Since the collapse of the despotic centralizing USSR, we all know
that nationality after once-submerged nationality has arisen to seek,
and often achieve, ethnic justice at long last. Triple R has
been in the forefront of the clamor for ethnic justice and self-government,
from the Slovenes to the Abkhazians, from the Chechens to the Croats.
We have tried to track all of them, and to sort out their often tangled
conflicts. Generally, they have done pretty well; even the most despised
and oppressed of all, the Germans, have achieved the unity of West
and what was falsely called "East" Germany (actually, it was Middle
Germany, and there are the lost lands to the real East,
but that's another and sadder story). But in all this reaching for
a place in the sun, one oppressed and despised ethnic group remains
immobile, and no one seems to care: I speak of the marvelous and ancient
people, the Hungarians. No banners wave for the restoration of justice
to the Hungarians; undoubtedly achievement of such justice would be
inconvenient to the New World Order, an order that is grounded squarely
on the "territorial integrity" of borders as they existed before 1989
or 1991; but heck, the Croats and Slovenes happily got away with such
breaches in "territorial integrity," and there is no reason why the
Hungarians cannot do the same.
Just as Germany was shattered and torn apart by the monstrous Treaty
of Versailles in 1919, so Hungary, also burdened with phony "war
guilt" for World War I by the victorious and vengeful Entente powers
(Britain and France), was carved up by the equally monstrous and
corollary Treaty of Trianon the following year. In rewriting the
map of Europe after World War I, the Wilsonian slogan of "national
self-determination" for each ethnic group was used like the Orwellian
slogan in Animal Farm: ethnic groups discovered that some
were more equal than others; some ethnic groups were set by the
post-war order to rule over others. Poor Hungary was shorn of fully
one-third of its ethnic and linguistic brethren. And, after all
the vicissitudes of the next seventy years, this situation still
obtains. Hungary now is Hungary after Trianon; several hundred thousand
Hungarians groan under Slovak (instead of Czech) tyranny in southern
Slovakia; and the Hungarians who people the northern Vojvodina are
now suffering under direct Serb rule, after previously enjoying
semi-autonomous status. And most grievous of all is the status of
legendary Transylvania, the land of Dracula and other classic vampires.
Transylvania was torn from the Hungarian bosom at Trianon and given
to "pro-Western" Romania, and Stalin put it back the same way after
World War II.
Is Transylvania ethnically Hungarian or Romanian? Both nationalities
are in this land, and it is obviously a matter of much dispute.
The distinguished historian Bela Kiraly, a top general in Hungary
who escaped to the West after the heroic and failed Revolution of
1956, told me, when I asked him about ethnic boundaries in Transylvania:
"I hate to say this, but Hitler's imposed boundary was probably
about the best solution." The point is that, during World War II,
both Hungary and Romania had right-wing governments friendly to
Germany, so that Hitler could afford to be "objective" and concentrate
on ethnic justice between the two. Hitler granted northern Transylvania
to Hungary, and southern to Romania. Friends of mine claim, however,
that this shortchanged Hungary which should have obtained either
the northern two-thirds, or even all, of Transylvania.
And then there is the neglected problem of Carpatho-Ruthenia, the
eastern tail grabbed from Hungary by the Czechs after World War
I. After World War II, this land was incorporated into the western
Ukraine, Ukraine claiming that these were long-lost Ukrainians.
I understand that the Ruthenians are beginning to make noises about
independence, of wanting out of the Ukraine. In any case, it seems
that Hungarian ethnic claims to this small area are fairly weak.
But, in any case, why is nothing more said and done about restoring
Hungary? Hungary's territory should definitely be expanded to include:
southern Slovakia, the northern Vojvodina in Serbia, and something
like two-thirds of Transylvania. Hungarians arise!
Of course, there are nationalist stirrings in Hungary; technically
these are irredentist, dedicated to redeeming unredeemed
lands lost to an ethnic nationality. The great playwright Istvan
Czurka, leader of a nationalist faction of the ruling party in Hungary,
is calling for such a movement. More militantly, agitation is led
by the "1956 Anti-Fascist and Anti-Bolshevik Association," headed
by the artist Istvan Porubszky, who had fled to Canada after 1956.
The 1956 Association is also organizing teenage youth, called the
National Conservative-Thinking Boys, who listen to lectures on Hungarian
history, celebrate statues of the turul, a mythological eagle-like
bird that symbolizes Hungarian unity, and shout "Down with Trianon!"
Only one guess how these groups and this agitation is regarded
by the "pro-Western" (i.e., Social Democrat) Hungarian establishment,
plus the Social Democrats of the New York Times and the rest
of the U.S. received opinion. Like all Social Democrats, who hate
and revile all nationalisms except that of the U.S. and Israel,
these groups fear and loathe these nationalists, the youth being
denounced as "skinheads" simply because the teenage lads like to
wear their hair crew-cut.
It's clear that Hungarians will never achieve their true place
in the sun so long as their rulers are more interested in currying
favor with the United States government than they are in justice
for themselves.
(Once again, I take the opportunity to declare that I am not a
descendent of, related to, or connected in any way, with any of
the ethnic groups I have celebrated in Triple R. Except in
spirit, I am not Hungarian nor a Croat nor an Abkhazian.)