Röpke on the Subprime Mess
by Bart Fuller
by
Bart Fuller
DIGG THIS
In my personal
reading time, which is just a very few minutes a day, I’m reading
Wilhelm Röpke’s A
Humane Economy, having only become aware of his writings
in the last few months. As I read, I’m having one of those Yogi
Berra moments in that it feels like "déjà vu
all over again." I’ll explain why in just a bit, but first
let me set the stage.
Eleven years
ago this just passed Easter, I was received into the Catholic Church.
Several years prior to that, when I began, what I now know was my
journey into the Church, I was introduced to the early century writings
of the first Church leaders who are known as the Early Church Fathers.
I was stunned to learn in great detail about the sacraments and
liturgy of the Church from men who had been taught by the apostles.
I can still feel the sting of betrayal I felt at the realization
that this historical record of the Church had been ignored in my
own tradition. While I was delighted with my discovery, I was also
incensed that no leaders of my denomination had ever passed along
the complete Church history. I was left wondering, other than because
the facts did not fit with my tradition’s precepts, why had this
history been abandoned and ignored at the expense of the spiritual
health of the flock?
This is where
the "déjà vu" comes in. I have once again
felt the sting of betrayal as I work my way through Röpke.
Here’s a man who played a pivotal role in raising Germany from the
ashes of World War II and yet the typical economics student has
no idea of who he is. Over fifty years ago he was warning the post-war
Western world of the dangers of a mass culture, mass society and
mass man; where the soul of man is neglected in pursuit of material
gain; where the dignity of man is sacrificed on the altar of efficiency;
and where the media is employed for the dissemination of economic
and political propaganda aimed at directing and controlling the
masses. Yet the masses have not heard nor heeded his warning.
In A Humane
Economy, Röpke makes the case that the free market is not
only critical but, in fact, essential to liberty, both spiritual
and political. It is not, however, a sufficient foundation upon
which to build an economy unless it is also built on a moral framework;
a framework that honors the dignity of man and allows man to pursue
not only material gain but also his higher calling. A framework
too where the government is only minimally involved in the market
for such things as enforcing contracts. Without this framework the
market inevitably collapses into a collectivism that is manifested
in the welfare state.
The following
passage, from a section titled "The Spiritual and Moral Setting,"
was in my reading recently. It’s from a discussion arguing that
the free market pricing system, more than any other economic system,
works to focus and coordinate the interests of the individual towards
the interests of the community.
We know the
mechanism of this adjustment. The individual is forced by competition
to seek his own success in serving the market, that is, the consumer.
Obedience to the market ruled by free prices is rewarded by profit,
just as disobedience is punished by loss and eventual bankruptcy.
The profits and losses of economic activity, calculated as precisely
and correctly as possible by the methods of business economics,
are thus at the same time the indispensable guide to a rational
economy as a whole. Collectivist economies, of whatever degree
of collectivism, try in vain to replace this guidance by planning.
Coincidently,
just minutes before reading this, I had read Karen
De Coster’s blog entry on the Foreclosure Prevention Act of
2008. The analysis she provides exposes the homebuilders’ Iron Triangle
and gives a current example of how the government has interfered
in the free market pricing process that Röpke described and
violated the moral framework that he championed.
First, the
homebuilding, real estate and financial industries reaped huge profits
when the Federal Reserve Bank artificially lowered interest rates;
thus the firms and their customers did not have free market prices
for their products, but instead artificial prices that steered them
all to malinvestments. Once the rates were raised, the boom ended
and the market sought to wield the punishment of losses. But now
that the damage from the artificially low rates has been done, the
government seeks to interfere again. It seeks to minimize the damage
and losses it has wrought by its interference. If this bill passes,
the taxpayer will subsidize the losses of the homebuilders and other
businesses.
What this amounts
to is the vain collectivist central economic planning that Röpke
was writing about. The Federal Reserve with its monetary policy
of artificially low rates was trying to direct economic growth by
stimulating the housing market and all its associated industries.
Now that the plan has failed, Congress is trying to use fiscal policy
to relieve businesses of their losses. This relief will be paid
for with monies collected from the taxpayer. On both counts the
moral framework that was Röpke’s passion has been violated.
In the first case, the Federal Reserve gave businesses and consumers
what wasn’t rightfully theirs – low prices in the form of low interest
rates – at the expense of the saver, the consumer and those living
on fixed incomes. In the second case, Congress now seeks to give
again the same businesses and consumers what isn’t rightfully theirs
– essentially a rebate on their losses at the expense of the taxpayer.
By interfering
in the market in these fraudulent ways, the government, in the form
of the Federal Reserve and the Congress, is contributing to the
erosion of the moral framework that Röpke says is essential
to our economic, spiritual and political liberty. Röpke relates
a conversation with a contemporary in which he argued that "…the
economy was the front line of the defense of liberty and of all
its consequences for the moral and humane pattern of our civilization."
He continues with a call to economists to take up the "…task,
both arduous and honorable, of fighting for freedom, personality,
the rule of law, and the ethics of liberty at the most vulnerable
part of the front." It seems to me the battle lines are collapsing
and it’s time for all patriots, whether they are economists or not,
to join the fray.
April
9, 2008
Bart
Fuller
[send him mail] is a business
systems application developer from Michigan.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
|