|
Prince Andrew the Magnanimous?
by
James Ostrowski
When
I first heard that Mario, I mean Andrew, Cuomo was dropping out
of the race for Governor of New York, I thought about a scandal.
However, when I heard that Bill Clinton was going to attend the
press conference, I decided that this was about something more insidious
than a scandal. Besides, the Cuomos are too monomaniacal in pursuit
of power to get tangled up in a petty scandal. No, I quickly realized
that this was a calculated political move.
Cuomo
realized he would lose the Democratic primary election to Carl McCall
and that McCall would lose to George Pataki in November, thus giving
young Cuomo another chance in four years when Pataki retires into
a warm-weather ambassadorship. (McCall is doomed in November because
Pataki has already purchased enough votes to win.) So Andrew got
out while the getting out was good. He converted a purely self-serving
act into an apparent display of party-unifying statesmanship. In
a word, brilliant. The Cuomos are nothing if not brilliant.
All
of this raises a few questions, though. Why was Andrew running in
the first place? According to Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, quoted
in the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle on Wednesday, Cuomo
"never produced a rationale for his candidacy." That’s
okay. I will. Cuomo says he will vote for and support Carl McCall.
He could have voted for McCall without spending five million dollars
first. As a casual observer of the campaign, I could discern no
differences between the two on issues or philosophy. Cuomo’s only
real "issue" was that, had he been Governor, he would
have elbowed Rudy Giuliani out of the way of the cameras in the
days following September 11th. Cuomo’s main substantive
issue was homelessness. Funny that he never considered starting
a construction company.
As
for qualifications, Cuomo’s main executive experience was a stint
at HUD, that can best be described as HUD-like (and that ain’t good).
In contrast, McCall’s tenure as state comptroller has been uneventful,
which is a plus. You don’t want an eventful tenure if you are a
comptroller. Also, for a New York Democratic politician, McCall
isn’t too bad. Not being Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, or Eliot
Spitzer is surely worth some sort of prize.
Thus,
by the process of elimination (of bull), we arrive at the conclusion
that Prince Andrew ran because he likes power. When he realized
that by continuing to run, he was jeopardizing his prospects for
future power, he ran away. If I am wrong, then Andrew Kennedy Cuomo
should and would have spent the last few days of the primary election
explaining to the voters why he was running, other than to satisfy
his familial lust for power.
September
6, 2002
James
Ostrowski is an attorney practicing at 984 Ellicott Square, Buffalo,
New York 14203; (716) 854-1440; FAX 853-1303. See his website
at http://jimostrowski.com.
Copyright
© 2002 LewRockwell.com
James
Ostrowski Archives
|