America’s
Police Brutality Pandemic
by
Paul Craig Roberts
by Paul Craig Roberts
DIGG THIS
Bush’s "war
on terror" quickly became Bush’s war on Iraqi civilians. So
far over one million Iraqi civilians have lost their lives because
of Bush’s invasion, and four million have been displaced. Iraq’s
infrastructure is in ruins. Disease is rampart. Normal life has
disappeared.
Self-righteous
Americans justify these monstrous crimes as necessary to ensure
their own safety from terrorist attack. Yet, Americans are in far
greater danger from their own police forces than they are from foreign
terrorists. Ironically, Bush’s "war on terror" has made
Americans less safe at home by diminishing US civil liberty and
turning an epidemic of US police brutality into a pandemic.
The only terrorist
most Americans will ever encounter is a policeman with a badge,
nightstick, mace and Taser. A Google search for "police brutality
videos" turns up 2,210,000 entries. Some entries are foreign
and some are probably duplications, but the number is so large that
a person could do nothing but watch police brutality videos for
the rest of his life. A search on "You Tube" alone turned
up 2,280 police brutality videos. PrisonPlanet
has a selection of the most outrageous recent cases.
Police brutality
has crossed the line from using excessive force against a resisting
Rodney King to unprovoked gratuitous violence against persons offering
no resistance, such as the elderly, women, students, and elected
officials. Americans are not safe anywhere from police. Police
attack Americans in university libraries, in public meetings, and
in their own homes.
Last week
we had the case of the University of Florida student who was repeatedly
Tasered without cause for asking Senator Kerry some good questions
in the question and answer period following Kerry’s speech. Two
days after the Florida student was gratuitously brutalized, Senate
Republicans defeated Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy’s bill to restore
habeas corpus protection.
A UCLA student
was Tasered by police without cause for studying in the university
library without having his student ID on his person. Following police
orders to leave, the student was walking toward the door when police
grabbed him and repeatedly Tasered him.
On September
19, 2007 a young woman was repeatedly Tasered without cause by a
large brutal cop in a parking lot outside a night club in Warren
Ohio.
On September
14, 2007, Roseland, Indiana, city council member David Snyder was
ejected from a council meeting by dictatorial council chairman Charlie
Shields. Snyder had protested being limited to one minute to speak.
Police goon Jack Tiller escorted Snyder out, and as Snyder exited
the building, Tiller, following behind, pushed Snyder to the ground
and without cause began beating Snyder in the head with a nightstick.
Snyder was hospitalized.
Local TV news
stations throughout the US offer an endless stream of police brutality
videos, which are then posted on the stations’ web sites, often
with an opportunity for citizens to express their opinion of the
incidents.
There are many
disturbing aspects to police brutality cases.
One disturbing
aspect is that the police always arrest the people that they have
gratuitously brutalized. There was no justification whatsoever to
arrest councilman Snyder, or the UCLA student, or the University
of Florida student. The cops committed assault against innocent
citizens. The cops should have been arrested for their criminal
acts. Instead, the cops cover up their own crimes by arresting their
victims on false charges that are invented to justify the unprovoked
police violence against citizens.
Another disturbing
aspect is that no one tells the police to stop the brutality. "Free"
Americans are so intimidated by police that on
February 19 of this year male customers in a Chicago bar stood
aside while a drunk cop weighing 251 pounds beat a 115 pound barmaid,
knocking her to the floor with his fists and repeatedly kicking
her, for obeying the bar rules and not serving him more drinks.
Yet another
disturbing aspect is that a minority of citizens will justify each
act of police brutality no matter how brutal and how unprovoked.
For example, WNDU.com’s poll of its viewers found that 64.2% agreed
that Snyder was a victim of police brutality, but 27.8% thought
that Snyder got what was coming to him. "Law and order conservatives"
and other authoritarian personalities invariably defend acts of
police brutality. Perhaps the police brutality pandemic will bring
the day when we will be able to say that a civil libertarian is
a law and order conservative who has been brutalized by police.
The most disturbing
aspect is that the police usually get away with it.
I remember
decades ago when civil libertarians in New York City tried to stop
police brutality by establishing civilian review boards to introduce
some accountability into the police’s interaction with civilians.
Law and order conservatives at William F. Buckley’s National Review
went berserk. Accountability was "second-guessing" the
police. The result would be a crime wave. And so on.
Police forces
have always attracted bullies with authoritative personalities who
desire to beat senseless anyone who does not quake in their presence.
In the past police could get away with brutalizing blacks but not
whites. Today white citizens are as likely as racial minorities
to be victims of police brutality.
The police
are supreme. The militarization of the police, armed now with military
weapons and trained to view the general public as the enemy, against
whom "pain compliance" must be used, has placed every
American at risk of personal injury and false arrest from our "public
protectors."
In "free
and democratic America," citizens are in such great danger
from police that there are websites devoted to police brutality
with online forms to report the brutality.
Nine years
ago Human Rights Watch published a report entitled, "Shielded
from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United
States." The report stated:
"Police
abuse remains one of the most serious and divisive human rights
violations in the United States. The excessive use of force by police
officers, including unjustified shootings, severe beatings, fatal
chokings, and rough treatment, persists because overwhelming barriers
to accountability make it possible for officers who commit human
rights violations to escape due punishment and often to repeat their
offenses. Police or public officials greet each new report of brutality
with denials or explain that the act was an aberration, while the
administrative and criminal systems that should deter these abuses
by holding officers accountable instead virtually guarantee them
impunity.
"This
report examines common obstacles to accountability for police abuse
in fourteen large cities representing most regions of the nation.
The cities examined are: Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Indianapolis,
Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New Orleans, New York, Philadelphia, Portland,
Providence, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Research for this
report was conducted over two and a half years, from late 1995 through
early 1998.
"The brutality
cases examined, which are set out in detail in chapters on each
city, are similar to cases that continue to emerge in headlines
and in survivors' complaints. It is important to note, however,
that because it is difficult to obtain case information except where
there is public scandal and/or prosecution, this report relies heavily
on cases that have reached public attention; disciplinary action
and criminal prosecution are even less common than the
cases set out below would suggest.
There is no
way to hold police accountable when the president and vice president
of the United States, the attorney general, and the Republican Party
maintain that the civil liberties and the separation of powers mandated
by the US
Constitution must be abandoned in order that the executive branch
can keep Americans safe from terrorists.
Even before
the "war on terror," federal
police murdered 100 people in the Branch Davidian compound at Waco,
and no one was held accountable.
Who is a terrorist?
If the police and the US government have the mentality of airport
security, they cannot tell a terrorist from an 86-year old Marine
general on his way to give a speech at West Point. Retired Marine
Corps General Joseph J. Foss was delayed and nearly had his Medal
of Honor confiscated. Airport security regarded the pin on the metal
as a weapon that the 86-year old Marine general and former governor
of South Dakota could use to hijack an airliner and commit a terrorist
deed.
In
America today, every citizen is a potential terrorist in the eyes
of the authorities. Airport security makes this clear every minute
of every day, as do the FBI and NSA with warrantless spying on our
emails, postal mail, telephone calls, and every possible invasion
of our privacy. We are all recipients of abuse of our constitutional
rights whether or not we suffer beatings, Taserings, and false arrests.
The
law makes it impossible for Americans to defend themselves from
police brutality. Law and order conservatives have made it a felony
with a long prison sentence to "assault a police officer."
Assaulting a police officer means that if a police thug intends
to beat your brains out with his nightstick and you disarm your
assailant, you have "assaulted a police officer." If you
are not shot on the spot by his backup, you will be convicted by
a "law and order" jury and sent to prison.
No matter how
gratuitous and violent the police brutality, a "free"
American citizen can defend himself only at the expense, if not
of his life, of a long stay in prison. Osama bin Laden must wish
that he had such power over Americans.
September
26, 2007
Paul
Craig Roberts [send
him mail] wrote the Kemp-Roth bill and was Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor
of the Wall
Street Journal
editorial page and Contributing Editor of National
Review. He
is author or coauthor of eight books, including The
Supply-Side Revolution
(Harvard University Press). He has held numerous academic appointments,
including the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy, Center
for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University and
Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
He has contributed to numerous scholarly journals and testified
before Congress on 30 occasions. He has been awarded the U.S. Treasury's
Meritorious Service Award and the French Legion of Honor. He was
a reviewer for the Journal
of Political Economy
under editor Robert Mundell. He
is the co-author of The
Tyranny of Good Intentions.
He is also coauthor with Karen Araujo of Chile: Dos Visiones
– La Era Allende-Pinochet (Santiago: Universidad Andres Bello,
2000).
Copyright
© 2007 Creators Syndicate
Paul
Craig Roberts Archives
|