Run for Your Money
by Max Raskin
by
Max Raskin
DIGG THIS
What should
we make of bank runs? Though it is unfortunate so many people have
to suffer because of monetary instability, long lines of panicking
savers scrambling to withdraw their money should be an encouraging
sign that the public might pick up on the giant Ponzi scheme that
is fractional reserve banking. Even though, in all likelihood, the
government will overwhelm those indicting the system, as Mises said,
you cannot have too much of a correct theory. In understanding the
recent run on England’s third largest mortgage lender, Northern
Rock, the inherent fraudulence and theft at the core of that country’s
– as well as our own – monetary system is revealed.
For the
past few years, England’s central bank, the Bank of England, has
been creating artificially low interest rates; this trend could
have not, economically, lasted for long. The market has a natural
interest rate that represents the economy’s overall time preference.
A high interest rate shows a more present-orientated market, whereas
low interest rates indicate that people are comfortable saving.
When the government distorts this indicator by creating low interest
rates, businessmen think they can profitably make more investments
than people are willing to provide savings for.
When interest
rates began to rise – to their highest level in nine years – the
poor investments brought on by easy credit were revealed. As the
London Interbank Offered Rate rose to 6.7975%, higher even than
the Bank of England’s rate, it should have been obvious that sub-prime
mortgages were exactly that – unwise decisions that would not have
been made without the artificial socializing of risk.
Northern
Rock, a company that made poor business decisions by granting mortgages
to people with poor/no credit history, felt this shock the hardest.
When news leaked that they were requesting the Bank of England bail
them out, the lines began forming.
Let’s contrast
what should have happened to Northern Rock, with what did happen.
If the British government were one that protected property rights
by forcing banks to pay their debtors or else shut down, then this
problem would not exist. Fractional reserve banking rests on the
delusion that if the banks can fool enough people into thinking
that they can withdraw their money at any given time, then they
can expand credit and make all sorts of unwise investments. The
minute the public gets wind of the bank’s insolvency, as with the
latest crisis, they rush to demand their money. On the free market,
fractional reserve banking is no more of a problem than fractional
reserve car dealerships. If a car dealer sells two deeds to the
same car it is clearly fraud. Yet somehow the banks are not burdened
with the inconvenient job of repaying their depositors. Unlike the
central bank, the car dealer cannot print more cars.
Not surprisingly,
when the government gets involved, fraud runs rampant. Instead of
allowing the bank to close down and be replaced by a more efficient
one, the Bank of England bailed out Northern Rock. Chancellor of
the Exchequer, Alistair Darling said that the Bank would ensure
the deposits of Northern Rock customers because of, "the importance
I place on maintaining a stable banking system." In its role as
lender of last resort, the Bank of England would certainly be capable
of ensuring those deposits – it’s as easy as just printing more
money. On September 19th, the Bank injected 10 billion
pounds into the British economy and essentially allowed the whole
scheme to continue. Where did they get this money?
Certainly
they couldn’t have raised taxes overnight. And they didn’t borrow
it. Instead, they did as all governments do – they inflated. Though
the mechanism by which this occurred, namely through the buying
and selling of securities, is complex, money was essentially created
out of thin air. This is nothing more than legal counterfeiting.
If the creation of money dilutes the value of existing money, then
this was certainly theft on a massive scale.
And who
is it to benefit? Certainly not the average man. Instead, as with
the U.S. economy, when the Bank of England injects "liquidity"
into the money markets, they are generally helping some of the richest
in society by essentially giving them not only a subsidy, but also
a way to beat out inflation. When Bernanke lowers the interest rate
half a percentage point, Wall Street goes bananas.
Although
with the Associated Press quoting
Murray Rothbard there’s no need to fall into despair.
September
28, 2007
Max
Raskin [send him mail]
goes to high school in New Jersey. He was a summer researcher at
the Mises Institute in 2007.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Max
Raskin Archives
|