Following the
Fukushima nuclear disaster, the Japanese Government raised the level
of allowable radiation from 1 to 20 millisieverts per year. This
so-called safety level is the cut-off criterion for
compensation for damage to private property incurred by fallout
contamination. The reasoning is: if doses below 20 millisieverts
per year are safe, then property holders have no grounds upon which
to file suit for compensation and the perpetrators are thereby shielded
from liability.
However, while
officials proclaim that there is no evidence of harm below 20 millisieverts
per year, this detailed review of both historical and contemporary
radiation research demonstrates the contrary:
My video review
tests the official claim of safety against established radiobiology
codified in the United States National Academy of Sciences' consensus
report on low-dose radiation. The Academy's risk model predicts
that 20 millisieverts or below will not only cause cancers, but
will primarily kill women and children.
We'll also
test the official claim of safety against recently published research,
such as the largest study of nuclear workers ever conducted. Comprising
over 400,000 workers from 15 countries, the study found increased
cancer mortality among nuclear workers exposed to an average of
just 2 millisieverts per year. That's just one tenth of the
allegedly safe 20 millisieverts per year allowed in Fukushima.
And that's
just the tip of the iceberg of the evidence brought to bear against
the anti-property and anti-health policies of officialdom. To summarize
the findings in my video review:
U.S. National
Academy of Sciences predicts cancer < 20 millisieverts per
year.
Research
since the Academy's report corroborates that prediction.
Research
suggests the Academy may underestimate cancer risk.
Research
finds < 20 millisieverts linked to genetic damage.
Therefore,
Japans allowance of 20 millisieverts per year is not safe!
December
19, 2011
Ian Goddard
[send him mail] is a freelance
graphics artist and writer with a bachelor's degree in computer
studies. He is also research assistant to best-selling author Peter
Breggin, MD. Some of his analyses are published in peer-reviewed
professional journals on topics such as drug
and dietary
risks, as well as in the Mega Society's journal Noesis
and here on lewrockwell.com. His wide-ranging interests are featured
on his website.