The ability
to make and keep confidential relationships and have confidential
communications is as vital to a free and independent people as the
freedom of speech. Without the ability to think, speak, associate,
and act in privacy, if you so choose, an individual cannot truly
be autonomous. Just ask Justin
Timberlake. "The worst thing about being famous is the invasion
of your privacy." If you are jealous of their fame, you can experience
a similar degree of exposure as the uber-famous. Modern bank
privacy rules treat us all like celebrities in the worst way.
We have our own paparazzi who will chase us, in the form of banking
surveillance, until we love them. Maybe someone needs to get JT
a copy of the How To
Vanish book to show him how to protect his own privacy a little
more.
Bank
Privacy And Its Relation To Other Protected Forms of Privacy
In the US,
there are still some fortresses of privacy. For example, communications
between an attorney and a client are still subject to very rigorous
protection from disclosure for almost any purpose. The state of
California protects these communications better than any other state,
and even conflicts with federal law in favor of privacy over disclosure.
Doctor-patient relationships, priest-penitent, the marital relationship
and a few others continue to be protected.
One of the
most important things to keep private, however, is not protected,
the ability to have financial and bank
privacy. The bank-depositor relationship is as important as
almost any other protected relationship. Economic control over someone
creates the relationship of master and servant. If you are subject
to scrutiny for every bank
transaction, regardless of suspicion, you are threatened with
that economic control and servitude. This is true regardless of
whether or not the threat is carried out. Even though your private
bank has access to this information, the private bank does not have
the power to arrest, prosecute, seize assets, or enforce capital
punishment. Forced disclosure of account information puts the information
in the hands of those who have that power. If you do not like what
one private bank does with your information, you can move to a new
private bank. If you are a US citizen, you cannot move your money
to a new jurisdiction if you do not like the economic control being
used or threatened. Do you love them yet?
Historical
Examples Of Bank Privacy
Bank privacy
has played a valiant role throughout history to improve the economic
situation of entire countries and even to save the lives of thousands.
Centuries ago, hawala banking sprang out of the Middle East and
Asia, in part because the transactions prevented theft when transporting
large amounts of money over long distances. More recently, the hawala
system was used to bolster the legitimate economic needs of the
people of Somalia when formal banking institutions, subject to the
regular privacy demolishing disclosures, refused to deal with Somalia
which was controlled by criminal gangs. When the US government restricted
hawala transactions with Somalia, there was a massive meltdown of
the support system for innocent Somali citizens and thousands of
them suffered severe economic consequences. Do you love them yet?
But you’ve
got to be kidding. How can bank privacy save lives? During the Hitler
era in Germany, it became a capital offense for a German Jew to
have a foreign bank account. In reaction to Germany executing a
handful of Jews under this law, Switzerland increased the strength
of its protection of bank privacy, making it a civil and criminal
offense to release information on any account. The German government
was no longer able to search the records of Swiss banks to persecute
the depositors and thousands of German citizens were able to avoid
execution. There is no guarantee that other oppressive countries
will not attempt do the same thing now or in the future as Germany.
Current
Legal Environment
Confidentiality
and non-disclosure agreements are widely used in many economic situations,
such as employment or purchase agreements for example, why not in
banking? There are numerous laws and treaties which require forced
disclosures of information about your bank accounts. Several years
ago, the US Supreme court decided United
States v. Miller, holding that there is no expectation of privacy
of information revealed to a third party, specifically considering
bank records. Although the correctness of this holding is arguable
in the absence of an explicit confidentiality agreement, the reasoning
behind the supreme court ruling has been contorted and stretched
to the limit, not only permitting banks to disclose information
regarding your account, but requiring them to. Because the bank
might divulge your secret, they must divulge it, regardless of suspicion
of crime.
FinCEN, the
Bank Secrecy Act, the PATRIOT Act, and other laws prevent banks
and depositors from exercising their right to confidentiality. Like
surveillance
cameras with motion sensors, every time you make a significant
financial movement, the government is notified of your activity
without your knowledge. These suspicionless financial strip searches
“do
not belong in a free country,” especially when they are conducted
on US citizens who open bank accounts all over the world. The only
other people subject to a strip search under such limited suspicion
are prisoners. Still not in love?
Conclusion
The ability
to live our lives free of financial surveillance is diminishing.
Using the right combination of techniques to avoid financial surveillance
like hawala
banking, using
cash and other
techniques can keep you from being exposed. It is important
to at least become familiar with the best offshore jurisdictions
that protect
your bank privacy. If you are more serious about bank privacy,
you may consider becoming
a resident of a country which has stronger bank privacy laws.
If you wonder about whether your banking practices might incur legal
liability in the US you should seek
an attorney to advise you on those issues. Protecting bank privacy
can also help you to avoid
tax liability when traveling outside of the tax-free states.
Bill
Rounds, J.D. is a California attorney. He holds a degree in Accounting
from the University of Utah and a law degree from California
Western School of Law. He practices civil litigation, domestic
and foreign business entity formation and transactions, criminal
defense and privacy law. He is a strong advocate of personal and
financial freedom and civil liberties.