In an age
in which life, itself, has become a perilous threat to our well-being;
in which the normally neurotic among us demand collective security
against every conceivable uncertainty generated by either man
or nature, we are slowly becoming aware of what may prove to be
the greatest peril ever to face the planet. It is not "global
warming," which is a piddling threat when compared with this
more menacing one.
The threat
of which I write is one that has recently been brought to our
attention by astronomers and physicists. They tell us that our
galaxy – the Milky Way – is on a collision course with another
galaxy – Andromeda. In a scant three billion years, these two
galaxies will likely merge to form a super-galaxy that has already
been named: Milkomeda. (I wonder if intelligent observers in Andromeda
might object to taking second-billing in this name. Perhaps they
would opt for "Andromeway" in the unlikelihood of their
having the same names that we employ for these galaxies.)
In any event,
three billion years does give us a reasonable amount of time to
"do something" about this impending danger. Government-funded
research grants can be awarded to academicians to help plan the
systems and technologies necessary to the collective effort that
will be required. The politically-driven – long accustomed to
both generating and exploiting widespread fear to the end of securing
power over the lives of their neighbors – will see in the upcoming
"galaxy crash" (how’s that for a catchy label?) as yet
another opportunity to terrify their fellow humans with the unpredictable
and inconstant nature of existence. Consistent with their claims
to omniscience in all matters, these "people-pushers"
will again promise to "find out what went wrong and fix it,
so that it doesn’t happen again!"
In case any
of you are not aware of the gargantuan nature of the task of "doing
something" about this threat, imagine a swirling galaxy the
size of the room in which you are sitting. Then imagine a pin-point
located in the outer reaches of that galaxy: that point is our
solar system. Keeping in mind that Earth is one of the smaller
planets in this solar system and, well, you can begin to grasp
the scope of the task before us. St. Al and his gaggle of self-styled
"environmentalists" have their priorities askew. To
focus upon global warming in the face of this greater threat is
akin to regarding the devastation of a worldwide nuclear war of
lesser import than the curse of infected hangnails!
How do we
confront this great peril? To begin with, we must demonize
the approaching galaxy; to treat it as an invading enemy,
in much the same way we have learned to regard immigrants. We
humans are not only willing, but eager, to participate in collective
campaigns, but only if they are undertaken against some "evil"
force to be thought of as an "enemy." Most of us love
wars, and are prepared to mobilize against anyone or anything
that discommodes us. Our "wars" on "poverty,"
"drugs," "discrimination," "cancer,"
"violence" (an interesting contradiction), "obesity,"
"child abuse," "global warming" – indeed,
a war against anything but war itself – reflect a propensity to
regard life itself as an enemy to be ferreted out and warred against.
The unregulated forces of the cosmos can be seen as another example
of what can happen when nature is left to its own devices, free
of political controls.
This is not
the time to invoke the thinking of Einstein, and regard the movements
of Andromeda and Milky Way as "relative" to one another.
If our political leaders are to effectively deal with this situation,
Andromeda must be seen as attacking "us." "We"
will then be seen – by "us" – as "victims"
engaged in "galaxy defense."
Creating
such a mindset is the purpose of the mainstream media. CNN and
the other cable "news" channels can begin providing
reports on the impending "crash"; Lou Dobbs can offer
his daily commentaries on the problems that arise from allowing
outsiders to cross our borders. The gang at Faux News will remind
us of the dangers of unregulated travel, as well as the consequences
of failing to build restraining fences. Public opinion polls will
be utilized to test whether the prolonged conditioning in the
unquestioned premises of the campaign has been sufficient to convince
Boobus of the nature of the threat such that he/she will
insist that the government do what it had planned to do all along.
This struggle
will demand the greatest sacrifices of us all. No amount of money
or authority siphoned off by our political leaders can be thought
of as too great. This is not some isolated Star Wars threat,
in which we must defend ourselves against a giant "Death
Star": we are menaced by an entire galaxy, intent on "taking
over" the whole damned universe! Its plans have already
been set in motion; its forces approach in silence, as your beautiful
children sleep peacefully in their beds!
I have no
doubt as to the willingness or the capacities of corporate enterprises
to mobilize on behalf of this enormous defensive effort. Wars
have taught us how eager so much of the business community is
to participate in "partnerships" with the state when
both are able to profit nicely from the arrangement. World Wars
I and II, the Cold War, and now the War on Terror – along with
its wholly-owned subsidiary the Iraq War – not only confirm Randolph
Bourne’s observation that "war is the health of the state,"
but extends its beneficent effects to the corporate world.
Universities
– ever on the prowl for government research grants that can segue
into opportunities for corporations to cash in on developing and
manufacturing technologies – can help provide the scientific base
for the upcoming galaxy war. Astronomers will advise us that there
are billions of galaxies in the universe, each prepared
to continue the onslaught undertaken by Andromeda.
Given the
spiraled nature of our galaxy, scientists may propose that we
do something to reverse its direction – a position that the galaxy-hawk
"hard-liners" may oppose as a "cut-and-run"
strategy. But assuming the re-orbiting faction prevails, academia
and the technocrats may soon be offering blueprints for reversing
the orbits of the planets in our solar system. While we remain
but a fly-speck in our vast galactic setting, we must begin somewhere.
After all, if we humans can put men on the moon, reversing the
orbits of the likes of Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune involve nothing
more than a commitment of will.
Putting
the galaxy in reverse gear will require a change in our thinking.
Political leaders can remind us to "ask not what your galaxy
can do for you, but what you can do for your galaxy." T-shirts
and bumper-stickers will abound with such messages as "The
Milky Way: Love It or Leave It!" If the Milky Way spirals
in a clockwise manner, we must begin to think in counter-clockwise
terms. Clocks, themselves, will need to be redesigned to run in
the opposite direction to which we are accustomed. We must learn
to walk and drive backwards; to write – as some among us do –
from right to left; and to awaken at night, work through evening
and daylight hours, and go to sleep in the morning hours. Those
among us who resist such reversing policies will be labeled "Andromedan
terrorists" or "spies" or "traitors."
Contrary
to the assumptions in our current AlGorithmic thinking, we may
find ourselves having to produce even more highly-sophisticated
technologies that will generate even greater quantities of carbon
dioxide. The people-pushers – having admonished us to sacrifice
our interests in the name of saving the planet may now
find themselves having to sacrifice their ideological interests
in the name of saving the galaxy!
The enemy
will soon be upon us. A few billion years may sound like an eternity
to you, but this is not the time for dilatory foot-dragging. If
Andromeda can get away with this sneak attack upon us, think of
all the other galaxies – to be identified, perhaps, as the "axies
of evil"? – that might be preparing their attacks.
If we don’t stop them now, we’ll have to stop them later.
The time
to act is now! Do it for the children!