It's
Time To Buy a Truck
by Heidi C. Lange
by
Heidi C. Lange
DIGG THIS
Now that gas
is more expensive than it used to be, I've decided to upgrade to
a Sport Utility Vehicle. I made the decision about a month ago,
and almost everyone I know thinks I'm crazy. I'm not crazy, but
I do think I'm noticing something a lot of people are ignoring.
I've noticed that because the price of gas went up, SUVs are cheaper.
As anyone who's
watched TV or driven by a car dealer in the past few months knows,
hybrids and other fuel-efficient vehicles are quite popular these
days. An oft-unnoticed result of the rising demand for fuel-efficient
vehicles is the plummeting demand for their substitute, gas-guzzling
vehicles. Naturally, the price of gas guzzlers has dropped. Eventually,
it dropped enough to make gas guzzling cheaper than fuel efficiency.
I'll actually
save more money by buying a (now relatively cheap) SUV than I would
by purchasing a more fuel-efficient car. The savings on the purchase
price of an SUV will more than offset the extra money I'll be spending
on gas to drive it.
However, this
has not been one of my more popular decisions.
When I mentioned
my purchasing plans to my acquaintances and coworkers, they were
aghast at what they considered to be my disregard for the environment.
I don't think I've ever felt such strong peer pressure before. (Lucky
for me I have such little regard for my peers' opinions.) Almost
everyone I know has tried to convince me not to trade in my car
for a truck. When I explained my strong desire for cargo room (come
on, folks, I really can't take the dog camping in the back of a
sedan!), they suggested that I buy a hybrid SUV and reduce my "carbon
footprint." (Environmental Bigfoot, that's me all the way.) Then
somebody who knew me better made a different argument – she suggested
I'd save money if I bought a more fuel-efficient vehicle. (Ah-ha.
Now there's a way to convince people to help the environment. Give
them a financial incentive.)
So I sat down
and did some math. I'm not especially good at math, so it took me
longer than it probably would have taken you, and my results might
not be perfect, but here's what I figured out:
A more fuel-efficient
vehicle would cost me more, in both the short and the long run.
I started by
playing "Let's Pretend:" Let's pretend the price of gas will stay
at an even $3 over the coming years (a ridiculous assumption, I
know, but we have to assume something or I can't do the math). Let's
also pretend that my dream car is a certain 4WD, 8-seater, has-space-for-the-dog-in-the-back,
gasoline engine SUV that averages 19 mpg. I'm going to call it the
Tortoise. My eco-friendly alternative is a hybrid SUV which gets
32 mpg. I'll call the hybrid a Hare. Finally, I'm going to say that
the Tortoise and the Hare are comparable vehicles other than their
fuel consumption – each has a similar amount of cargo room, in-dash
GPS, leather, and the same amount of miles (I'm shopping in the
used market, of course). The only legitimate difference between
these two vehicles is that the Hare is relatively fuel-efficient,
and the Tortoise burns gas like a panda eats bamboo.
Now for the
Not-Pretend part: I drive at least 250 miles each week. (That should
make me a good candidate for a hybrid, right?) This means that if
I buy the Tortoise, I will spend about $1970 on gas in the first
year. (Ouch.) If I buy the Hare, I will spend about $1170 (Smaller
Ouch). In other words, in the first year, I would save $800 in gas
by purchasing the hybrid Hare (or if the price of gas goes up, I'll
save more).
That sounds
nice, I admit. But I remember Bastiat's advice fairly clearly, and
now it's time to go looking for That Which Is Unseen. In this case,
the key piece of the puzzle is that hybrids are more expensive than
their less trendy counterparts. Substantially more expensive.
The Hare costs
me about $29,000. The Tortoise costs me about $16,000. That is a
thirteen thousand dollar difference. If I'm saving $800 a year in
gas money, it would take 16.25 years to make up the difference.
That Which
Is Unseen, Item #2: I want a third row of seats. Can't get that
in a hybrid. How much is that worth to me? When I did my initial
shopping for this purchase I decided it was worth $1000 to me to
have a third row, since $1000 is the extra amount I'm willing to
pay, given two vehicles that are otherwise identical. (Sometimes
I have to pretend I'm really going to buy something before I can
tell what my true preferences are – when I pretended to myself that
I was going to buy a car without a third row, my pretend self was
unhappy enough to spend about a thousand pretend dollars to make
it better, but not unhappy enough to spend two thousand pretend
dollars. So I figure I can price this preference at a minimum of
one thousand dollars. Not a very scientific method, but it works
for me.)
Unseen #3:
Hybrids have expensive batteries to replace down the line (before
that sixteen-year payoff mark).
Unseen #4:
The extra money that I spend on the Hare ($13,000) is no longer
available to me as a source of interest income. That lengthens the
payoff period in a very real sense.
Unseen #5:
I don't feel as safe in a hybrid. I drive one at work, as it happens,
and I constantly have this feeling like I'll be squished between
two semi trucks before the poor little engine can get me out of
the way. Putting a price on this preference is tough… but I'm willing
to pay at least $500 to drive a Tortoise instead of a Hare.
The bottom
line is that it would be at least sixteen years before the money
I save in gas offsets the extra cost of the truck. Do I really want
to spend ten years trying to make up for a purchase that I'm not
in love with in the first place? No.
We're back
to square one: I like the Tortoise better, and it's cheaper. Therefore,
I will purchase it.
Ironically
enough, I think I can thank the trendy hybrid drivers for making
my Tortoise so relatively cheap. A year ago I couldn't get a Tortoise
for less than $23,000. It wasn't until trucks were shunned that
they became so affordable.
Gas-Guzzlers
R Us, here I come.
November
14, 2008
Heidi
C. Lange [send her mail]
lives in Southwest Florida, where she runs an online bookstore named
after her cat. She reads Ludwig von Mises in equal parts with science
fiction literature, and is proud to have studied economics under
Robert P. Murphy at Hillsdale College.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
|