None of Our Business
by
Charley
Reese
by Charley Reese
To George
Clooney and the other Americans who demonstrated and demanded that
the U.S. intervene in the Darfur region of Sudan, I have a simple
and clear message: Buy yourself a gun and plenty of ammunition,
and go intervene yourself.
In the 1930s,
a tougher breed of Americans didn't just demonstrate. They formed
the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, went to Spain and fought in the Spanish
Civil War. A famous movie star, Errol Flynn, risked his life and
suffered wounds carrying money through enemy lines to the loyalist
forces. Of course, Flynn was no sissy. Before becoming an actor,
he was a deep-water sailor and smuggler and barroom brawler par
excellence. He was real man, not an image of a man.
Today's liberals
are made of softer stuff. They don't want to fight or get shot at.
They are too wealthy and live too comfortable a life. They want
some poor American kid making $1,200 a month to go to the African
desert and get killed.
It's a heck
of a note when rich people can salve their conscience by sending
poor kids to fight and die instead of going themselves. Granted,
Clooney would have to do without his personal assistant, script,
air-conditioned trailer and stunt people, but who knows, he might
find real combat exhilarating.
The fighting
in Darfur is not a conflict of good guy versus bad guy. It is bad
guy versus bad guy. Both sides are armed. Both sides have committed
atrocities. Both sides show as much sympathy and mercy for the other
as a rattlesnake does for a mouse.
It is not
a conflict of white versus black. Both sides are black. It is not
a Muslim-versus-Christian conflict. Both sides are Muslim. It might
have even started the way the old range wars started in Wyoming
in the 19th century. One side is nomadic herdsmen; the other side
is farmers. When farmers try to keep herds from grass and water,
there is sure to be gunfire, whether in Sudan or in 19th-century
Wyoming.
The conflict
is, most of all, none of our business. It does not affect the United
States one iota. If it goes on for 10 years, it will not affect
the United States. If it is resolved tomorrow, it will not affect
the United States. We have no strategic or national interests whatsoever
in Sudan. If the people in Sudan wish to kill each other, that is
their business, not ours.
It is past
time for the American people to demand that Congress and the president
stop sending American youth to die in other people's wars. The idea
of using American youth as a hypocritical humanitarian police force
(hypocritical because liberals are always selective in choosing
their crises) is both obscene and unconstitutional. These young
men and women join the armed forces to defend America, not to inject
themselves into other people's local quarrels.
If George
Bush sends American military forces to Sudan, Osama bin Laden will
be so elated he'll dance a jig. He's already warned that Western
intervention in Sudan would be another attack against Islam. Our
forces would find themselves in yet another hornet's nest. And what
are they going to do? Pick one side and shoot the other? Or shoot
people on both sides? Whatever, our intervention will increase the
human misery, not make it better.
The casualty
statistics you keep hearing are unreliable, though I don't doubt
they are high. As for genocide, that word has been defined so loosely
you could be charged with it for shooting a burglar. We did nothing
when Stalin and Mao were slaughtering millions; we did nothing when
Pol Pot murdered a third to a half of the Cambodian population.
We did nothing when the Ibos were wiped out in the Nigeria Civil
War. What's happening in Sudan is Little League compared with all
the mass murders we've ignored.
Americans
ought to remember Mogadishu. The people in western Sudan are so
poor, they'll kill you for your boots. But a barefooted poor man
with a gun is just as lethal as a college-educated American boy.
There are large pockets of human misery all over the world, and
we definitely are not the world's policeman. Why American liberals
have decided to get excited about Darfur, I don't know. I wouldn't
be surprised to find out that the rebel faction has hired a public-relations
firm.
At any rate,
let those itching to intervene go themselves and put their bodies
on the line. They have no right whatsoever to deprive an American
mother of her son just so they can feel good about themselves at
their next cocktail party.
These
pseudo-humanitarians are enough to make you throw up.
May
9, 2006
Charley
Reese [send
him mail] has been a journalist for 49 years.
©
2006 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
Charley
Reese Archives
|