There was once an elderly black prison inmate they called "Tunnel
Joe." His nickname tells us all we need to know about his favorite
pastime. When he "went down" as they say in the penal
system, there were still gas lights on the streets of Baltimore.
After literally dozens of failed attempts, old Joe finally dug his
way out of the penitentiary in the early 1970s. He turned himself
in the same day. The world had changed too much, Joe didnít even
recognize it. He missed the order and discipline of his prison routine.
His newfound freedom terrified him. He had become institutionalized.
Institutional Man is a relatively new species, and is perhaps the
only man who truly evolved into his situation. Darwin, who is even
now sharing a room in Hell with Karl Marx, got it wrong in every
particular. We, as a species, are a product of Godís own hand, not
of random chance. Yet Institutional Man is in fact the product of
evolution. Not however, of any hare-brained process such as "survival
of the fittest." Quite the contrary. He is the end result of
a societal process that incorporates warped theories on several
fronts. Psychiatry, socialism, public education, and the warfare
state have combined in him to create that well known and long anticipated
result of years of social and cultural warfare: The New Man.
He is sensitive and caring, taking pride in his ability to avoid
"hurtful" phrasing or gender specific pronouns. Thousands
of trees have been consumed thanks to his careful use of "his
or her" rather than the "his" employed during thousand
years of successful Western culture.
He renounces the use of firearms by individuals yet somehow is
able to enthusiastically condone any State-sponsored violence, particularly
when employed against supposed miscreants like the Serbs. Institutional
Man is paradoxically the ultimate end product of the State yet he
rejoices when those wicked "nationalists" get bombed.
His love of violence, both the state sponsored kind, and the media
"entertainment" variety is juxtaposed with his loudly
proclaimed distaste for weaponry and an almost pathological unwillingness
to confront his oppressors. He is against capital punishment except
in specific cases where the defendant has raised his hand against
the government or harmed a member of one of the officially protected
groups such as homosexuals or abortionists.
Institutional Man was first identified toward the end of the twentieth
century in Russia, where a failed experiment in socialism had become
sidetracked and left a huge country in a state of bovine anarchy.
Picture a pasture with cows lowing plaintively, and no farmer to
milk them. The Soviet Man as depicted in the art of the Stalinist
age was a handsome fellow, typically clutching tools or weapons
as he confidently lead the proletariat into the imagined new age
of socialism and collectivism where all men strove together to make
the world a better place.
Seventy years later Soviet Man was leaning against the fence in
his communist pasture, waiting for someone to come and milk him
of his freedom. He had become institutionalized. He depended upon
the state for his lodging, his job, his political opinions and his
travel. The various state security organs protected him from those
whose thoughts might upset him and a system of informers taught
him a sort of furtive watchfulness. He had, as it has been said,
neither fear nor hope.
When freedom beckoned to the erstwhile Soviet Union, it was confused
by Institutional Man with economic well being, and since that hasnít
manifested itself as yet, he has scant regard for freedom with out
it. After all, the state had taken such good care of him, and now
there is all this responsibility and he is still poor! Institutional
Man is not equipped to handle failure, he has relied upon the State
to shield him from any blows to his self esteem. Asking such a man
to take the risks implied by political and economic freedom, and
you may just be asking too much. Freedom after all, is an abstract
concept. Unlike vodka and brake fluid, freedom doesnít do much for
your head. It is a thing of the heart, and seventy years in a police
state turns human hearts cold.
The next sighting was in the United States. This is the place where
storm troopers with automatic weapons and body armor appear in their
hundreds to arrest sheep. Sometimes the sheep are even of the mutton
variety, as we learned last week in Vermont. Heaven help them if
they had resisted, but as a resigned shepherd put it, as he gazed
out at the tough hombres of the FDA in their SWAT costumes, "We
are a nation of laws, and I must abide by those laws." Un huh.
What was it Mao said comes out the barrel of a gun?
In America, Institutional Man has a very important role to play.
He must deplore violence and "hurtful" conduct while embracing
minorities and immigrants in the joyful certainty that diversity
is ultimately the key to success in his culture. He has learned
that he must forget the several thousand years of successful Western
Culture in order to embrace this new diversity that holds so much
promise and he has done that by turning his children over to the
state for "instruction" in special centers called "public
schools" where they too, can be institutionalized or "socialized"
to use the term employed by the government flunkies who masquerade
there as teachers.
Institutional Man demonstrates a type of moral courage not seen
since the heady days of Molech worship in the middle east of Biblical
times. It takes a real committed individual to renounce his own
heritage and give up his children to the fire.
What makes Institutional Man so important in our modern culture
is his ability to turn off the reasoning process and accept what
ever he is told, particularly if the channel of indoctrination is
the television set. His advantage is this: unbound by any primitive
urge for what we used to call "freedom," he can employ
his new found skills to his advantage and learn to make use of the
contradictions and inconsistencies of his masterís ideology, while
never questioning the value of that ideology or itís substance.
A good example of Institutional Man is the sub genus, "Republican."
These are folks of a conservative political persuasion who have
convinced themselves that the things they purport to believe in
are actually bad. When black people rejected the Republican Party
in the recent election, the answer to Republicans was simply to
"reach out" to the blacks, rather than simply assume that
blacks had rejected their Republican ideals. Yes, itís much easier
to change your ideals than to be considered "insensitive."
Talk about moral courage!
Our new man has little of what we used to consider freedom, yet
at the same time he glories in a whole new type of freedom, that
is totally liberating, enabling, and supportive of his self esteem.
In short, he can adapt to any set of beliefs, turn on a dime, and
even support mutually conflicting views without trauma. Unlike the
"freedom" of days gone by, this new liberating force that
has given us Institutional Man allows for no fear of failure. Socialism
is after all, the Viagra of politics Ė all men are successful all
the time, and in the same way, lest one should set himself up as
somehow "superior!" It is the ultimate triumph of the
labor union mentality.
Institutional Man is a kinder fellow than his predecessors and
is willing to see the other side of things. He knows that minorities
commit well over half the violent crimes in this country yet he
does not degrade himself by suggesting that they be punished. No,
Institutional Man realizes that there is still much to be done before
the lingering traces of racism are expunged from this culture, and
he will undertake a program of self criticism to see why others
are committing crimes. No one would commit a crime simply because
they are a bad person Ė no, it must be their upbringing. Wouldnít
want to fall into that obsolete Christian mindset that suggests
that all men are sinners. Thatís a bit hard on the ole self
esteem. Itís also hard on governments, whose propensity to humility
and self examination is minimal. Wouldnít want to bite the hand
In one horrifying phrase, we have the crux of where our society
is today, and where it is going: "much remains to be done."
That is the key to understanding our modern culture. The cultural
Marxists who have dominated our society for many years now, have
an agenda. To them, everything is a step on the road to Ė where?
The sad fact is that they themselves donít even know the answer
to that one. Institutional Man is traveling down a relativistic
highway to nowhere. He is part of a grand and wicked conspiracy
against mankind, and doesnít know it. He has allied himself with
the devil, and refuses to even recognize the existence of his master,
yet serves him faithfully.
Itís important to understand that when governments say that men
are naturally good, and merely require decent treatment to release
all that inherent goodness, that they are mocking the Word of God.
The importance of the Word can best be understand when we look carefully
at how often the other side is taking shots at it. Institutional
Man is unaware of this battle, after all it doesnít concern him.
He is very much aware of the perceived need for a wall of separation
between church and state. Yet donít be fooled by this Ė he hasnít
actually read the constitution Ė he has no need for that. The media
and the government are sure to keep him aware of everything he needs
Letís pretend for a second that the cultural Marxists have finally
won Ė the battle is over and they are ready to do it their
way. The one world government is now in control, all vestiges of
nationalism are expunged. No hurtful symbols like Confederate flags
or shamrocks remain anywhere in the world. The boy scouts have been
disbanded and no guns are in private ownership anywhere. Every government
program that has ever been proposed is now in force, and an army
of bureaucrats swarm over the world, protecting us from ourselves.
A single, central military force protects us from any and all threats
and we live in a happy socialist paradise, our every want provided
But they will still tell you, "much remains to be done."
As long as a human being remains alive, the forces of the left will
sing that same song. Because theirs is a doctrine of death. No matter
what lies they tell, or what political party they hide behind; no
matter what they may tell themselves, theirs is a danse macabre,
with only one ultimate destination.
The freedom they promise is not the Godly freedom which Americans
once cherished Ė no that was too much work. It included too much
responsibility and demanded too much of the individual. The enemy
is very much of the hive Ė indeed it goes beyond that. The leftist
killers, for such is what they are, are a force of nature, of entropy.
Their ideas of big government and the nanny state stifle and suffocate
men and ideas; in their maturity they murder in huge numbers. Whenever
a leftist government has been allowed to survive for any length
of time, the result has been death in large numbers.
The "advances" of this age tell the story. Abortion in
numbers so huge as to stagger the imagination. Wars and ethnic violence,
as leftist do gooders implement their devilish doctrine of enforced
was a reason we used to like to live in our own countries, with
our own cultural norms. Japanese are Japanese, and Germans are Germans.
Muslims are not going to get along with Christians nor are the Irish
ever likely to welcome the British into Belfast. By propagating
a lie, the socialists tell us that these are mere human foibles
and can be overcome if we will only evolve into something better.
And so we have. We have become the Institutional Man Ė he who pays
his taxes gladly, and watches "Autopsy" on TV. Waiting,
always waiting, because "much remains to be done."
Mr. Peirce fought with the Rhodesian freedom fighters (the Ian
Smith side, of course).