Super
Cize Me
by
Mike (in Tokyo) Rogers
by Mike (in Tokyo) Rogers
Have you ever
stopped to wonder why you do some of the things you do? I’ll bet
you think that the things you do are common sense, but if you stopped
to consider some of them from a different point of view, you’d realize
just how outrageously foolish they look.
It’s
a bit like what your parents used to ask you, "If everybody
jumped off a cliff, would you?"
I am reminded
of a story that, long ago, I used to tell to Japanese people whenever
I witnessed them doing something that I thought was strange.
The story went
like this: A man and woman married. The wife wanted to please her
new husband, so she cooked roast beef for him one night using an
old recipe she learned from her mother. When she was preparing the
meat, she sliced off both ends of the joint. The husband asked her
why she did that and she answered, "Because that’s how my mother
taught me to do it." Being a good husband, he left it at that
and told himself to ask his mother-in-law about it next time he
saw her.
That Christmas
the family got together and had roast beef. The wife’s mother came
for the dinner party and the husband remembered to ask her about
cutting off both ends of the joint. She gave the same answer as
her daughter: "It’s an old family recipe, and that’s how my
mother taught me to do it." Once again the husband’s curiosity
was piqued, and he told himself to ask his wife’s (still living)
grandmother about it, if he ever got the chance.
Soon after,
husband and wife were blessed with a baby boy. The entire family
was thrilled. Even grandmother made the cross-country trip to be
with her granddaughter when baby and mom came home.
For the occasion,
the wife’s mother (now a grandmother) decided to roast a joint of
beef for the dinner celebration. Now, with great-grandmother there,
the husband had his chance. He asked the old lady why, in the old
family recipe, the ends of the joint of beef were always cut off.
She replied, "In the old days, ovens were very small. The roast
wouldn’t fit inside of them if you didn’t cut the ends off."
All those years,
the ends were being cut off because that’s the way it had always
been done. No one stopped to question why.
In late 2003,
my wife and I were blessed with a baby boy. He is my fourth child
and my first son. In Asian countries, the first son holds a special
place in the family and in the psyche of the people. Soon after
his birth, I asked about circumcision. My wife’s doctor, who is
one of the most famous gynecologists in Japan, told me that circumcisions
are not performed in Japan. He didn’t know of any doctor in the
country who performed this operation. I was surprised. "Why?"
I thought. "No son of mine is going to be a freak!"
Time passed
and I decided that since the Japanese don’t do this operation, that
I would let it go and not have it performed on my son. I began to
wonder why it was that circumcisions were performed. What purpose
did they serve? I had heard that when babies are born, the operation
is simple and the boys (girls too) merely yelp and it’s over. But
if you wait until later, it can be excruciatingly painful.
Now, I find
some information about circumcision that raises my eyebrows. I read
an article that a friend sent to me. Some parts of it make really
good sense. It says:
"If
evolution put it there, its specialized design is one of evolution’s
finest inventions. If God put it there, he put it there for a
reason."
"There’s
a point past which no custom can be justified. The antiquity of
a tradition doesn’t make it right. Churches are obliged to adapt
to whatever degree of human rights are recognized in their vicinities.
Any faith whose adherents think they can only achieve spiritual
perfection by creating hell on earth for their kids, needs to
be curbed. Religious persecution is bad, but sexual mutilation
of babies and children is worse."
Well, I can’t
really find any fault with the reasoning here. I continue reading:
"To
rationalize that excising a portion of it prevents future problems,
is ridiculous. The arbitrary removal of a body part because something
might go wrong with it is insane.
"You
want to hear crazy? Some parents okay the operation because they
want Junior to look like Dad. Suppose the old man lost an arm
in battle or an industrial accident. Would they amputate the kid’s
arm so he’d match Dad? Some parents are afraid the boy will be
embarrassed if he’s not like his friends. Great logic: mess up
your kid so he’ll fit in with the other messed-up kids."
This entire
notion starts me thinking. Now, for the last few years, I’ve been
wondering what is going on with Americans and American society.
I’ve been wondering if there isn’t something in the water that’s
making people back in the States go bonkers. It can’t be mass hypnosis,
so what could it be? Then the friend who sent me the link to this
article writes this to me:
"… It
(circumcision) makes so many angry, frustrated people ... like
the Muslims, Americans and Israelis. Amazing, isn’t it? They are
the ONLY three cultures in the world that circumcise their young.
Only about 20 percent of the men in the world are c’d, but those
who were think it is "normal" and "natural"
and are usually surprised to find out that it’s not."
Okay.
Now I begin to exhale and realize that this is beginning to sound
like crazy talk. Yeah, that’s it. Crazy talk. He sounds like those
nutty conspiracy theorists. So I send the
article to another friend I trust who is a retired doctor. He
writes back to me:
"This
is an example of trying to justify an unnecessary procedure done
on #1 and his kids ... why not remove the appendix at birth as
a tiny percent will get appendicitis ... as a plastic surgeon
we would see the botched circumcisions that were done for NO good
reason other than maybe making a pediatrician’s boat payment ...
"Why
in hell do such an unnatural thing ... what next, cutting off
one earlobe at birth? It would be "no big deal – on infants.
"It
is a primitive racket whether done by a witch doctor, a man of
the cloth, or a money-hungry physician ..."
The alarm bells
go off. My retired doctor friend wrote the magic words that make
the confetti fall from the ceiling and I win a bunch of cash. Let’s
see here, he’s included all the red flags that I look for whenever
I am hunting for medical scams: "unnecessary procedures"
and "money-hungry physician" and "primitive racket"
and "pediatrician’s boat payment."
Come to think
of it, why do people have their sons and daughters circumcised?
What could the purpose possibly be? I don’t know. Perhaps for the
same reason that the ends were sliced off the beef before it was
put in the oven: That was the way it had always been done.
Having a circumcision
because "it" gets dirty makes no sense. I wash my two-year-old’s
"it" – under the skin – every night in the bath. I am
also teaching him to wash behind his ears and in his belly button.
No big deal. The so-called benefits of circumcision come from areas
of the world where hygiene is neglected. In northern Europe and
Japan (places with ready access to water and whose people practice
cleanliness) the racket never caught on, and they have none of the
horror stories about uncircumcised males.
Then the good
doctor sends me this
report from the British Journal of Surgery that says
circumcisions should not be performed unless there is a medical
reason for it:
"Circumcision
remains a common operation, with over 30,000 procedures performed
annually in the UK, mostly on children. The British Medical Association
has recommended that circumcision should be performed only for
medical reasons. Despite this, controversy exists over whether
too many circumcisions are being performed. Are patients being
exposed to an unnecessary operation? It may be argued that in
doubtful cases it is easier to proceed to circumcision on the
assumption that the risks are low, but the operation is associated
with a definite morbidity and rare deaths are reported. This review
considers the spectrum of complications what may result from circumcision
and discusses the possible aetiological mechanisms.
"Circumcision
is probably one of the oldest of all surgical procedures. Although
the origin of the practice is not entirely clear, it almost certainly
began as a religious rite. That it was practiced by the Egyptians
is evident as the earliest mummies were found to be circumcised.
In the Jewish community circumcision remains a religious ritual
and is usually performed on the child’s eighth day of life by
a Mohel. Religious circumcision is also practiced by Muslims;
the procedure is performed between the ages of 4 and 13 years.
Curiously the Koran contains no specific ordinance on this subject.
Currently approximately one-sixth of the world’s male population
is circumcised mostly on religious grounds. In Western society
circumcision is performed for medical reasons, the commonest of
which is phimosis. There is however, enormous variation between
the circumcision rate in the UK (56 per cent) and that in
the USA (8090 per cent). This large discrepancy exists despite
recommendations from both the British
Medical Association and the American
Association (sic) of Pediatricians that circumcision should
be performed only for medical reasons."
What? Well,
I don’t know about you, but this looks to me like people are endangering
their children and getting ripped off for a medical procedure that
they don’t need. You know, in the 1960s it was tonsillectomies.
Seeing as how my two-year-old is doing just fine, and as I’m surrounded
by tens of millions of Japanese guys who don’t seem to be having
too many problems (and seem to be much calmer than the average
American), I can see that I lucked out. My son will not be getting
a circumcision – a surgery that I thought he needed, but that I
never really asked myself about.
Could
circumcisions, as is reported in the above linked articles, be responsible
for cases of violent behavior and frustration? Could it lead to
depression, unhappiness, and all sorts of other problems? I don’t
know. I’m not a doctor. But I will say that I think now, after reading
this information, that it is an unnecessary procedure that can be
dangerous, costs money, and has no practical benefits in any society
that practices sanitation and has clean water.
If
I ever have another son, I will not allow him to be circumcised
either, until some doctor can give me logical reasons why he should.
I will also tell my friends not to have their children circumcised
until they’ve researched this and asked some awkward questions.
I want to know if having a circumcision can lead to medical or psychological
problems before I consider having one carried out on my child.
Could circumcisions
cause medical as well as psychological problems? Is this all just
psycho-babble from that Mike in Tokyo? You know, that schizo guy
in Japan? Perhaps so. I have suspected many times that Mike in Tokyo
is crazy.
After all,
he was circumcised as a baby.
Edited
by Jeremy Irwin
March
3, 2006
Mike
(in Tokyo) Rogers [send
him mail] was born and raised in the USA and moved to Japan
in 1984. He is the president of a mass-media production company
and also runs a talent agency in Japan. His first book, Schizophrenic
in Japan, is now on sale.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Mike
(in Tokyo) Rogers Archives
|