Do
Greedy Spinach Merchants Want To Kill You?
by
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
DIGG THIS
Last month,
news of an E. coli infection that originated in a bag of fresh spinach
packaged by Natural Selections Foods, kicked off a nationwide frenzy.
More than 180 people became sick from eating spinach, 97 of whom
were hospitalized. One person died. The company in question is in
total meltdown, and growers around the country are redoubling their
efforts to make sure that every leaf is clean and pure.
At the first
notice of problems, five different companies immediately announced
a recall, as did merchants around the country. Baggers started shipping
salad with greens other than spinach. Grocery stores immediately
switched vendors. Once it became clear that Natural Selection of
Northern California was the culprit, distributors started making
contracts with Southern California and Canadian companies. Consumers
stayed away in droves, and parents around the country did an about-face
on their opinions of spinach.
This is one
of the benefits of the information age, when word gets out to hundreds
of millions in a matter of minutes. The response was a marvel of
how markets can work. A valuable product said to bring health suddenly
becomes a source of sickness and within hours, people not only stop
eating it; it isn't even available for purchase! Compare the response
time with the way governments at all levels responded to Katrina,
for example.
The story might
have ended there, as the groceries isolated the source of the problem
and the baggers turned their attention to the farmers and the farmers
looked more carefully into the irrigation and fertilizer sources
and otherwise sought to fix the problem. And why wouldn't they?
They are all in business to make money. You can only make money
by selling things that people want, and this much is absolutely
certain: people don't want spinach that makes them sick.
But then, and
inevitably, the government got involved. The FDA echo chamber started
issuing recalls. Then, incredibly, the FBI got involved, as if we
were talking about thugs and criminals and terrorists rather than
bad soil or a mistake at the company. Criminal prosecutors began
giving ominous warnings about how "certain spinach growers and distributors
may not have taken all necessary or appropriate steps to ensure
their spinach was safe."
Then the search
warrants came. The FBI said "we're definitely looking into the possibility
that there was a criminal violation of federal environmental laws"
that took place. So you can go to the FBI site and see news of how
they are arresting people for supporting terrorists, hunting down
the nation's most wanted cop killers, breaking up violent gangs,
hunting down art thieves, and also muscling spinach baggers.
Has the government
never heard of the difference between civil and criminal law? To
place this in the category of criminal law means that instead of
fines and reimbursements or, at worst, punitive damage payments
in the case of negligence, the people being investigated are implicitly
threatened with jail and other forms of violence. Doesn't it seem
that the bureaucratic class is drawn to the latter forms of enforcement?
For this to
be a criminal case implies that the grocers, baggers, or farmers
involved in this problem are seeking to harm people through nefarious
tactics, or otherwise seeking to profit by making people sick. This
is ridiculous. Also ridiculous is the idea that the FDA and the
FBI need to be involved in regulating and punishing people in business
for failing to serve the interests of consumers.
The truth is
that the people who buy and sell are far more interested in the
well being of the public than lifetime bureaucrats who have no professional
stake in the outcome of the enterprising process than the man in
the moon. Their one and only interest is protecting their power
and position. Increasingly, they seize on any and every headline
to whip up public frenzy.
This is government
in the Bush age, in which every turn of events becomes a matter
for federal goon squads to crack skulls. People often claim that
the government used 9/11 as an excuse to do what they wanted to
do in any case, which was to trample on the Constitution's protections
against violations of our personal liberty. Not only is that true;
the government is now using even the smallest and most petty excuses
to do the same.
But you might
say: at what cost? What is the big deal as to whether the FDA and
the FBI are involved in the great spinach case or not? Surely the
only result will be that merchants will become more careful about
guarding the health of consumers.
Actually, I
don't think that is a foregone conclusion. Many more people die
per day on government highways than became sick in this spinach
scare, and I see no hysteria to prosecute road builders or bureaucrats
at the Transportation Department. Far from protecting people, the
government has a special skill associated with perpetually endangering
people such as American soldiers in hostile foreign lands, not to
speak of civilians. It is not at all obvious that government has
the interests of our health at heart when it regulates and controls
us.
There is also
an ideological cost here. Whenever government demonizes merchants,
it encourages the view that we must be forever on the lookout for
dishonest business people who are seeking to make us sick, and from
whom only the great civil servants in government can protect us.
These
sorts of investigations actually encourage the view that free enterprise
is a source of danger and a health hazard rather than our source
of service and health enhancement. After all, a century ago, people
would have found it to be nothing short of a miracle that greens
could survive a cross-country trek and land on your dining table
in pretty much the same state as when they were picked.
There
is also a cost to freedom itself. We are being conditioned to believe
that for every problem, there is a government answer, and nothing
lies outside its purview and expertise. Even mild cases of food
poisoning merit a nationwide investigation and crackdown on bad
guys, who, we are encouraged to believe, are always in the private
sector and never in the public sector. Well, when it comes to the
choice between a totalitarian state and the possibility of some
rotten spinach, I'll take the latter.
October
6, 2006
Llewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr. [send him
mail] is president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, editor of LewRockwell.com,
and author of Speaking
of Liberty.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Lew
Rockwell Archives
|