Distortion
of Dorner Manifesto by Mainstream Media
by
Michael S. Rozeff
Recently
by Michael S. Rozeff: Why
Pick on Targeted Killing? Indict the State
Expect
severe distortion of the Dorner Manifesto by the MSM. You cannot
simply read headlines and expect to know anything. You have to do
more research than that to understand any issue. You also cannot
read only the news articles of one or a few sources, especially
the established or mainstream media. These routinely editorialize
within so-called news accounts. They selectively choose and distort
material.
A case in point
is an article popping up in Google news that
is here. It is written by Sharon Bernstein and it's under an
NBC affiliate (4NBC Southern California). I have also already seen
and read a CNN article that interspersed misleading editorial statements
with quotes from the Dorner Manifesto. Bernstein's article is totally
irresponsible journalism.
Ms. Bernstein
msinterpets Dorner as choosing victims on the basis of race and
sex bias. This is completely false!! In each case where race and
sex are mentioned, he focuses on their behavior and what he charges
them with doing. More on that below.
Her headline
reads "Manifesto: Alleged Cop Revenge Shooter Named Targets,
Blamed Asians, Hispanics and Lesbians."
Dorner DOES
NOT BLAME Asians, Hispanics and Lesbians per se. In each case, he
blames them for specific reasons. These reasons are lousy reasons
for murder, to be sure. But it is clear that he is not targeting
various members of the LAPD for their race or sexual preference
alone, but for their BEHAVIOR as he sees it.
I will first
provide three quotes that show that he has nothing at all against
the LGBT community:
"Ellen
Degeneres, continue your excellent contribution to entertaining
America and bringing the human factor to entertainment. You changed
the perception of your gay community and how we as Americans view
the LGBT community. I congratulate you on your success and opening
my eyes as a young adult, and my generation to the fact that you
are know different from us other than who you choose to love."
"It's
time to allow gay service member's spouses to utilize the same benefits
that all heterosexual dependents are eligible for. Medical, Dental,
Tricare, Deers, SGLI, BX, Commissary, Milstar, MWR, etc. Flag officers,
lets be honest. You can't really give a valid argument to as why
gays shouldn't be eligible as every month a new state enacts laws
that allow same sex marriage."
"LGBT
community and supporters, the same way you have the right to voice
your opinion on acceptance of gay marriage, Chick Fil-A has a right
to voice their beliefs as well. That's what makes America so great.
Freedom of expression. Don't be assholes and boycott/degrade their
business and customers who patronize the locations. They make some
damn good chicken! Vandalizing (graffiti) their locations does not
help any cause."
What does he
say about lesbian officers in general, as a class? Nothing. He singles
out certain ones that he thinks are treating males unfairly who
are under their supervision:
"Those
lesbian officers in supervising positions who go to work, day in
day out, with the sole intent of attempting to prove your misandrist
authority (not feminism) to degrade male officers. You are a high
value target."
Dorner says
that he is making certain LAPD police, characterized by race, as
his targets, each because of a different reason. It is the reasons
that are important to him, not the race per se. In each case, race
comes in because it is linked to a particular injustice that he
perceives and dislikes.
Take the case
of Hispanics:
"Those
Hispanic officers who victimize their own ethnicity because they
are new immigrants to this country and are unaware of their civil
rights. You call them wetbacks to their face and demean them in
front of fellow officers of different ethnicities so that you will
receive some sort of acceptance from your colleagues. I'm not impressed.
Most likely, your parents or grandparents were immigrants at one
time, but you have forgotten that. You are a high value target."
Dorner sees
an injustice in Hispanic police who mistreat other Hispanics in
order to get ahead in the LAPD.
Ms. Bernstein
failed to mention that Dorner, who is black, also targets certain
Black officers and certain Caucasian officers, again, not for their
race per se but because of a perceived injustice.
In the case
of Black supervisors, he is concerned with those who demean white
officers under their authority:
"Those
Black officers in supervisory ranks and pay grades who stay in south
bureau (even though you live in the valley or OC) for the sole intent
of getting retribution toward subordinate caucasians officers for
the pain and hostile work environment their elders inflicted on
you as probationers (P-1's) and novice P-2s. You are a high
value target. You perpetuated the cycle of racism in the department
as well. You breed a new generation of bigoted caucasian officer
when you belittle them and treat them unfairly."
In the case
of white officers, he is concerned with those who are intent on
victimizing minorities:
"Those
Caucasian officers who join South Bureau divisions (77th,SW,SE,
an Harbor) with the sole intent to victimize minorities who are
uneducated, and unaware of criminal law, civil law, and civil rights.
You prefer the South bureau because a use of force/deadly force
is likely and the individual you use UOF on will likely not report
it. You are a high value target."
Dorner
does indeed categorize his targets by race, as Ms. Bernstein's article
partially reports. This is not central to his thought or action.
Mistreatment of subordinates is central to his thinking, and this
includes his personal case and his personal frustrations with getting
the LAPD to change. Dorner's case should not be transformed by irresponsible
reporting into the acts of a person motivated by racial hatreds.
Neither should he be dismissed as one who is "mentally ill".
He has made
himself judge, jury and executioner. That's for sure. In this respect,
he echoes President Obama with his targeted killings. He even uses
the same term, target. Both have their reasons for their killing.
Both are wrong.
February
14, 2013
Michael
S. Rozeff [send him mail]
is a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York.
He is the author of the free e-book Essays
on American Empire: Liberty vs. Domination and the free e-book
The U.S. Constitution
and Money: Corruption and Decline.
Copyright
© 2013 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
The
Best of Michael S. Rozeff
|