Capitalist
Revolt in France!
by
Llewellyn H. Rockwell,
Jr.
The
old-time caché of "public service" that
is, running other people’s lives at taxpayer expense as a bureaucrat
for the government is taking a beating in France. A new generation
is coming to see that "public service" is not a high calling
at all, but a very low one.
For
example, applications to France’s most prestigious public educational
institution, the National School of Administration, or the ENA,
have plummeted 30 percent in the last four years. And though its
graduates are guaranteed high-level lifetime jobs working for the
government, many recent alumni are choosing private-sector careers
working for capitalist ventures where the money and the real social
prestige can be found.
This
is an incredible trend considering the national context. Government
work has been out of favor among average people for decades in the
US, and it slides further by the day. But in France, the power and
prestige of state management of society has maintained an implacable
grip all through the 1980s and 1990s. Even after the fall of socialism,
the intellectual climate remained so left-wing that any book or
article calling into question the glorious legacy of communism was
greeted with shock and horror by the intellectual elite.
Until
recently, every smart French student dreamed of attending the ENA,
an educational citadel of government planning founded by Charles
DeGaulle after World War II. His goal was to create an institution
that would attract the top-performing students in all of France
to be trained in social and economic engineering to manage the peace
the way they had managed the war.
The
entrance exams were legendarily difficult, and acceptance rates
ran 1 in 200. Its graduates have ruled France with an iron fist,
enforcing high taxes and the 35-hour workweek, doling out welfare
benefits to all takers, restricting competition with rigorously
tight regulations, and administering its nationalized industries.
What
a waste! The ENA drained France of some of its best thinkers and
put them to work doing destructive instead of productive jobs, and
the result has been a decades-old economic stagnation that hasn’t
mitigated until very recently. This form of brain-drain has caused
a dead-weight loss all over the Western world since the end of World
War II, but the effect has been huge in France. A sure sign of change,
reports Suzanne Daley in the New York Times, is that ENA
graduates, because of their high IQ combined with real-world ignorance,
have even become the butt of jokes like this one:
A
young man stops by a herd of sheep and bets the farmer that he
can count them at a glance. If he is correct, he says, he gets
to take one. The young man guesses right, and grabs his prize.
The farmer then offers a counter-bet that if he can guess the
young man’s alma mater, the animal stays. The young man agrees,
and the farmer correctly guesses the ENA. How did he know, the
young man demands? "Because," answers the farmer, "that
is my dog you have under your arm."
Jokes
at the expense of bureaucrats are a staple of the US, but to see
it in France, where the administrative state has been so deeply
entrenched, indicates that the decline of the state is affecting
the entire developed world. The bureaucratic apparatus can no longer
even pretend to keep up with the technological innovations, efficiencies,
and pay scales of the private sector. As a result, it is losing
people and resources to the capitalist economy.
And
yet these factors alone are not enough to enact a revolution against
the ancien régime. What is also needed is a dramatic intellectual
change as well. This is particularly difficult to imagine in a country
where the educational system is controlled from top to bottom by
left-wing ideologues and would-be social and economic planners of
all sorts.
But
somehow in the midst of this rubble there has emerged a champion
of freedom who, in his command of intellectual history and understanding
of the present state of the world, can run circles around France’s
intellectual elites. His name is Pascal Salin, a professor of economics
at the University of Paris, Dauphine. He is the author of a 500-page
treatise on political economy that can be found in most of France’s
good bookstores. The name of the book is Liberalisme (Paris:
Editions Odile Jacob, 2000). The title refers not to modern liberalism
but to classical liberalism, the political ideal of freedom and
the rule of law.
Essentially,
Salin’s book is a restatement and re-application of the worldview
of Frederic Bastiat, the old French liberal who so effectively debunked
every form of statism in the 19th century, and earned
the scorn of a century of social planners afterward. Salin shows
that the tradition he represents is exactly right, that the state
leaves nothing but destruction in its wake, and that the energy
and development of a social order relies wholly on the liberty and
creativity of individuals and their private associations.
This
is a message that resonates very strongly with a new generation
of French students who are fed up with the failures of the administrative
state. Indeed, in an interview
with Mises.org, Salin noticed the trends at the ENA before the
New York Times got around to reporting them:
"I
have recently spoken to some professors who have confided that the
best students in France no longer want to go there to study. This
is a very good sign. It suggests that the social prestige of the
state is beginning to decline. There are several factors that help
explain why. First, there is the daily news of corruption in government.
It is overwhelming. And after a while, that begins to take a toll
on the status of public service generally. People are deeply disappointed
with politics."
Second,
"there is the changing economic environment that encourages
bright young people to pursue careers in film, technology, and industry.
The young understand the new technologies, so they are paid a premium
for private-sector work."
His
third reason: the European Union, which Salin has opposed as bureaucratic
and centralist, at least has the good effect of weakening the bonds
of the French youth to their own central government and drawing
their attention to economic and political developments in other
countries.
At
the same time, Salin warns that as young people continue to lose
faith in the system, the bureaucrats and their media counterparts
are becoming more vehement in their defense of the old order. Allied
with them are the economic nationalist elements who think that burning
down a McDonald’s is an acceptable "nonviolent" protest
against the rise of international capitalism in France.
The
battle between the forces of genuine liberalism and the centralized
administrative state is far from over. But there’s a new generation
being raised to see the benefits of capitalism and striving to join
the productive classes, and a new generation of intellectuals following
Pascal Salin instead of the drones at the ENA. In the future, will
the state become an abandoned shell, drained by the private sector
of all intellectual resources? We may only see the barest outlines
of this vision now, but it is beautiful to behold.
July
11, 2000
Llewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr., is president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. He
also edits a daily news site, LewRockwell.com.
Lew
Rockwell Archives
|