Beware
of Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing
by Jacob Steelman
by
Jacob Steelman
DIGG THIS
Be careful
when investment bankers start advancing ideas for solving the financial
crisis which is upon us – especially when the solution is more government
regulation and spending. Two prominent members of the investment
community have been promoting solutions for "solving"
our current crisis. Felix Rohatyn, long a partner and managing director
of Lazard Frères and now an advisor to Lehman Brothers, has
been advocating a massive government "investment" program.
George Soros, the hedge fund operator, currency speculator and investor,
has been promoting government regulation of the credit markets in
addition to government regulation of the money supply by the Federal
Reserve. This is just more of the same self-interest government
interventionism and corporate welfarism that we have seen promoted
over the past 100 years in the United States and around the world
which has led us to one financial crisis after another.
Rohatyn, who
is frequently credited with the federal government (American taxpayer)
bailing out New York City from its financial crisis in the 1970s,
wants passage of the bill sponsored by United States Senators Dodd
and Hagel for the creation of a national infrastructure bank to
assist state and local governments increase "investment"
in infrastructure. But this is just more of what we use to call
public works (known as public jobs and waste of taxpayer money)
now repackaged as "investment," a term coined during the
Clinton administration. This national infrastructure bank would
have a capital base of $60 billion. It would provide subsidies for
certain projects, issue its own long-term bonds and insure the bonds
of local and state governments resulting in an estimated $250 billion
of funding and employment of a million or more (jobs is always a
key political word used by promoters of such projects). In addition
Rohatyn
wants an additional $250 billion of revenue
sharing by the federal government for state and local governments’
infrastructure projects particularly local schools (education is
another key political word used in promoting government projects).
Does anyone really think this will stop at $500 billion once the
floodgates are opened?
It should be
obvious where all this is heading – right into the pocketbook of
Rohatyn’s client Lehman Brothers who will sell the bonds which are
backed by the full faith and credit of the American taxpayers. These
are not investments which provide any increase in wealth from the
invested capital but rather transfer payments from taxpayers to
the beneficiaries of these public make-work projects resulting in
more waste of capital and taxpayers’ money. The beneficiaries will
be the investment bankers such as Lehman Brothers who will have
another financial product to sell (the long-term government bonds
backed by the taxpayer), the holders of the bonds (who receive interest
on the bonds which is paid by the American taxpayer) the contractors
and businesses (and their workers) who are awarded the bids for
construction of the infrastructure projects and the politicians
and bureaucrats who will be working hard to funnel this new money
into the pet projects of their constituents and clients. The losers
will be the American taxpayers who will have more of their money
taken by force to be transferred to the beneficiaries of these projects
through taxation and inflation and who will now have less money
for real investment and consumption.
Soros,
who is also noted for his advocacy of eclectic charitable and political
causes, the promotion of reflexivity and the open society, wants
the government to regulate credit as well as the money supply. "It's
time to recognize that markets do need to be regulated, and that
regulators have failed to fulfill their obligations over the past
25 years," Soros
told National Public Radio in the United States during an earlier
interview.
"I
think it ought to be part of (regulators) duties to prevent asset
bubbles from growing too big. For that, they would have to acknowledge
that markets tend to produce bubbles." For example Soros would have
regulators determine whether or not too much money is being directed
toward funding mortgages (the current asset bubble).
"We’ve
had a series of small financial crises since 1980. Each time, when
the real economy was threatened, the Fed stepped in, lowered interest
rates, provided monetary fiscal stimulus, so we got out of it."
According to Soros this action has reinforced both the credit expansion
and the misconception that markets are self-correcting. "For more
than the past 25 years, we've been in a period of credit expansion
and wealth creation. Now, we're in a period of credit contraction
and wealth destruction," said Soros in the NPR interview.
In
other words Soros wants the government, presumably the Federal Reserve,
to step in and determine the type of financing for which its fiat
currency is being loaned or invested. What a political free-for-all
this would be as various financial institutions, including presumably
Soros’ own Soros Fund Management, lobby for credit to be allocated
toward various sectors of the economy in the United States and internationally.
It is precisely this type of central planning and central bank legacy
of crisis and conflicts that has led us to the current financial
crisis. It is obvious what Soros’s problem is – he does not like
the current contraction in credit and the meltdown of asset values
(the correction of the Fed’s inflationary policies) from what he
sees as being malinvestments in the real estate sector caused by
the Fed’s inflationary policies. While Soros’ concerns are understandable
his solution shows a lack of understanding of the cause of the problem.
It
is the Fed that created the crisis through its inflationary policies
and has prolonged the crisis through its inflationary policies.
It is the market which has corrected the problem when consumers
re-adjusted their consumption-savings preferences borrowers could
not and would not pay the increase cost of the sub-prime loans,
the increase price of energy, the increased price of food and the
increase prices of other goods and services. The real economy re-appeared
and the false economy created by the Fed’s inflation was exposed
and hence began the inevitable and necessary correction.
The
solution is not more regulation of the credit market but deregulation
of the credit and financial markets (as well as other markets),
elimination and liquidation of the Fed and return to free banking
and sound currency that will help to stop spending on wasteful public
works and reduce the appearance of speculative bubbles as capital
is allocated to investments required by the market not malinvestments
promoted by the politicians, the bureaucrats and their special interest
clientele.
August
7, 2008
Jacob
Steelman [send
him mail] is President of International Ventures
Group, a global investment, finance and development company located
in Sydney, Australia.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
|