Illiterate in L.A.
by
Vox Day
by Vox Day
The
Los Angeles Daily News recently lamented the tremendous increase
in "functional illiteracy" among the working population of Los Angeles
County. In reporting the results of a recent study, it said:
In
the Los Angeles region, 53 percent of workers ages 16 and older
were deemed functionally illiterate, the study said ... It classified
3.8 million Los Angeles County residents as "low-literate," meaning
they could not write a note explaining a billing error, use a
bus schedule or locate an intersection on a street map.
While
the article took note of the wasted "hundreds of millions of dollars
spent in public schools over the past decade," it blamed the terrible
results on an influx of non-English speaking immigrants and a 30
percent high-school dropout rate.
But
the dropout rate can't possibly explain the low level of literacy,
because if the public school system was even remotely competent,
the children would be reading adequately long before they ever reached
high school.
Long-time
readers may recall a column titled, "A
Tale of 2 Children," wherein I compared two 3-year old children,
one of whom was being taught to read by his parents and one who
was destined for public school. The two children are now 5 years
old, and I recently examined their progress.
The
child in kindergarten is not yet reading, but he has learned his
complete alphabet now. The homeschooled child, on the other hand,
surprised me by reading at an error-free fifth-grade level on the
San Diego Quick Assessment test. I verified his competence by asking
him to read selections from C.S. Lewis' "Prince Caspian" to me,
a book with which he was previously unfamiliar. While he occasionally
stumbled on words such as versification and centaur, (he pronounced
them "versication" and "kentaur"), his comprehension was reasonably
good as well.
Suddenly,
it was not so hard to understand how homeschooled children, on the
average, test four years ahead of their public-schooled counterparts.
The
problem with public schools and reading is not hard to grasp. Whole
language, the favored method, is a disastrous approach to reading
that is destined for failure. Children who learn to read while being
taught this method learn to read in spite of it, not because
of it. Anyone who speaks Japanese and has learned both kana (phonetic)
and kanji (whole language) can testify to the ease of the first
and the extreme difficulty of the latter.
It's
a pity that the Daily News does not have access to studies tracking
the reading ability of children who are schooled at home in Los
Angeles County. It would be interesting to see how well those children
read compared to these illiterate workers, particularly immigrant
children taught at home, because as hard as it may be for the Daily
News to imagine, people who speak other languages, even Spanish,
have been known to be able to read. I can't confirm this, but I
have even heard rumors that there are reputed to be one or two authors,
such as the suspiciously foreign-sounding Arturo Perez Reverte,
who actually write in Spanish, if you can believe anything
so outlandish.
The
truth is that it is extremely simple to teach any normal child to
read. All it requires is a consistent 15 minutes a day between the
ages of three and five. If a child is capable of rote memorization,
he is capable of learning the alphabet and the basic phonics, and
reading will follow within months. The fact that the public schools
so regularly fail at this simple task is not indicative of anything
but the absolute incompetence of the public-school system – an incompetence
that is not only designed into the system, but is its very raison
d'ętre.
One
need only look at an elementary school's curriculum to realize that
the bulk of a child's education necessarily comes from outside the
school environment. It may come from parents, peers or the television,
but very little of it comes from the free day-care centers that
are the public schools.
Fred
Reed has a simple answer for America's education problem. It is
an inventive, capitalist solution involving the intimate interaction
of cement and potassium cyanide with the teaching colleges, and
bounties on certified teachers. But, as he has said himself, America
isn't interested in solutions that will work – much better to wring
our hands, hope for the best and condemn yet another generation
to illiteracy, ignorance and idiocy.
September
15, 2004
Vox
Day [send him mail]
is syndicated nationally by Universal Press Syndicate. Visit his
web log, Vox Popoli, for
daily commentary and responses to reader email.
Copyright
© 2004 Universal Press Syndicate
|