The Cause of Empire
by
Michael S. Rozeff
by Michael S. Rozeff
DIGG THIS
Aggressive
foreign policy causes no end of misery. How can we alter the aggressive
foreign policy of the U.S.? We need to diagnose its cause before
prescribing a cure.
Wilhelm Röpke,
in his book, International
Order and Economic Integration, makes the case that aggressive
foreign policy does not stem, as the Marxists would have it, from
capitalism or finance capitalism. He writes:
It is true
that in such cases the chain of cause and effect contains economic
links, but it ends finally in the field in which, contrary to
the materialistic interpretation of history, all decisions take
place: the field of politics, power, ideology, psychology, sociology,
emotionalism. Everything which at a superficial glance seems to
indicate that capitalism is the villain of the piece proves upon
more thorough examination to be entirely fallacious. It only proves
that, under the present economic system as well as under any other,
stupidity, egoism, greed and falsehood can carry on their evil
work against peace, as long as reason, public spirit, moderation
and truth are not able to keep them under control. Not the imaginary
inescapable fatalism of the economic laws of capitalism are to
be denounced, but human default.
I agree in
part. Röpke is correct to trace empire, based on politics and
power, back to the human being. And he is correct to reject market
exchange or ownership of capital as causes.
But we need
to go further. It will appear to be superficial to trace empire
and its wars back to the human being. We wish to change this evil
behavior, if we can. To do that, we need to understand its cause
or causes, if we can. So we ask: From whence inside the human being
does the "evil work against peace" arise? From man’s reason?
From his will? From his imagination? From his ego? From his emotions?
From his desires? From his heart (his essence)? From all of these?
Where shall we turn to find the answer?
Röpke
locates the source primarily in reason and ego. But there is far
more to evil than "human default" and "stupidity,"
which encompass human error and human blundering. Röpke comes
closer when he speaks of egoism. But mere arrogance, self-interest,
and pride still do not fully hit the mark in understanding evil,
although egoism as self-worship does. Nor does Röpke hit home
in characterizing evil when he speaks of falsehood versus truth,
for what he means by falsehood is rather narrow. He means Machiavellian
falsehood or intentional lying (akin to fraud and use of force)
in the service of gain and advantage. Although Röpke gives
us some clues, we need to go further if we are to diagnose evil
and prescribe a remedy.
The Holy Bible
provides us with insight as to the location of evil. We find clearly
stated the prime location of evil in man. "And God saw that
the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination
of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." (Genesis
6:5.) Also: "...and the LORD said in his heart, I will not
again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination
of man's heart is evil from his youth;" (Genesis 8:21.) Proverb
12:20 says "Deceit is in the heart of them that imagine evil."
Jesus says: "And Jesus knowing their thoughts said, Wherefore
think ye evil in your hearts?" (Matthew 9:4) And also: "A
good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good
things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth
evil things." (Matthew 12:35.)
According to
God’s Word, man’s evil runs deep, as deep as it can go, pervading
his very essence. Evil is within man’s heart. The evil is manifested
in all the facets of man: his mind, his will, his imagination, his
wants, his emotions, and so on, but the source runs deeper than
any single one of these. Each of these aspects places specific evils
on display, like vanity, pride, selfishness, falsehood, and immoderation.
As Jesus put it: "Even so every good tree bringeth forth good
fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit." (Matthew
7:17.) The whole tree is corrupt.
When Röpke
speaks of "reason, public spirit, moderation and truth"
as keeping "stupidity, egoism, greed and falsehood" "under
control," in order to achieve peace, he is very, very far from
giving the Biblical view of the matter. In the Biblical diagnosis,
the solution cannot be from within man in and of himself via his
own self-control because the evil pervades man from top to bottom.
A corrupt tree cannot bring forth good fruit, not unless that corruption
is alleviated.
The evil of
man relates directly to authority and its imposition on other men.
But the latter evil relates directly to man’s relationship with
God. We are told throughout the Bible that man’s evil, which is
his sin, is sin "in the sight of the LORD." This evil
provokes God and incurs his wrath. And the reason for this is that
the evil came about by the rejection of God. Man through concrete
action in the Garden showed his unbelief in God’s instruction and
authority. Man made himself the authority and simultaneously rejected
the authority of God. The only other possible authority left to
man after rejecting God’s authority was himself.
But there are
many men on earth. Having rejected God, men surely reject each other
as authorities, because men are lesser beings. They are left in
the uncomfortable position of seeking a final authority on the earth.
Who among them is the ultimate authority? Obviously, from the perspective
of the Bible, none of them are. They cannot possibly find a man
among themselves who is the ultimate authority. There is little
recourse among those who reject God’s authority but to attempt to
make themselves the authority. They cannot succeed, but, in reflection
of the evil in their hearts, they try. They attempt to dominate
one another. In the political realm, gross misuses of the State
manifest these attempts.
Empire and
war involve extensions of man’s authority via the State. One set
of men wishes to rule another set of men. There is a restless search
for the authority of some men over other men. And, by the way, those
leaders who have a deep need to demonstrate their authority, no
matter what their professed relationship is to God, can be the most
dangerous.
As areas of
human behavior related to empire and war, Röpke mentions "the
field of politics, power, ideology, psychology, sociology, emotionalism."
To mention too much beclouds the matter. The problem is sin, specifically,
evil in the heart brought about by rejection of God. To reject God’s
authority is to accept man’s authority. The logical consequence
is a struggle to be number one on earth. Aggressive foreign policy
quite directly traces back to the rejection of God’s authority.
Man,
being the evil creature he is, he also misinterprets God’s Word
on behalf of aggressive foreign policy. This problem is a very serious
one addressed by a number of LRC columnists such as Bill
Barnwell and Laurence
M. Vance
We should know
what we are up against. The cure for empire and war is by no means
simple since it involves a multitude of human hearts and God. And
it involves a serious degree of transformation. But there is healing
available.
October
10, 2007
Michael
S. Rozeff [send him mail]
is a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Michael
S. Rozeff Archives
|