Don't
Blame Mexico
by
Fred Reed
Bobbling about
on the web, like flotsam in some drear tidal pool, is a piece purporting
to show that Mexico mistreats immigrants in all manner of ways offensive
to the North American soul. Most curious. I am one of those immigrants,
and still waiting to be mistreated.
The specific
charges:
In
brief, the Mexican Constitution states that:
- Immigrants
and foreign visitors are banned from public political discourse.
- Immigrants
and foreigners are denied certain basic property rights.
- Immigrants
are denied equal employment rights.
- Immigrants
and naturalized citizens will never be treated as real Mexican
citizens.
- Immigrants
and naturalized citizens are not to be trusted in public service.
- Immigrants
and naturalized citizens may never become members of the clergy.
- Private
citizens may make citizens arrests of lawbreakers (i.e., illegal
immigrants) and hand them to the authorities.
- Immigrants
may be expelled from Mexico for any reason and without due process."
Most of this
is true. Much of it is trying too hard. If it is intended to suggest
that Mexico behaves badly toward legal immigrants, it is silly.
Many hundreds of thousands of American citizens live here and like
it. After all, if they didnt, they could leave. Further, I
think the law entirely reasonable provided that you realize
that the Mexican government exists for the benefit of Mexicans,
not gringos.
Bear in mind
that the United States is far more powerful than Mexico, and far
richer, and that America and Americans are by nature meddlesome.
At the national level the US tries to impose democracy, change regimes,
and dictate social policy in all sorts of countries. At the level
of the individual, Americans, certainly those in Mexico, try to
pass leash laws, make horses wear diapers, regulate smoking, and
set closing hours for bars. Neither the US nor most of its people
grasp that some things are simply not their business.
Protecting
Mexico from such intrusiveness is a concern of the government here.
Politics? No,
you may not engage in politics. I am not sure why Americans think
they should be permitted to, but I know why Mexicans think that
they should not. In the Yankee enclaves, they would take over and
run things as they wanted, not as Mexicans want. They would want
rules, regulations, correct attitudes, laws, laws, laws. They would
want to instruct Mexico. There would be encampments of activists
demonstrating in Chiapas. (When the US has solved its own ethnic
problems, then perhaps it might make polite suggestions to others.
Day after tomorrow, you think?) And a naturalized American is just
an American with a different piece of paper in his pocket: Same
attitudes, culture, and lack of respect for other countries.
The Mexican
approach is, You are free to live here, but we will make our
own laws, thank you. Which makes perfect sense to me. I came
here in large part to escape the micromanagement of everything by
the damned government up north.
Basic
property rights? These are what a particular country says
they are, not what the United States thinks they ought to be. Things
are a tad complex here for historical reasons the ejidos,
land reform for the indigenes and so on. The practical fact is that
if they could, Americans and American corporations would buy up,
for example, all the best beachfront land. They dont, because
Mexico wont let them, which is exactly the right policy. (There
are complex trusts that let foreigners pretty much own land near
the beaches, and many do this.) The fact is that countless gringos
own homes in Mexico with no problem. I do, for example.
From the
website of Adriana Perez Flores, my attorney in Mexico: Until
recently, foreigners could not buy land in Mexico unless the title
was placed in a Trust (Fideicomiso). Now a foreigner can purchase
a home or vacant lot in his own name, except for property located
within 50 kilometers of the coast, or national border. A home in
Puerto Vallarta or Nuevo Laredo would still need to be purchased
in the name of a trust.
Employment
rights? Why do Americans think they have a right to
work in Mexico? As in most countries you need to get a work permit,
and here they tend not to be issued if you are going to take work
away from a Mexican. Perversely, Mexico does not believe that it
exists to employ gringos. Gosh.
If you want
to live here, its easy. You get a tourist visa for 90 days
when you land (try that in the US), and with no hassle you can then
get FM-3 residence status (try that in the US), provided you can
demonstrate an income of $1000 a month. (You are welcome, but Mexico
isnt going to support you. Why should it?) Drivers licenses
are easy. You can bring your car and belongings, and no, the police
arent going to give you a hard time. The government hassles
you far here less than does the government up north. But also no,
you are not going into politics and, if you do something adequately
undesirable, you will be chucked unceremoniously out. And why not?
Due process?
You aren't a citizen. (Read the Patriot Act, by the way.) Behave
or go away. Mexico is much less a police state, much less watched,
tapped, bugged, cross-referenced, data-based, regulated, intimidated,
regimented and politically corrected than the US, which is a major
reason why people come here.
Now, Americans
will say, But Fred, all these Mexicans come into the US and
get welfare, school for their kids, drivers licenses and medical
care, and dont pay taxes, and who knows what all. It isnt
fair.
To which I
respond: All true. But why is it Mexicos fault? You
practically invite them. Mexico has no obligation to keep its citizens
in, though the United States has the right to keep them out. If
you folks up north choose to let in poor Mexicans, dont be
surprised when you have poor Mexicans.
Note that the
immigration problem is entirely of Americas making. Laws,
decisions in the courts, amnesties, interpretation of the Constitution,
and policy all encourage illegal immigration. What the US does is
to say to impoverished and desperate people, See this river?
Dont cross it. If you do, well give you all sorts of
privileges, and jobs, and a chance to advance in life and give your
kids a good future. Now, dont cross it, you hear?
Keeping
immigrants out would once have been easy, but you didnt do
it. You could have fined employers a thousand dollars a day for
hiring illegals, half of it to go to whoever turned the employer
in; denied them all services, and deported them instantly. Today,
taking things away from people who have lives in the States and
kids in the schools would be brutal. (You are going to forcibly
deport millions of people? That will be pretty.) And of course they
soon come to have the votes to make deportation impossible. But
it wouldnt have been in the beginning. Dont blame Mexico
for having an immigration policy more sensible than yours.
April
20, 2006
Fred
Reed is author of Nekkid
in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a Well.
Copyright
© 2006 Fred Reed
Fred
Reed Archives
|