Invitation to Counterfactual Speculation
by
Jonathan Carriel
by Jonathan Carriel
Let’s
imagine the Napoleonic Wars – and the "War of 1812" –
had somehow dragged on for another three years, until 1818. During
those years, while finally subjugating Bonaparte (the pyrrhic victor
of Waterloo), Great Britain (victor in New Orleans) had also managed
to reoccupy the half-dozen largest coastal cities of the United
States, and had summarily proclaimed the 40-year-old American republic
defunct. The misguided experiment was officially repudiated, the
leading politicians of the day and the surviving signers of the
Declaration of Independence were hanged, and North America – Oregon
to Georgia to Labrador – was back in the hands of mad King George
III.
Except
that 85% of the population didn’t like the idea one bit, and passionately
wanted the redcoats to vacate. No matter how vehemently the British
protested that they’d saved the ungrateful Yankees from both the
tyranny of Napoleon and that of mob rule, and that some form of
local self-government would soon be forthcoming, a preponderance
of the Americans bitterly objected to the mere sight of scarlet
uniforms on the streets. These "republican-remnants" took
to forming militias in the countryside, and it soon became suicidal
for British troops to travel overland. Worse, despite the formal
declaration of peace, sniping backwoodsmen routinely picked off
individual soldiers right in the "Red Zone!"
Given
these circumstances, examples had had to be made, and both Newport,
R.I., and Annapolis, Md., had been burned to the ground; it was
widely feared that Charleston, S.C., would be next. Yet so far from
learning the obvious lesson, the "colonists" – as the
insurgents were once again called – only seemed to be gaining in
strength.
The
civil struggle among the American-born (severe enough during the
Revolution) now became horrifyingly intense. Where "Tories"
had once been tarred and feathered, their descendants were subject
to savage capital punishments, leading the urbane Europeans to declare
that white Americans had descended to the putative "sub-human"
level of the continent’s aborigines. News of atrocities regularly
made it back to Britain; enumerations of the appallingly high general
levels of military and civilian carnage, however, did not.
British
taxpayers, desperate for relief after a ruinous quarter-century
of global struggle, did wonder why on earth their government was
attempting to retake the colonies when, during the decade of general
peace (from 17811793), trade had hummed along nicely, and
none of them had been the poorer for it. A blue-ribbon commission
of independent experts (created behind the King’s back), presently
reported its finding that, notwithstanding the British military’s
unquestioned status as the world’s preeminent superpower, Britain
could simply never commit enough resources – money and manpower
– to the faraway continent to overcome the determined, lasting opposition
that had been discerned there. (Emphasis was added to clarify that
"never" meant, well, never.)
In
his few lucid moments, however, King George still insisted that
the colonies be returned, so that he could pass their hugely valuable
markets and natural resources on to his shockingly disreputable
progeny. (And "his people" too, of course!)
A
small segment of the British public supported this "neo-royalist"
position. A larger faction suggested reconvening to the Congress
of Vienna in the hope that other Europeans could be convinced to
share the cost of subjugating the recalcitrants. Still others were
simply loath to admit defeat, and hoped that negotiations could
improve matters to the point where just a few fortifications
could be left permanently on American soil. A disreputable minority
proposed packing up and leaving with all haste.
Quandary:
It is 1818. You are an upstanding, loyal, patriotic citizen of Great
Britain. What would you recommend your government do at this juncture?
December
14, 2004
Jonathan
Carriel [send him mail]
is a local area network engineer in New York City. He received a
B.A. and M.A. in history from New York University (1969, 1970).
Here
is his website.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
|