It's
the 1930s All Over Again
by
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
DIGG THIS
Jittery stock
markets, an economy drunk on credit, and politicians calling for
varieties of dictatorship: what a sense of déjà vu!
Let us recall that the world went bonkers for about ten years way
back when. The stock market crashed in 1929, thanks to the Federal
Reserve, and with it fell the last remnants of the old liberal ideology
that government should leave society and economy alone to flourish.
After the federal Great Depression hit, there was a general air
in the United States and Europe that freedom hadn't worked. What
we needed were strong leaders to manage and plan economies and societies.
And how they
were worshipped. On the other side of the world, there were Stalin
and Hitler and Mussolini, but in the United States we weren't in
very good shape either. Here we had FDR, who imagined himself capable
of astonishing feats of price setting and economy boosting. Of course
he used old-fashioned tricks: printing money and threatening people
with guns. It was nothing but the ancient despotism brought back
in pseudo-scientific garb.
Things didn't
really return to normal until after the war. These "great men" of
history keeled over eventually, but look what they left: welfare
states, inflationary banking systems, high taxes, massive debt,
mandates on business, and regimes with a penchant for meddling at
the slightest sign of trouble. They had their way even if their
absurd posturing became unfashionable later.
It's strange
to go back and read opinion pieces from those times. It's as if
everyone just assumed that we had to have either fascism or socialism,
and that the one option to be ruled out was laissez-faire. People
like Mises and Hayek had to fight tooth and nail to get a hearing.
The Americans had some journalists who seemed to understand, but
they were few and far between.
So what was
the excuse for such a shabby period in ideological history? Why
did the world go crazy? It was the Great Depression, or so says
the usual explanation. People were suffering and looking for answers.
They turned to a Strongman to bail them out. There was a fashion
for scientific planning, and the suffering economy (caused by the
government, of course) seemed to bolster the rationale.
All of which
brings me to a strange observation: when it comes to politics, we
aren't that much better off today. It's true that we don't have
people running for office in ridiculous military suits. They don't
scream at us or give sappy fireside chats or purport to be the embodiment
of the social mind. The tune is slightly changed, but the notes
and rhythms are the same.
Have you listened
carefully to what the Democrats are proposing in the lead-up to
the presidential election? It's just about as disgusting as anything
heard in the 1930s: endless government programs to solve all human
ills. It's as if they can't think in any other way, as if their
whole worldview would collapse if they took notice of the fact that
government can't do anything right.
But it also
seems like they are living on another planet. The stock market has
a long way to fall before it reaches anything we could call low.
Mortgage interest rates are creeping along at the lowest possible
rates. Unemployment is close to 4%, which is lower than even Keynesians
of old could imagine in their wildest dreams.
The private
sector is creating a miracle a day, even as the stuff that government
attempts is failing left and right. The bureaucracies are as wasteful
and useless as they've ever been, spending is already insanely high,
debt is skyrocketing, and there's no way that any American believes
himself to be under-taxed.
The Democrats,
meanwhile, go about their merry business as if the public schools
were a model for all of society. Oh, and let us not forget their
brilliant idea of shutting down the industrial economy and human
prosperity so the government can plan the weather 100 years from
now. We can only hope that there are enough serious people left
to put a stop to this harebrained idea.
But before
we get carried away about the Democrats, let's say a few words about
the bloodthirsty Republicans, who think of war not as something
to regret, but rather the very moral life of the nation. For them,
justice equals Guantánamo Bay, and public policy means a new war
every month, and vast subsidies to the military-industrial complex
and such other Republican-friendly firms as the big pharmaceutical
companies. Sure, they pay lip service to free enterprise, but it's
just a slogan to them, unleashed whenever they fear that they are
losing support among the bourgeois merchant class.
So there we
have it. Our times are good, and yet we face a choice between two
forms of central planning. They are varieties of socialism and fascism,
but not overtly: they disguise their ideological convictions so
that we won't recognize that they and their ilk have certain predecessors
in the history of political economy.
Into
this mix steps Ron Paul, with a message that has stunned millions.
He says again and again that government is not the way out. And
even though his political life is nothing short of heroic, he doesn't
believe that his candidacy is about him and his personal ambitions.
He talks of Bastiat, Hazlitt, Mises, Hayek, and Rothbard – in public
campaign speeches. And let no one believe that this is just rhetoric.
Take a look at his voting record if you doubt it. Even the New
York Times is amazed to discover that there is a principled
man in politics.
It is impressive
how crowds are hard pressed to disagree with him. How much good
is he doing? It is impossible to exaggerate it. He provides hope
when we need it most. You see, the American economy may look good
on the surface but underneath, the foundation is cracking. The debt
is unsustainable. Savings are nearly nonexistent. Money supply creation
is getting scary. The paper-money economy can't last and won’t last.
One senses that the slightest change could cause unforeseen wreckage.
What
would happen should the bottom fall out? Scary thought. We need
ever more public spokesmen for our cause. In many ways, the Mises
Institute bears a heavy burden as the world's leading institutional
voice for peace and economic liberty. So does LewRockwell.com. And
we are working in every way possible to make sure that the flame
of freedom is not extinguished, even in the face of legions of charlatans
and power-mongers. Even though the politics of our times is as dark
as ever, there are bright lights on the horizon.
July
28, 2007
Llewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr. [send him
mail] is president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, editor of LewRockwell.com,
and author of Speaking
of Liberty.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Lew
Rockwell Archives
|