The Republican War
by
Charley
Reese
by Charley Reese
DIGG THIS
It is now
clear that the proper name for the war going on in Mesopotamia is
the "Republican War." Never before has a political party
so decisively asserted ownership of a foreign war.
The Republicans
refuse to share it with the Democrats, who, despite their many resolutions,
have yet to call for a complete withdrawal of American forces. Democrats
have not come close to proposing to cut off the war funding, which
is the only way the war can be ended.
Yet Republicans
act like jealous suitors and seem to want to keep the war as their
very own. They have killed every single proposal to alter the strategy
or the tactics. They even killed a bill that would have done nothing
more than guarantee that American soldiers would get a rest period
at home equal to the time spent in the war.
Killing that
bill, which had nothing to do with withdrawal or timetables for
withdrawal, clearly proves that Republicans do not support the troops.
They support the war. There is a huge difference. Little Lindsey
Graham, the Republican senator from South Carolina, has become so
possessive of the war that he seems on the edge of hysteria.
He seems frightened
to death of what will happen when Americans leave. In fact, nothing
much will happen except that Iraqis will concentrate on killing
each other rather than killing Americans and each other. Most normal
people would consider that a positive development for us.
The Republicans
and their shrinking number of warmonger supporters have long since
forgotten that the Republican War is an illegal war, a war of aggression
launched against a country that had not attacked us or ever threatened
to attack us. They have conveniently forgotten how the Republican
War was sold to the American people with outright lies. They ignore
the fact that the war was bungled from Day One and that ordinary
Americans have paid a terrible price for those blunders.
If ever there
were a valid reason to shed the label "Republican," the
nutty administration and its war-loving allies in the House and
Senate have provided it. They seem to have lost their collective
minds. They know darn well what their general du jour, David Petraeus,
is going to say in September: "Gosh, fellows, things are looking
up, but give us another five years. Or maybe 10."
That would
be insanity to the third power. The Iraqis are killing us on the
cheap with secondhand AK-47s, rifle grenades and homemade bombs
created out of old artillery shells. We are using the most expensive
weapons in the world, wielded by the most expensive army in the
world, to kill them by the small handful. I don't know what the
insurgency has cost, but the Republican War has cost us half a trillion
dollars, and all we have to show for it are 3,600 graves, several
thousand wounded, a civil war and a corrupt, ineffective civilian
government. The Iraqi supply line stretches around the corner; ours
stretches 7,000 miles. The Iraqis know what their mission is; our
soldiers don't have the foggiest notion of why they are still there.
Even to put
the best face on it, we replaced a dictatorship and allowed the
Iraqis free elections and time to adopt a constitution. At that
point, the president should have said: "We've done our part.
Now you're on your own. Goodbye." But no, he didn't do that,
because his intention is for the Republican War to never end and
for our troops to become a permanent part of the Iraqi landscape.
George
W. Bush is by no means the first Westerner to make a fool of himself
by overestimating his powers and underestimating the determination
of the people of the Middle East to rid themselves of foreign conquerors.
July
21, 2007
Charley
Reese [send
him mail] has been a journalist for 49 years.
©
2007 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
Charley
Reese Archives
|