Fed
Attack
by
Llewellyn H. Rockwell,
Jr.
Oh
for the days of yesteryear, when everyone believed Alan Greenspan
was the master of the universe. Sitting in his high-backed leather
chair, surrounded by the million levers of the machine called monetary
policy, he could steer the domestic and international economy with
precision. His every word, every breath, caused markets and currencies
to rise and fall. Surely without him and his legendary intellectual
power all would be lost.
You
know what? It was all hooey. The Fed chairman has only one power:
to create or destroy money. Even that power is limited by the behavior
of the markets themselves. If the demand for money and loans isn’t
there, cutting the federal funds rate doesn’t do the trick. He can
buy and sell government bonds, but that is dangerous business because
too many bonds purchased in the open market can cause the dollar
to fall and price inflation to rise.
In
the end, Greenspan has lots of power to create havoc, and very little
to do good. In fact, the best path he can take toward doing good
is to do nothing, which is very much against his grain. We learned
that during the Mexico crisis, and again during the Asian crisis.
We have learned that yet again hoo boy have we learned during the
weeks that followed the September 11 attacks.
Just
look at the numbers, using the broad measure of money employed by
the St. Louis Fed (MZM, or money of zero maturity). Before the attack,
money was soaring at 10 percent growth annualized. After, it spiked
to 15 percent and above (we’ll know more when all the data have
been accumulated). We may look at back at the end of the year and
see money creation closer to 20 percent. And is there anyone that
the Fed hasn’t promised to bail out?
Many
of us worried that the US would someday go the way of Japan, toward
permanent recession combined with a central bank just begging people
to borrow. The Japanese central bank recently lowered its rates
again from 0.15 to 0.1, and not a soul believes it will do a thing
to spur productivity. Knowing from history that history teaches
central bankers nothing, many people knew that there but for the
grace of God would go Greenspan.
And
Greenspan has gone that way. Rates are now down to 2.5 percent.
2.5 percent! That’s the lowest in 40 years. Real savings are nil.
What people thought were savings stock accounts are losing value
by the day.
Still,
some people ask: why does Greenspan keep rates so high? Why indeed?
Why not bring them down to Japan-style levels of 0.1 percent? In
fact, why not abolish interest altogether and reinstitute the vision
of assorted lunatics who believed interest to be immoral "usury"?
Here’s
why. Please memorize this answer: Printing money does not create
prosperity. In fact, it doesn’t produce any net social benefit.
It only redistributes wealth, making each individual unit worth
less and less and rewarding only those who receive the newly created
money before the purchasing power of everyone else’s goes down.
Interest rates are the price we pay for living in a world of scarcity.
If
you think about it, it’s a nutty idea that printing money can create
prosperity. If that’s all there was to it, all issues in economics
would have long ago been rendered irrelevant. Society would have
been wealthy and productive for the last 3,000 years. But long ago,
someone caught on that alchemy is nothing but black magic, and that
counterfeiting even when done by the government is actually a crime,
not a social service.
Tell
that to the Fed, which still doesn’t seem to understand that productivity
is a consequence of saving (a word so rarely used that it probably
won’t appear in the next Webster’s) and investment (real investment,
not IPO manias). It requires sacrifice of present consumption and
entrepreneurship on the free market.
But
isn’t new money essential at a time when the economy is weak? Quite
the opposite. The reason the economy is weak is due to the preceding
economic boom, which was all out of proportion to its fundamental
justification in savings. The madness of the late 1990s was itself
a result of monetary pumping by the Federal Reserve. The thing to
do is allow the correction to occur so we can be on a solid footing
for the future.
But
the Fed has become so convinced that it is the Magical Prosperity
Machine that it refused to let the recession happen. Once on that
course, nothing could deter these people and their printing presses.
Even a terror attack that destroyed the World Trade Towers wasn’t
enough to bring these people back to reality. It only provided another
rationale for doing what they already wanted to do, which was flood
the economy with money.
One
analyst said: "The Fed can almost do no wrong by lowering short
term interest rates now." Think again. It can forestall recovery
by putting off an inevitable recession. It can chip away at the
purchasing power of money. It can reduce the value of the dollar
internationally. It can prop up businesses that should fail. It
can spur investments that shouldn’t exist. It can promote borrowing
that no one can afford, setting people and whole sectors up for
bankruptcy. It can even create hyperinflation. In short, it can
ruin the economy and all those who work in it.
Not
bad for two weeks’ work. As Mel Brooks might say, it’s good to be
the Fed.
October
5, 2001
Llewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr. [send
him mail], is president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama.
Copyright
© 2001 LewRockwell.com
Lew
Rockwell Archives
|