Bill Buckley Made Me a Libertarian. Really.
by Dan Spielberg
by Dan Spielberg
DIGG THIS
As a High School
student in the late 1980's I watched a debate on television about
the legalization of drugs between William
F. Buckley, Jr. (the recently deceased founder of National
Review magazine, which was instrumental in turning
the American Right Wing from a pro-peace-and-freedom position
into the anti-freedom movement we know and love today) and everyone's
favorite "poverty-pimp," Jesse Jackson, with Buckley for once
taking the libertarian position and calling for an end to the caging
and torturing of drug sellers and users. I had never heard of Buckley
before, and I thought to myself, "well, this is an interesting fellow."
As one who favored the legalization of drugs, even back then, I
couldn't help but be charmed by Mr. Buckley’s aristocratic manner
combined with his willingness to take such a controversial, and
some would say "radical," position.
Once I arrived
at college, I began spending several hours a week perusing the political
books and magazines in the school library. I eventually came upon
several collections of Buckley's old columns, and one column struck
me in particular. It was an analysis of one of LBJ's "State of the
Union" speeches in which the President was bragging about all the
wonderful things that the "country was doing for it's people."
Buckley pointed out that what Johnson really meant was "what the
GOVERNMENT was doing for it’s people" and he went on to point out
that, despite all the kindergarten chatter about democracy we have
to put up with in this country, the government and the people are
distinct, separate entities and that the government is in many ways
a parasite on the body of the people. By way of illustration he
pointed to a federal "housing" program that had destroyed
thousands of more homes than the private sector had built in the
period of time that it had existed.
That column
was the first explicit defense of the free market I had ever read.
Soon after that I was exposed to essays by Milton
Friedman and Ayn
Rand and soon became a devoted intellectual foe of socialism
and government planning. Once I had adopted this perspective I came
to believe that the great menace to liberty came from the Left,
and particularly the extreme Left. Coming to that conclusion, and
being surrounded by silly Lefties on campus (like the white hippy
girl in my Spanish class who had just come back from Nicaragua and
wanted me to put on a Sandinista neckerchief for a class presentation)
drove me right into the hands of the Conservative Movement. I registered
Republican, donated money to the RNC, subscribed to National
Review and listened to Limbaugh every day (I was even a charter
subscriber to the Weekly Standard! Yuck).
It was through
reading National Review, and also Buckley’s older work from
the ’50’s and ’60’s, that I first heard of the great free market
economists Friedrich
Hayek and Ludwig von Mises
who both had proved in their works that socialism is not only wicked,
but counterproductive to boot. It was reading the works of Hayek
and Mises that first planted the libertarian/anarcho-capitalist
seed in my brain. (For if it is wicked and counterproductive for
the state to tell people how to run their economic affairs, is it
not even more so to require people to pay
taxes at the point of a gun? Or to require them give up their
freedom and their very lives to become a pawn in the racket
known as war?)
One day in
a used bookstore I ran across a copy of a collection of essays by
Frank
Meyer, a founding editor National Review, called "The
Conservative Mainstream." Of all the people who wrote for NR
in its early days, Meyer (a former high-ranking member of the American
Communist party) was the most libertarian. He stressed the importance
of individual rights while most of the NR writers were stressing
the need for the "community," through the apparatus of
the state, to enforce it’s will on individuals. He criticized Lincoln
for launching the Civil War and suppressing freedom throughout the
country while the execrable pro-Lincoln "historian" Harry
Jaffa babbled on about how the Union created the States (as
if that were even metaphysically possible). I soon began thinking
of myself a "Frank Meyer Conservative" to distinguish
myself from the nationalistic, government-worshipping types that
control
the Right Wing today.
Then, in March
of 2003, an issue of National Review arrived at my door with
a cover story by David Frum called "Unpatriotic
Conservatives" which was about all the supposedly evil,
anti-Semitic types on the Right who opposed the Iraq war because
they hated America and Israel. I knew most of the names mentioned
in this article, like Pat Buchanan, Sam Francis, Robert Novak and
Thomas Fleming (of Chronicles Magazine and the Rockford Institute).
One I did not know was Lew Rockwell. He seemed to be the staunchest
opponent of the war, judging by some of the quotes in the article.
The next day I checked out LewRockwell.com and read several of Lew’s
articles. It became a daily destination after that, and since
then I’ve read writers who I would never have been exposed to otherwise.
These writers have greatly deepened my understanding of American
history and American politics and have strengthened me in my conviction
that the state is an inherently anti-social,
evil institution. These writers include writers of the past
era (such as Harry
Elmer Barnes, Murray
Rothbard, James
J. Martin, Garet
Garrett, Albert
Jay Nock) and writers of the present era (such as Antiwar.com’s
Justin Raimondo,
and LewRockwell.com’s Thomas
E. Woods, Thomas
J. DiLorenzo, as well as too many others to name). I soon came
to realize that the Conservative Movement is a fraud, and that they
are as pro-state as the Left. They
just like different parts of the state (the Pentagon, the CIA, the
cops).
Although I
have come to see Buckley as a true villain of American history,
I at least have to be grateful that I came upon his work at a time
when my political beliefs were forming and could easily have taken
the socialist road, because otherwise I may have never have been
exposed to libertarian thought at all, and would have been a ripe
victim for pro-state propagandists, as most Americans are.
March
10, 2008
Dan
Spielberg [send him mail]
works in the real estate industry in Northern California.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
|