The
Ghoul in Your Tank
by
Llewellyn H. Rockwell,
Jr.
Welcome
to June 2000, the month in which new federal gasoline regulations
have come into effect for a third of the country. The mandate that
some cities sell reformulated gasoline (RFG) caused market supplies
to drop, just at the time when gasoline demand increased for summer
travel.
No
surprise, gas prices soared to over $2 a gallon in Chicago, where
the new regs hit the hardest. Everywhere, prices are reaching above
the $1.65 range, a post-Gulf War high. It’s the government’s way
of making sure that this summertime, the livin’ won’t be easy.
During
the winter months the Clinton administration worried more intensely
about the high price of oil. A few months back, when prices were
last spiraling upward, there was some concern about low-income families
in the Northeast not being able to heat their homes. Gas prices
also took a jump so Congress began talking about repealing Clinton’s
4.3 cents tax on gasoline.
But
fortunately for the White House, super-cold weather never materialized,
so all talk of reducing artificially inflated prices by any means
ceased. More decisively, someone told the Republicans that repealing
the Clinton gas tax would mean that Congress would have less money
to spend. They thought about that, and quickly changed their minds.
But
now that summer is here, and oil prices are up again, there’s no
more concern about poor people shivering their way through winter;
in summer, the only people harmed are middle-class vacationers driving
gas-guzzlers archetypical real Americans and who cares
about them?
And
yet, consumers want answers and the government is glad to give them,
even when it means telling outrageous lies. "We think the prices
that are being charged are unfair and inappropriate," Robert
Perciasepe, an assistant EPA administrator, told the press, just
before summoning oil producers before the DC Politburo.
We
know that no institution is in a better position to discover and
punish unfair and inappropriate behavior than the Clinton administration.
You merely compare the cost of production of gas to its price. If
there’s a problem, you conclude, as has the monstrous Energy Secretary
Bill Richardson, that there’s something wrong with the market. In
the tradition of "when did you stop beating your wife,"
he said in a CNN interview: "Is it collusion or is it price
gouging? We need answers to those questions."
Here’s
your answer, buddy: it’s the misnamed Energy Department! (And permit
me a small technical point about the relationship between cost and
price: accounting costs are historical data, while prices always
reflect present forecasts of the future that may or may not be right.
There is no fixed relationship between the two in the real world.)
It’s
all very nice and easy to pick on the working-class folks who go
to the trouble of extracting the oil, turning it into gasoline,
and delivering it to your neighborhood station for you to buy. When
you are looking for someone to blame in these times, it’s always
easiest to blast the businessman. No calumny, no matter how implausible,
is too far-fetched to pin on capitalism. The press plays along,
with most reporters failing even to mention the new regulatory mandates,
or any of the other impositions that are driving prices sky-high.
Actually,
when you consider all the government conspiracy to drive gas prices
up, it’s a wonder and a credit to free enterprise that they are
not up to $5 a gallon by now. Most importantly, there are the taxes,
which today account for at least 32 percent of the pump price of
gasoline. According to the American Petroleum Institute, gasoline
taxes average over 41 cents per gallon. Gas taxes zoomed 100% in
the 1980s, and 54% in the 1990s.
Oil
producers today are treated very poorly by the government. Besides
being among the most heavily regulated sectors, a percentage of
all revenue from oil produced on socialized land must be forked
over to the federal government in the form of royalty payments.
And the Clinton administration is trying to make that payment more
egregious by increasing it without regard to the terms of the leasing
contract.
This
policy is consistent with the restrictions put on drilling and leasing.
The US is home to rich oil lands in Alaska and offshore, to which
oil producers are denied access. The excuse is the environment,
but that can’t be the real reason; oil producers long ago learned
to make themselves virtually invisible as they work to put nature
to man’s use. For the government, high prices are their own reward.
Senate
Majority leader Trent Lott says he will push for legislation to
open up some lands in Alaska for drilling. He might even send out
a few fundraising letters on the subject. But we know how this will
end. He’ll shmooze with a friends-of-the-earth-type lobbyist and
table the whole idea in a few weeks’ time. Why do they tease us
so? And why do we pretend to go along?
The
protectionist menace is also a factor in high gas prices, and here
is where the Republicans are really bad. It’s been ten years since
the Gulf War and trade with Iraq is still seriously restricted.
Opening full trading relations would not only break the back of
OPEC; it would immediately unleash millions of barrels of oil and
cause prices to plummet. But for all the talk about the merits of
free trade, this is not even being considered.
Repealing
any one of these interventions would bring prices down to less than
a $1. But what if we repealed all of them? What if taxes were wiped
out, crazy regulations repealed, oil lands opened up, and free trade
established with Iraq? Gas would be plentiful. What the price would
be-75 cents? 25 cents? would be anyone’s guess. Many refineries
would go out of business, of course, but new ones would pop up.
The market economy would find the right price for gasoline and we’d
never worry again about the high price of gas.
But
the Clinton administration, and the greens behind all these bad
policies, have a different idea in mind. Their model, for now, is
Germany, where an "ecology" tax has driven the price of
gasoline to $3.85 per gallon. No more joy rides and traveler freedom.
Just taking a Sunday drive means spending a week’s earnings. And
the citizens are in a fury over it, with 60 percent of those polled
demanding a repeal of the tax.
What
are the effects of policies designed to deliberately drive up the
price of gas? Everything that involves transportation has gone up
in Germany. Not just air fares, but also the price charged for school
trips, locksmith visits, and rent-a-cars. Even the price of having
a pizza delivered is up by 25 to 50 cents. Drivers are struggling
to provide consumers a great perk of the capitalist economy: having
a pizza delivered to your door.
It’s
crucial to remember that these are not side effects or unintended
consequences of bad policy. A high price for gas is the policy.
Less driving and less consumption generally is the goal. The real
ideal is Mao’s China, where the entire population crowded the streets
with bicycles and gasoline powered only public transportation, the
bureaucracy, and the military to enforce the edicts of the commissars.
The left reminisces over these scenes and thinks: look at the wondrous
conservation of resources that communism made possible.
Toward
Germany and Mao’s China is where the Clinton administration would
like to take us. The response might be: well, it hasn’t killed Europe
and US prices are still cheap by international standards. But there’s
a huge difference. With the vast amount of space in this country,
efficient travel is essential to prosperity and a high quality of
life. But try to explain that to ghouls who have deliberately brought
about high prices and then lied about it.
June
16, 2000
Llewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr., is president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. He
also edits a daily news site, LewRockwell.com.
|