|
The Neoconservative Empire
by
Ron Paul
by Ron Paul
DIGG THIS
Statement
on the Iraq War Resolution
Before the U.S. House of Representatives February 14, 2007
This
grand debate is welcomed but it could be that this is nothing more
than a distraction from the dangerous military confrontation approaching
with Iran and supported by many in leadership on both sides of the
aisle.
This resolution,
unfortunately, does not address the disaster in Iraq. Instead, it
seeks to appear opposed to the war while at the same time offering
no change of the status quo in Iraq. As such, it is not actually
a vote against a troop surge. A real vote against a troop surge
is a vote against the coming supplemental appropriation that finances
it. I hope all of my colleagues who vote against the surge today
will vote against the budgetary surge when it really counts: when
we vote on the supplemental.
The biggest
red herring in this debate is the constant innuendo that those who
dont support expanding the war are somehow opposing the troops.
Its nothing more than a canard to claim that those of us who
struggled to prevent the bloodshed and now want it stopped are somehow
less patriotic and less concerned about the welfare of our military
personnel.
Osama bin Laden
has expressed sadistic pleasure with our invasion of Iraq and was
surprised that we served his interests above and beyond his dreams
on how we responded after the 9/11 attacks. His pleasure comes from
our policy of folly getting ourselves bogged down in the middle
of a religious civil war, 7,000 miles from home that is financially
bleeding us to death. Total costs now are reasonably estimated to
exceed $2 trillion. His recruitment of Islamic extremists has been
greatly enhanced by our occupation of Iraq.
Unfortunately,
we continue to concentrate on the obvious mismanagement of a war
promoted by false information and ignore debating the real issue
which is: Why are we determined to follow a foreign policy of empire
building and pre-emption which is unbecoming of a constitutional
republic?
Those on the
right should recall that the traditional conservative position of
non-intervention was their position for most of the 20th Century-and
they benefited politically from the wars carelessly entered into
by the political left. Seven years ago the Right benefited politically
by condemning the illegal intervention in Kosovo and Somalia. At
the time conservatives were outraged over the failed policy of nation
building.
Its important
to recall that the left, in 2003, offered little opposition to the
pre-emptive war in Iraq, and many are now not willing to stop it
by de-funding it or work to prevent an attack on Iran.
The catch-all
phrase, War on Terrorism, in all honesty, has no more
meaning than if one wants to wage a war against criminal gangsterism.
Its deliberately vague and non definable to justify and permit
perpetual war anywhere, and under any circumstances. Dont
forget: the Iraqis and Saddam Hussein had absolutely nothing to
do with any terrorist attack against us including that on 9/11.
Special interests
and the demented philosophy of conquest have driven most wars throughout
history. Rarely has the cause of liberty, as it was in our own revolution,
been the driving force. In recent decades our policies have been
driven by neo-conservative empire radicalism, profiteering in the
military industrial complex, misplaced do-good internationalism,
mercantilistic notions regarding the need to control natural resources,
and blind loyalty to various governments in the Middle East.
For all the
misinformation given the American people to justify our invasion,
such as our need for national security, enforcing UN resolutions,
removing a dictator, establishing a democracy, protecting our oil,
the argument has been reduced to this: If we leave now Iraq will
be left in a mess-implying the implausible that if we stay it wont
be a mess.
Since it could
go badly when we leave, that blame must be placed on those who took
us there, not on those of us who now insist that Americans no longer
need be killed or maimed and that Americans no longer need to kill
any more Iraqis. Weve had enough of both!
Resorting to
a medical analogy, a wrong diagnosis was made at the beginning of
the war and the wrong treatment was prescribed. Refusing to reassess
our mistakes and insist on just more and more of a failed remedy
is destined to kill the patient-in this case the casualties will
be our liberties and prosperity here at home and peace abroad.
Theres
no logical reason to reject the restraints placed in the Constitution
regarding our engaging in foreign conflicts unrelated to our national
security. The advice of the founders and our early presidents was
sound then and its sound today.
We
shouldnt wait until our financial system is completely ruined
and we are forced to change our ways. We should do it as quickly
as possible and stop the carnage and financial bleeding that will
bring us to our knees and force us to stop that which we should
have never started.
We all know,
in time, the war will be de-funded one way or another and the troops
will come home. So why not now?
February
15, 2007
Dr. Ron
Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
Ron
Paul Archives
|