and health authorities are facing angry questions about why H1N1
flu has not caused death and destruction on the scale first feared,
and they need to respond deftly to ensure public support.
are flying in British and French media that the pandemic has been
"hyped" by medical researchers to further their own cause,
boost research grants and line the pockets of drug companies.
newspaper this week asked "Pandemic? What Pandemic?"
Parisien newspaper ran the headline: "Swine flu: why the
French distrust the vaccine" and noted a gap between the predicted
impact of H1N1 and the less dramatic reality.
some 30-odd people have died...the disease is not really frightening,"
it said. "Dangerous liaisons between certain experts, the labs
and the government, the obscurity of the contracts between the state
and the pharma firms have added to the doubt."
scientists are walking a fine line. They say that although the virus
is mild, it can still kill, and that the relatively low fatalities
in Europe are in part, the result of official response to their
Britain, health authorities' original worst-case scenario
which said as many as 65,000 could die from H1N1 has twice
been revised down and the prediction is now for around 1,000 deaths,
way below the average annual toll of 4,000 to 8,000 deaths from
seasonal winter flu.
There is plenty
to be optimistic about as it seems the tide may be slowly turning
on this swine flu debacle, showing it for the hoax it really is.
are now demanding answers to the growing inconsistencies.
many so-called scientific experts have criticized me and others
who have spoken out about this senseless mass-vaccination campaign,
more of the scientific community is now coming to the same conclusions
weve been talking about for months.
It looks as
though the swine flu pandemic of 2009 will go down as one of the
biggest government and pharmaceutical scams ever, renewing a healthy,
and necessary, skepticism about the swine flu vaccine and the dubious
dealings behind the implementation of worldwide mass-vaccination
On the upside,
it has also created a more open debate about vaccinations in general.
vaccination schedule is in dire need of an overhaul, and the swine
flu hysteria has actually opened many peoples eyes to the
unhealthy practices behind our vaccine policies. The public is finally
starting to wonder and question, en masse, whats being injected
into them and their children.
Doctor and Health Minister Blast Swine Flu Vaccine and Manufacturers
signs are starting to crop up everywhere.
the Polish Health Minister Eva Kopacz recently told Parliament that
she, as a qualified family doctor with more than 20 years of experience,
will not authorize the use of vaccines with inadequate safety testing
on millions of people in Poland.
In her speech
have just one fundamental question: do we want to fight the flu
we have knowledge about enclosures in agreements that other governments
of wealthier countries have signed with vaccines producers. We
also know what was proposed to Poland.
Due to negotiations
in progress I cant tell all today. But I can tell one thing:
our Law Department found at least 20 points of doubt in the agreement.
is a Health Ministers duty? To sign agreements that are
in the best interest of the Polish people, or to sign agreements
that are of best interest of pharmaceutical companies?
I know that
there are three vaccines available on the market today, from three
different producers. Each has a different amount of active substance,
and yet strangely they are all treated the same. Therefore, isnt
it fair enough for the Health Minister and the experts to have
the slightest doubts about it?
if [the vaccine] is so miraculous, then why dont the manufacturers
want to introduce their medicine to the free market and take responsibility
they say: Wonderful, this is a safe medicine, therefore
I will take responsibility for it. I will introduce it to the
market and everything is clear and transparent, instead
of dropping the weight on us the buyers.
We do not
have clinical test results, no detailed ingredients and no information
about the side effects. The vaccines are now in the 4th stage
of tests very short tests, and we still do not have this
information. In addition, the samples have been very small. One
kind of vaccine was tested only on 160 volunteers aged 2060,
kind of vaccine was tested on 600 volunteers, aged 1860,
all healthy. Is this good enough, especially for us doctors present
in this room?
It is not
good enough for me.
anybody, anywhere, announced a pandemic because of seasonal flu?
And the seasonal flu is much more dangerous than swine flu. There
are deaths and severe complications. Was there ever a pandemic
push me to buy vaccines, I ask you: Why didnt you scream
and shout last year, 2 years ago, and in 2003? In 2003 there were
1,200,000 Poles with seasonal flu! Has anybody shouted, here in
this room: Lets buy vaccines for everybody!?
I cant recall such a thing.
an excerpt from her interview, questioning the sanity of placing
our unequivocal trust in a pharmaceutical company like Baxter:
Anyone can verify that the information Im going to disclose
is accurate and objective.
the end of January 2009, before this new flu was discovered, Baxter
Pharmaceuticals, a US company with a very important subsidiary
company in Austria, distributed vaccination material for the [seasonal]
flu, from the Austrian subsidiary via neighboring European countries
the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany to 16 different
material for the vaccine to be administered between February and
March to the population of those countries for the seasonal flu.
weighed 72 kg. Well, I havent calculated the exact number
of doses but it certainly means thousands and thousands of doses.
So this was distributed, and (there) comes a point, when through
one of those life coincidences, situations or plans are revealed
that otherwise would have remained in the dark.
company Bio Test was one of the recipients of this material. One
of their lab technicians decided through his own initiative
and as something he was qualified to do but not obliged
to carry out an extra security test with the vaccination material
that they received, before proceeding with its distribution.
inoculated this vaccine into animals called in Spanish "comadrejas"
or "hurones" weasels or ferrets, small mammals
that have been used since 1918 to test flu vaccines. He inoculated
these weasels, and all of them died.
observed these unexpected deaths, and given that the inoculated
vaccine shouldnt have caused the death of the weasels, he
immediately sounded the alarm and they began checks to establish
what this material received from Baxter contained.
results of the analysis showed that in the material delivered
by Baxter to those 106 laboratories, two live viruses coexisted.
the bird flu virus the bird flu virus is the virus that
appeared in 2005, and that caused a high mortality rate but infected
just a few people. The number of deaths worldwide, and I quote
by heart, was around 250 but as far as we know, around 60% of
those infected died. This means that if 250 died worldwide just
around 600 got infected, whichever the exact number is, the mortality
rate of this virus is very high, but its infection rate is minimal.
was mixed with a seasonal flu virus that, as we all know, has
an extremely low mortality rate; lower than, 0.01%, lower than
1% of mortality at any rate, but with a high degree of transmission.
Well, its highly contagious, with a high infection rate.
If you mix
these two viruses and then distribute it to thousands of people,
what youre doing is youre maximizing the probabilities
for these two viruses to merge; for them to recombine, and for
a new virus to appear to be both very lethal and very infectious.
a fact and this has been admitted by Baxter. They havent
said No, this is not true. This is just what by Jane Burgermeister
says, or whoever, but this material wasnt there.
have admitted that the contamination took place but not that the
material was designed for human use. Claiming protection behind
the confidentiality rights, they havent disclosed information
about its destination, and that the total 72 kg of the material
contained a mix of live bird flu and seasonal flu viruses.
a fact. Could this have happened by chance?
thing that must be said is that it is extremely unlikely.
And I say
this simply because in science the word impossible
is something we never say. What does extremely unlikely mean?
It means that laboratories handling this kind of viruses have
Bio Security Levels in place. The Bio Security Level 3 is the
highest, and the one that must be applied to this laboratory.
that if we talk in a scientific context about probability, based
on known facts, the probability that this may have happened by
chance is extremely low. Not only this, how can we explain the
mixing of two different live viruses?
the flu vaccines, as we all know, are vaccines made with attenuated
viruses. This means that its perfectly normal for the flu
vaccine to contain live virus; this is not an exception. But attenuated
means that the virus must go through a radiation procedure. These
viruses found in the Czech Republic in the whole Baxter material
had not been attenuated. Therefore the odds of it happening by
why I say that, scientifically, or simply from a humanly prudent
standpoint, we cant say that its 100% impossible but,
lets be clear its important to let it be known
how unlikely it is for an accident to occur under these circumstances.
know that there are people who have been studying this for a while
but I would wish that my message reaches someone who says, Look
I dont know anything about that stuff, but Ive just
heard that there was a laboratory that delivered a contaminated
vaccine and that, interestingly, is one of the laboratories in
charge of making flu vaccines this year.
fact alone makes it justifiable to myself to think that, until
such time that an explanation is given about why this contamination
took place, I wont wish it on me, on my child, nor on anyone
close to me.
of this magnitude a mistake that had the capacity
to kill thousands of people and spread highly infectious, deadly
disease worldwide, indeed START a pandemic of the epic proportions
theyve tried to turn the swine flu into was REWARDED
with massive contracts for more flu vaccines!
doesnt seem like an accident.
And this is
one of the companies they want you to blindly trust
increasing skepticism about this pandemic, and increasing demands
for answers to important questions, government health officials
are still playing coy.
to which they go to keep this misinformation campaign this
deception going, is staggering.
News quotes Dr. Anne Schuchat, director of the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Immunization
and Respiratory Diseases as saying:
estimation method we are using now, we believe, gives us probably
a more accurate picture of the full scope of the pandemic. What
we are seeing in 2009 is unprecedented. As people know, we haven't
had a [flu] pandemic since 1957. To have high rates of influenza
in September and October is extremely unusual.
already seen a larger number of pediatric deaths than we have
seen for several years. I do believe that the pediatric death
toll from this pandemic will be extensive, and much greater than
what we see with seasonal flu."
but since when can counting oranges in an apple orchard give you
a more accurate picture of your apple harvest?
be silly. And so is counting flu-like illnesses that
have nothing to do with the H1N1 virus. As reported
by the New American, this guessing based on flawed
data has quadrupled the number of estimated deaths.
The CDC stopped
type-testing flu cases in August, and instead, theyre counting
each and every person who presents flu-like symptoms!
This is most definitely NOT going to produce more accurate numbers.
the CDC claims that some 99 percent of all influenza this season
is H1N1, hence they dont need to do lab testing anymore to
get accurate numbers. Ninety-nine percent is a far cry from what
CBS News found when they investigated actual flu samples from across
The H1N1 virus
only turned up in 117 percent of samples from patients
with flu-like illness.
exaggerated numbers are then used to frighten you into compliance
with their mass-vaccination plan. Because, naturally, Dr. Schuchat
stated that vaccination is the best protection against the H1N1
swine flu, and that as of November 12, there were 41.6 million doses
of the vaccine available.
directive is, of course, to run out and get one while you
The CDC previously estimated that the US death toll from the swine
flu would be around 90,000. Even using their own bloated numbers
some 80 percent of which are in all likelihood unrelated
to H1N1 3,900 people have actually died.
STILL, according to their own statistics stating that the flu kills
36,000 Americans a year, put us squarely in the middle of the mildest
flu season in recent memory.
cant have it both ways.
the mildest flu season in years, then theres no reason to
panic. And if its one of the worst, then where are the statistics
proving this to be so?
for example, has not been able to prove mass casualties, and changed
their mortality estimates from 65,000 all the way down to 1,000.
And guess what, their stated average annual death toll from the
seasonal flu is between 4,000 and 8,000!
is a great example of how high-ranking health officials do not truly
understand viruses, or how your immune system is capable of fending
off these supposedly deadly diseases so easily.
for skepticism is the fact that the same people who are inventing
ways to inflate the disease count by changing definitions
and disease criteria, for example are playing the same games
By their own
estimates, 90,000 people were predicted to die, so the vaccine would
be of benefit. Well, they were wrong on both counts.
a healthy immune system, and extreme respect for how your body develops
real immunity, must be placed above the misguided advice from Big
Pharma and the health agencies they unduly (and sometimes unlawfully)