Socialism
in the EU
by
Nima Sanandaji
by Nima Sanandaji
There are increasing
signs that socialist ideas are gaining influence in the EU. A few
days ago the EU commission released a communication titled Promoting
decent work in the world. Decent work is, according to the commission,
a concept that stands for jobs with better welfare protection, "social
dialogue" and equal opportunity. Not only would the EU strive for
more such policies in Europe, but also abroad.
This Thursday
(the first of June) the EU parliament is voting on a bill that,
if passed, would dramatically change the EU policies regarding trade,
globalization and poverty. The proposal amongst others states that
there is no clear connection between trade, development and reduction
of poverty and that bringing down trade barriers threatens poor
countries. It explains that we need an international trade system
which aims to create full employment and enhance environmental development.
Trade is, in other words, not the voluntary exchange of goods between
individuals and companies, but a policy tool for politicians to
bring societal change.
We seem to
live in a time where the same socialist ideas that previously have
failed around the world are resurfacing under new names such as
fair trade, decent work and corporate social responsibility. Few
EU politicians seem to realize that the poverty in African countries,
for example, mainly depend on the fact that this continent has the
least capitalism in the world but is over riddled with state intervention,
trade barriers and experiments in so-called African socialism. Even
fewer seem to understand that concepts such as fair trade only spell
more problems for international development.
Unfortunately
the free market movement in Europe remains silent about the policy
shift towards leftist economic thinking that is occurring in the
EU. The Swedish free market author Johan Norberg is among the few
who has reacted. On his blog
he writes:
"On Thursday,
after a debate on Wednesday, there is a risk that the European
Parliament will say that it prefers redistribution to the creation
of resources, that developing countries need more protectionism,
that more EU market access is threatening poor countries, that
we must resist 'the invasion of Chinese products', that we need
controls to stabilise the price of natural resources, should undermine
intellectual property rights, and stop goods and services from
poor countries that don't abide by 'strong and enforced rules
of protection on the environment and social rights'."
Norberg explains
that these ideas are very destructive, and indeed he is right. The
policies of protectionism, foreign aid and planned economies have
all been implemented in numerous third world countries and have
all failed. However, countries such as China and India have experienced
rapid growth and poverty reduction by moving towards property rights,
free trade and free markets. This has benefited billions of people
who live in these countries, but also consumers and producers in
other nations.
It should be
evident for any clear thinking policy maker that economic freedom
leads to development and that socialist policies, even though packaged
in new slogans, will lead to stagnation and poverty. We can only
hope that there are some clear thinking individuals left in the
EU Commission who will resist adapting planned economy over free
markets.
Thanks to Henrik
Alexandersson for providing information about the development
in the EU Commission.
Update:
According to Swedish writer and blogger Henrik Alexandersson it
seems as if the bill has indeed passed. It has however been altered
– some of the socialist rhetoric is gone and some free trade ideas
have been included.
Unfortunately,
it seems as if the EU has indeed taken a step towards socialism.
The bill that passed still includes leftwing ideas, such as that
third world countries benefit from government distribution of income,
that aid should be increased, that trade unions should have more
power, that entire sectors should potentially be excluded from free
trade, and that corporate social responsibility is positive.
Link
to where Alexandersson writes about the bill that passed (in
Swedish).
June
5, 2006
Nima
Sanandaji [send him mail]
is president of the Swedish think tank Captus and the editor of
Captus Journal. He is
a graduate student in biochemistry at the University of Cambridge.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Nima
Sanandaji Archives
|