"Government
is … the most effective instrument available by which a politically
organized society can pursue its common objectives, including
the shared aim of securing the protection of legal rights
for all."
~
Stephen Holmes and Cass R. Sunstein
The
Costs of Rights
"FAA
headquarters: They're pulling Jeff away to go talk about
United 93.
Command
Center: Uh, do we want to think about, uh, scrambling
aircraft?
FAA
headquarters: Uh, God, I don't know.
Command
Center: Uh, that's a decision somebody's gonna have to
make probably in the next 10 minutes.
FAA
headquarters: Uh, ya know everybody just left the room."
~
Transcript, September 11, 2001
If
a novelist of Dostoevsky’s caliber set out to illustrate the inherent
incompetence of government, he could not surpass the impact of
a third-rate journalist’s account of what the federal government
"did" on September 11, 2001. Then, add in for good measure
what we know about the state’s pre-9/11 and post-9/11 screw-ups,
and the myth of the modern state as our indispensable protector
has been destroyed.
This
myth is easily propagated. All it takes is some wishful thinking
and jawboning. "Government is great, blah, blah, blah. .
. Without government, Arab terrorists would hijack planes and
crash them into the World Trade Center, blah, blah, blah. . ."
On 9/11, this idea, this will o’ the wisp fantasy, was sorely
tested. All we asked was that it emerge from the craniums of state-worshipping
hacks such as Mario Cuomo and Rudy Giuliani and have the nerve
to meet Mr. Reality. It chickened out and checked out and is currently
hiding out.
Let
me back up a bit before I indict the state for criminal negligence.
They
can’t complain about money. The agencies in question had a combined
budget of over three hundred billion dollars. They can’t complain
about power. Defense, Justice, CIA, FAA, et al. had plenty of
power. They can’t complain that we didn’t centralize power enough.
The feds, not local yokels, were in charge. Manpower was not lacking;
they had millions of warm bodies. Education was not lacking: Ph.D’s
and Ivy League B.S.’s were falling all over each other.
Then,
when all that talent, brains, money and power was desperately
needed, what happened? Utter incompetence, confusion, delay, indecisiveness,
ill-preparedness, and stupidity from start to finish.
The
sins of commission and omission are so numerous, let me chart
them out:
Pre-9/11
Incompetence
-
Sixty
years of anti-Arab or anti-Islamic foreign intervention
-
Funding
the Mujahideen
-
Banning
guns in the cockpits
-
War
on drugs funneling drug profits to al Qaeda and the Taliban
-
Federal
subsidies to the Taliban
-
Failing
to follow-up on leads that could have led to the thwarting
of the attack
-
Locking
the doors to the roof of the WTC because of bureaucratic infighting
9/11
Incompetence
-
No
apparent air defense of Washington or our most important city,
New York
-
No
apparent plan for responding to mass hijackings
-
FAA
receives accidental transmission from the hijackers and responds
slowly
-
NORAD
is confused, indecisive and slow
-
No
fighters near New York
-
Total
confusion in the chain of command
-
Complete
confusion about what to do about hijacked planes shoot them
down?
-
Shoot-down
order issued after the attacks but never relayed to
the pilots
-
George
Bush reads to children while the nation is attacked
-
Air
Force One communications failures
-
Where
are the hijacked planes?
-
Where
is our radar?
-
Poor
communications equipment after the towers were hit, causing
many unnecessary deaths (but pension benefits had been fully
funded)
Post-9/11
Incompetence
-
Killing
non-combatants in Afghanistan, manufacturing new terrorists
and new propaganda for existing terrorists
-
Occupying
and trying to convert an ungovernable country (Afghanistan)
into a Western-style corporate state "democracy,"
at a huge financial cost and loss of American and Afghan lives,
creating even more impetus and propaganda for terrorists
-
Invading
and occupying yet another ungovernable country (Iraq invented
by Winnie Churchill and the U. S.), and trying to convert
it into a Western-style corporate state "democracy,"
at a huge financial cost and loss of American and Iraqi lives,
creating even more impetus and propaganda for terrorists,
and giving terrorists a rallying point for killing Americans
So,
our much-vaunted and ballyhooed government, when it really mattered,
on the worst day in American history, blew it; stunk up the joint.
Worse yet, it actively generated the conditions that gave rise
to the attack! And it responded to the attack by means that will
increase terrorism in the future.
[Great
courage was shown by rescue personnel on the ground and by the
passengers and crew of United Airlines Flight 93.]
And
please, don’t you clowns tell us you’ll do better next time. So
will they! Just as you were fighting the last war on 9/11 against
the Russians or the Canadians or the Sandinistas or the Michigan
Militia – the next time they strike, you’ll still be fighting
9/11 and we’ll get our butts kicked again. "When will they
ever learn?"
Why
is government incompetent? Its vice is identical to its alleged
virtue: power. The very power we are told government must have
to fulfill its mission shields its principals from real world
feedback about their performance. Government has the power to
pay its employees continual raises regardless of performance.
Predictably, those employees soon get fat, dumb, and happy. Though
there are some competent people in government, the overwhelming
motivation of people who seek government jobs is job security,
the near-certainty of receiving a paycheck week after week, year
after year, with virtually no concern for performance and very
little chance of losing their jobs.
While
there are certainly good reasons for people to be concerned about
job security, what kinds of people will put that one consideration
above all others in pursuing a career? Perhaps those who lack
confidence in their own ability to function in a competitive environment
where one’s performance is constantly scrutinized and judged by
employers, business associates, customers and clients. Thus, our
9/11 response team was staffed mainly by people who consciously
and deliberately seek out employment scenarios where their performance
is unlikely to be closely scrutinized in any meaningful way. And
since no was ever fired and no one resigned, they were right.
Government
has the power to put any competitors out of business and thus
like any monopolist it gets lazy and complacent. It has the power
to immunize itself against accountability for its errors and omissions.
It therefore, over time, adopts a mindset of mindless irresponsibility,
best exemplified by its casual attitude toward the murder of non-combatants.
By its very nature, the state cannot be bound by the moral strictures
binding on the rest of us. Thus, over time, its agents adopt a
mindset of operational nihilism leading to such holocausts as
the bombings of Dresden, Tokyo,
Hiroshima and Nagasaki still fiercely defended to this day.
On
a more technical level, there is Lew Rockwell’s brilliant yet
Nobel Prize-losing insight
extending Mises’ explanation for the failure of state socialism
that governments in mixed economies likewise cannot rationally
plan in the absence of market feedback. Surely, if those who worked
in the World Trade Center had manifested their security concerns
in a market, they would have paid for defense against an air assault,
and forgone protection of Japan, Korea and Germany and the jailing
of marijuana merchants. Unrestrained by the need to make a profit
by pleasing customers, military planners squander billions of
dollars guided mainly by self-interest, whim, cronyism, graft,
and special interest group dynamics. Left out of the equation:
any defense of our most important city on 9/11. And we
used to laugh about the Russians waiting in line to buy toilet
paper.
If
we perform an "institutional analysis" (excuse my pretension),
we reach the same conclusion. How did the federal government get
its power? By winning a war against the Confederacy by sacrificing
its own soldiers' lives to wear down a smaller but better army.
Mohamed Atta did not secede from the Union on 9/11 so Grant’s
gambit would not have been effective.
How
does it maintain that power?
-
By
raising revenue by threatening to imprison its recalcitrant
citizens. (Mr. Atta was not evading taxes, sorry.)
-
By
maintaining sufficient force to ward off its displacement
by a foreign state or domestic revolutionary movement. (Sorry,
the soon to be ashen Mr. Atta was not, contrary to neocon
propaganda, trying to take over the U. S. Government on 9/11.)
-
Persuading
its population, largely dumbed-down by government-schooling,
that it is great, good and indispensable. (Sorry, you didn’t
convince Mr. Atta.)
What
else is the federal government good at? Mass destruction of cities
and populations given some advance notice. Sorry, Mr. Atta kept
his counsel.
Thus,
the institutional skills of the government, each designed to facilitate
its self-preservation, were all quite useless to us on 9/11. Of
course, the propaganda machine kicked in immediately to contain
the damage to the state’s reputation. All it took was
a former rogue prosecutor turned washed-up politician and burlesque
adulterer to stand in front of the cameras and mouth platitudes
for a few days to convince the dimwits that all was well.
It’s
time to realize that the federal government is led by a bunch
of incompetent, brain-less morons who are a threat to our personal
and national security. Thanks, Abe, for creating this useless
monster. Though it is not clear what can be done about it, at
the very least you can go to sleep tonight knowing the truth.
After all, tomorrow is another day.