividly recall the response to one of Walter's earliest writings,
back in the 1970s, when he and I were working on the same research
project in Washington. Walter wrote a brief article that destroyed
the central theme of one of the fashionable books of the time, "The
Poor Pay More."
It was true,
he agreed, that prices were higher in low-income minority neighborhoods.
But he rejected the book's claim that this was due to "exploitation,"
"racism" and the like.
Having written
a doctoral dissertation on this subject, Walter then proceeded to
show why there were higher costs of doing business in many low-income
neighborhoods, and that these costs were simply passed on to the
consumers there.
What I remember
especially vividly is that, in reply, someone called Walter "a white
racist." Not many people had seen Walter at that time. But it was
also a sad sign of how name-calling had replaced thought when it
came to race.
The same issue
is explored in Chapter 6 of Race and Economics. The clinching
argument is that, despite higher markups in prices in low-income
neighborhoods, there is a lower than average rate of return for
businesses there – one of the reasons why businesses tend to avoid
such neighborhoods.
My own favorite
chapter in Race and Economics is Chapter 3, which I think
is the most revealing chapter in the book.
That chapter
begins, "Some might find it puzzling that during times of gross
racial discrimination, black unemployment was lower and blacks were
more active in the labor force than they are today." Moreover, the
duration of unemployment among blacks was shorter than among whites
between 1890 and 1900, whereas unemployment has become both higher
and longer-lasting among blacks than among whites in more recent
times.
None of this
is explainable by what most people believe or say in the media or
in academia. But it is perfectly consistent with the economics of
the marketplace and the consequences of political interventions
in the marketplace.
Race and
Economics explains how such interventions impact blacks and
other minorities, whether in housing markets, the railroad industry
or the licensing of taxicabs – and irrespective of the intentions
behind the government's actions.
Minimum wage
laws are classic examples. The last year in which the black unemployment
rate was lower than the white unemployment rate was 1930. That was
also the last year in which there was no federal minimum wage law.
The Davis-Bacon
Act of 1931 was in part a result of a series of incidents in which
non-union black construction labor enabled various contractors from
the South to underbid Northern contractors who used white, unionized
construction labor.
The Davis-Bacon
Act required that "prevailing wages" be paid on government construction
projects – "prevailing wages" almost always meaning in practice
union wages. Since blacks were kept out of construction unions then,
and for decades thereafter, many black construction workers lost
their jobs.
Minimum
wages were required more broadly under the National Industrial Recovery
Act of 1933 and under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, with
negative consequences for black employment across a much wider range
of industries.
In
recent times, we have gotten so used to young blacks having sky-high
unemployment rates that it will be a shock to many readers of Walter
Williams' Race and Economics to discover that the unemployment
rate of young blacks was once only a fraction of what it has been
in recent decades. And, in earlier times, it was not very different
from the unemployment rate of young whites.
The factors
that cause the most noise in the media are not the ones that have
the most impact on minorities. This book will be eye-opening for
those who want their eyes opened. But those with the liberal vision
of the world are unlikely to read it at all.
April
27, 2011
Thomas
Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford
University. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.
To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other
Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators
Syndicate web page.
The
Best of Thomas Sowell
Copyright ©
2011 Creators Syndicate
|