Fascism
Comes to America
Part 4: 1916–1918
by
Ralph Raico
by Ralph Raico
When the United
States entered the First World War, in April 1917, President Woodrow
Wilson announced his policy. It would be, "Force! Force to
the utmost! Force without stint or limit!" That it would be
force directed against the American people themselves soon became
evident.
On the economic
front, as Murray Rothbard wrote, World War I was "the critical
watershed for the American business system." A war-collectivism
was instituted which "served as the model, the precedent, and
the inspiration for state corporate capitalism for the remainder
of the century." The Lever Act alone put Washington in charge
of the production and distribution of all food and fuel in the country.
One of the chief progressives, Herbert Hoover, was appointed food
administrator of the United States. As such, among his many initiatives,
Hoover afterwards a revered "conservative" elder
statesman had the government purchase the entire U.S. and
Cuban sugar crops. Another progressive, Bernard Baruch, head of
the War Industries Board, fixed prices and allocated priorities
throughout much of the economy.
Robert Higgs,
in Crisis and Leviathan, lists some of the major statist intrusions
in the course of the war:
"By the
time of the armistice, the government had taken over the ocean-shipping,
railroad, telephone, and telegraph industries; commandeered hundreds
of manufacturing plants; entered into massive enterprises on its
own account in such varied departments as shipbuilding, wheat trading,
and building construction; undertaken to lend huge sums to business
directly or indirectly and to regulate the private issuance of securities;
established official priorities for the use of transportation facilities,
food, fuel, and many raw materials; fixed the prices of dozens of
important commodities; intervened in hundreds of labor disputes;
and conscripted millions of men for service in the armed forces."
Shrewdly, the
Washington planners assured themselves of the collaboration of big
business and organized labor by guaranteeing high profit margins
and by pushing wherever possible for unionization of the sectors
of the economy they now controlled.
Franklin Roosevelt,
the dynamic young assistant secretary of the Navy, who already cherished
presidential ambitions, was an avid spectator of this statist tidal
wave. Hoover and Baruch were among his close friends; the latter
was to remain so to the end of FDR's life. Much in Roosevelt's early
New Deal, especially the National Recovery Administration (NRA),
was copied from what he himself called "the great cooperation
of 1917 and 1918."
Besides wholesale
violations of economic freedom, the war years saw the brutal suppression
of freedom of speech and of the press, especially by means of the
Espionage and Sedition Acts. Anyone who voiced dissent from the
government's line was branded a traitor and treated accordingly.
This, too, was noted by the young Navy bureaucrat, as was the supine
acquiescence of the U.S. Supreme Court in these blatant infringements
of the constitutional rights of Americans.
Over at the
Navy Department, when Roosevelt wasn't conspiring against his boss,
Josephus Daniels, he was coming up with one brainstorm after another.
If one scheme didn't pan out, he would go off in a different direction.
The main thing was just to keep on doing things the model
for his conduct in the New Deal. Of course, the U.S. Navy lent its
full support to Britain in tightening the hunger-blockade around
Germany, with the aim, and result, of starving the civilian population.
Roosevelt's pet project was the building of a barrage of mines across
the entrance to the North Sea, between Scotland and Norway, to prevent
U-boats from reaching the Atlantic. The cost was $80 million. But
the U-boat commanders found it easy to maneuver under and around
the barrage. At most, it cost the Germans six submarines. It had
no effect whatever on the course of the war in the North Atlantic.
Meanwhile,
Eleanor had her hands full, raising five children and learning the
social graces required by the Washington set she and her husband
were obliged to travel in. She was given to occasional gaffes. When
a reporter asked her how she was managing her household under wartime
conditions, she replied that her ten servants were very good at
coming up with cost-cutting suggestions. It didn't help that Eleanor
was under the constant eye of her first cousin, the wonderfully
bitchy Alice Roosevelt Longworth (her most famous quip, to an unattached
lady at a dinner party: "Well, if you don't have anything good
to say about anyone here come sit by me"). "Alice
of Malice," as Bill Kauffman called her, in one of the best
essays in his brilliant collection, America First!, was Teddy's
daughter and a matron of Washington high society. A carping critic
and constant thorn in the side of the Hyde Park Roosevelts, she
would outlive them all, dying in 1980. Not by chance, Alice played
a role in the dreadful predicament that confronted Franklin and
Eleanor in 1917.
Three years
earlier, Eleanor had engaged a social secretary, Lucy Mercer, who
was charming, poised, lovely, and 22 years old. When Eleanor was
out of town with the children, as during the summers spent at Campobello,
Lucy remained in the capital. It was obvious that Franklin was attracted
to Lucy and that she returned his interest. Alice Roosevelt Longworth
fueled the fire by inviting them to dinners when Eleanor was away.
As Alice of Malice later put it: "It was good for Franklin.
He deserved a good time. He was married to Eleanor." Now very
much in love, Franklin had Lucy commissioned a yeoman in the Navy,
and transferred to his office. One day, going through some of her
husband's papers, Eleanor discovered love letters from Lucy. Further
evidence of the affair came to light in the register of a motel
in Virginia Beach, where Franklin and Lucy had checked in as husband
and wife.
Eleanor was
devastated. She raised the possibility of divorce. But divorce would,
it was thought, harm the children; it would certainly have ended
Franklin's political career. Through the mediation of Louis Howe
and other intimates, a modus vivendi was arrived at. Roosevelt had
to give up Lucy, but as far as Eleanor was concerned, marital relations
were over. In any case, she was tired of childbearing, and, as she
later confided to her daughter, Anna, she was totally ignorant of
contraceptive methods and too bashful to inquire about them. Their
son James wrote: "Father and mother had an armed truce that
endured to the day he died, despite several occasions I was to observe
in which he in one way or another held out his arms to mother, and
she flatly refused to enter his embrace." According to James,
for Eleanor the episode "left a residue of bitterness that
remained with her all her life."
Unhappy and
unfulfilled in her marriage, Eleanor Roosevelt turned increasingly
to political affairs, lecturing anybody who would listen on everything
under the sun. As for Franklin, though he ended his liaison, he
and Lucy remained close friends. The portrait he was sitting for
in Warm Springs when he died in April 1945, had been commissioned
by Lucy Mercer.
In the summer
of 1918, Roosevelt left on an official visit to Europe. His plan
was to hobnob with the elite in the Allied countries, travel to
the blood-drenched Western Front, and inspect units of the American
Expeditionary Force (AEF) that had seen combat. FDR looked on it
all as a grand adventure. Crossing the Atlantic, he was practically
bursting with excitement, despite the danger of German submarines.
In Britain, he met with the top echelon of the military and political
establishment, including King George V. For a fervent Anglophile
like Roosevelt, it was like coming home. He conferred with Clemenceau
and the chief French generals in Paris.
Touring the
Western Front, Franklin witnessed combat, viewed the remains of
the men and horses on the battlefield, and saw the shattered survivors.
Yet, as a highly sympathetic biographer, Frank Freidel, wrote, "He
was fascinated rather than repelled." In fact, FDR was as boyishly
delighted by the sights and sounds of war as the man who would later
become his friend, Winston Churchill. Of course, patriotism played
its part, as well. It was so inspiring to experience the might of
America being deployed for the first time on European killing-fields.
The AEF had been instrumental in halting the last German offensive
and turning the tide of battle. In high spirits, Roosevelt wrote
to Eleanor: "The counter-attack in the Rheims salient [by American
forces] has heartened everybody enormously. Our men have undoubtedly
done well. One of my Marine regiments has lost 1200 and another
800 men."
FDR's euphoria
continued after his return to Washington. He even decided to apply
for a commission. This would put him on a par with his cousin Teddy,
who had fought in the Spanish-American War, and even one-up old
TR, whose request to serve in the European War had been refused
by Wilson. But Franklin's appeal for a combat role was belated
the war was nearly over, and Wilson turned him down. Still, the
excitement of it all remained with him the thrill of mingling
with the other masters of men, the dark yet alluring drama of warfare,
and, not least, the exhilaration of wielding power over the lives,
liberties, and property of the great American people. To William
Castle, a friend and State Department official, Roosevelt confided:
"It would be wonderful to be a war President of the United
States."
The Germans
finally surrendered on November 11, 1918. It was argued by some
that the war-collectivism imposed by Wilson on the United States
was a major reason for the splendid victory. Roosevelt certainly
believed so. But considering that Germany was in the forefront of
the countries that embraced war-collectivism, that would be a hard
argument to sustain.
In early 1919,
the Peace Conference convened in Paris. Here America and the world
finally would reap the harvest of eternal peace and justice for
which so much had been sacrificed. But the British, French, Italian,
and other foreign leaders had their own agendas. Wilson, woefully
ignorant of the realities of European politics and befuddled by
his own high-sounding rhetoric, floundered helplessly. One thing
he held on to, the prize that was supposed to make up for all his
deceptions of the American people and of himself the League
of Nations. The League Covenant was added to the Treaty of Versailles,
which Wilson brought back to the United States for ratification
by the Senate. In the end, the Senate rejected it.
In retrospect
and contrary to what countless globalists have insisted
it is clear that American participation in the League would have
been a disaster for our country. According to the Covenant, the
United States pledged itself to join in punishing "aggressors"
against world peace by military means, if necessary. An aggressor
was defined as any power that attempted to use force to change international
boundaries as they existed in 1919. Thus, America would have been
obligated to defend the international order created at Paris, the
order of Anglo-French world hegemony. (By 1922, Germany and Soviet
Russia were already collaborating to undermine that order.) Joining
the League would have instantly plunged America into the midst of
the seething hatreds and rivalries of the Old World. But, in submitting
the Treaty of Versailles to the Senate, that is precisely what Woodrow
Wilson intended to do. Perhaps needless to say, Franklin Roosevelt
was a passionate enthusiast of Wilson's League of Nations.
Next
Chapter Table
of Contents
Ralph
Raico [send him mail]
is
a senior fellow of the Mises Institute. You can study the history
of civilization under his guidance here: MP3-CD
and Audio
Tape.
Copyright ©
1998-2001 Future of Freedom Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.
Ralph
Raico Archives
|